The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Measuring and Explaining Change in Artifact Variation with Clade-Diversity Diagrams
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
EA has used methods including frequency and occurrence seriation, clade-diversity diagrams, and cladograms to determine empirically whether functional units influence reproductive success.
“And despite Bamforth's claims, EA has used a battery of methods, including frequency and occurrence seriation, clade-diversity diagrams, and cladograms, to determine this empirically (Lyman and O'Brien 2000;O'Brien and Lyman 2000b;O'Brien et al. 2001O'Brien et al. ,2002)).”
From What Is Evolution? A Response to Bamforth (2003) · cites this paper as Lyman and O'Brien 2000
Macroevolutionary concepts such as punctuated equilibrium and methods such as cladistics and clade-diversity diagrams are directly applicable to archaeology.
“We have detailed in numerous places that certain macroevolutionary concepts, such as punctuated equilibrium (O'Brien and Lyman 2000b), and macroevolutionary methods, such as cladistics and clade-diversity diagrams (Lyman and O'Brien 2000;O'Brien and Lyman 1999, 2000b, 2002a;O'Brien et al. 2001O'Brien et al. ,2002)), are directly applicable to archaeology.”
From What Is Evolution? A Response to Bamforth (2003) · cites this paper as Lyman and O'Brien 2000
Citations
Cites
Diversification and Extinction in the History of Life
Benton, M. J. (1995) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.7701342 · Cited by 654
Asymmetry of Lineages and the Direction of Evolutionary Time
Gould, S. J., Gilinsky, N. L., & German, R. Z. (1987) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.236.4807.1437 · Cited by 177
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 83
- Beals, 1945, Archaeological studies in northeast Arizona, University of California, Publications in American Archaeology and Ethnology, 44, 1
- Beck, 1995, Functional analysis and the differential persistence of Great Basin dart forms, Journal of California and Great Basin Anthropology, 17, 222
- Bettinger, 1991, Projectile points as time markers in the Great Basin, American Anthropologist, 93, 166, 10.1525/aa.1991.93.1.02a00140 · DOI
- Binford, 1965, Archaeological systematics and the study of culture process, American Antiquity, 31, 203, 10.2307/2693985 · DOI
- Bookstein, 1987, Random walk and the existence of evolutionary rates, Paleobiology, 13, 446, 10.1017/S0094837300009039 · DOI
- Braun, 1991, Why decorate a pot? Midwestern household pottery, 200 B.C.–A.D. 600, Journal of Anthropological Archaeology, 10, 360, 10.1016/0278-4165(91)90007-K · DOI
- Braun, 1982, Evolution of “tribal” social networks: Theory and prehistoric North American evidence, American Antiquity, 47, 504, 10.2307/280232 · DOI
- Burgh, 1959, Ceramic profiles in the western mound at Awatovi, northeastern Arizona, American Antiquity, 25, 184, 10.2307/277438 · DOI
- Carroll, 1986, Physical and biological constraints on the pattern of vertebrate evolution, Geoscience Canada, 13, 85
- Deetz, 1965, The Doppler effect and archaeology: A consideration of the spatial aspects of seriation, Southwestern Journal of Anthropology, 21, 196, 10.1086/soutjanth.21.3.3629228 · DOI
- Deetz, 1967, Death's head, cherub, urn and willow, Natural History, 76, 29
- Dethlefsen, 1966, Death's heads, cherubs, and willow trees: Experimental archaeology in colonial cemeteries, American Antiquity, 31, 502, 10.2307/2694382 · DOI
- Dunnell, 1970, Seriation method and its evaluation, American Antiquity, 35, 305, 10.2307/278341 · DOI
- Dunnell, 1978, Style and function: A fundamental dichotomy, American Antiquity, 43, 192, 10.2307/279244 · DOI
- Dunnell, 1980, Evolutionary theory and archaeology, Advances in Archaeological Method and Theory, 3, 35, 10.1016/B978-0-12-003103-0.50007-1 · DOI
- Dunnell, R. C.1989Diversity in archaeology: A group of measures in search of application? In Quantifying diversity in archaeology, R. D. Leonard and G. T. Jones, pp. 142–149. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
- Evans, 1850, On the date of British coins, The Numismatic Chronicle and Journal of the Numismatic Society, 12, 127
- Flenniken, 1989, Typology, technology, and chronology of Great Basin dart points, American Anthropologist, 91, 149, 10.1525/aa.1989.91.1.02a00100 · DOI
- Foote, 1991, Morphological and taxonomic diversity in a clade's history: The blastoid record and stochastic simulations, University of Michigan, Contributions from the Museum of Paleontology, 28, 101
- Ford, J. A. 1938, An examination of some theories and methods of ceramic analysis. Unpublished M.A. thesis, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor.
- Ford, 1949, Cultural dating of prehistoric sites in Virú Valley, Peru, American Museum of Natural History, Anthropological Papers, 43, 29
- Ford, 1952, Measurements of some prehistoric design developments in the southeastern states, American Museum of Natural History, Anthropological Papers, 44, 313
- Ford, 1962, A quantitative method for deriving cultural chronology, Pan American Union
- Gilinsky, 1986, The evolutionary bootstrap: A new approach to the study of taxonomic diversity, Paleobiology, 12, 251, 10.1017/S0094837300013762 · DOI
- Gilinsky, 1989, Asymmetries of clade shape and the direction of evolutionary time, Science, 243, 1613, 10.1126/science.243.4898.1613 · DOI
- Gould, 1978, Generality and uniqueness in the history of life: An exploration with random models, BioScience, 28, 277, 10.2307/1307280 · DOI
- Gould, 1988, Trends as changes in variance: A new slant on progress and directionality in evolution, Journal of Paleontology, 62, 319, 10.1017/S0022336000059126 · DOI · Paper page
- Gould, 1989, A developmental constraint in Cerion, with comments on the definition and interpretation of constraint in evolution, Evolution, 43, 516, 10.2307/2409056 · DOI
- Gould, 1977, The shape of evolution: A comparison of real and random clades, Paleobiology, 3, 23, 10.1017/S009483730000508X · DOI
- Hughes, 1998, Getting to the point: Evolutionary change in prehistoric weaponry, Journal of Archaeological Method and Theory, 5, 345, 10.1007/BF02428421 · DOI
- Hutchinson, 1981, Random adaptation and imitation in human evolution, American Scientist, 69, 161
- Jones, 1989, Comment on “Diversity, organization, and behavior in the material record” by M. J. Shott, Current Anthropology, 30, 305
- Kidder, 1917, A design-sequence from New Mexico, National Academy of Sciences, Proceedings, 3, 369, 10.1073/pnas.3.5.369 · DOI
- Kintigh, 1984, Measuring archaeological diversity by comparison with simulated assemblages, American Antiquity, 49, 44, 10.2307/280511 · DOI
- Kirchner, 1998, No fractals in fossil extinction statistics, Nature, 395, 337, 10.1038/26384 · DOI
- Kitchell, 1988, Macroevolutionary interpretations of symmetry and synchroneity in the fossil record, Science, 240, 1190, 10.1126/science.240.4856.1190 · DOI
- Kitchell, 1989, Response (to Gilinsky et al.), Science, 243, 1614, 10.1126/science.243.4898.1614 · DOI · Paper page
- Krieger, 1944, The typological concept, American Antiquity, 9, 271, 10.2307/275785 · DOI · Paper page
- Kroeber, 1940, Stimulus diffusion, American Anthropologist, 42, 1, 10.1525/aa.1940.42.1.02a00020 · DOI
- Leonard, 1987, Elements of an inclusive evolutionary model for archaeology, Journal of Anthropological Archaeology, 6, 199, 10.1016/0278-4165(87)90001-8 · DOI · Paper page
- Lipo, 1997, Population structure, cultural transmission, and frequency seriation, Journal of Anthropological Archaeology, 16, 301, 10.1006/jaar.1997.0314 · DOI
- Lyman, 1998, The goals of evolutionary archaeology: History and explanation, Current Anthropology, 39, 615, 10.1086/204786 · DOI
- Lyman, 1998, Seriation, superposition, and interdigitation: A history of Americanist graphic depictions of culture change, American Antiquity, 63, 239, 10.2307/2694696 · DOI
- McCartney, 1990, Simulation models and the interpretation of archaeological diversity, American Antiquity, 55, 521, 10.2307/281282 · DOI
- Meltzer, 1981, A study of style and function in a class of tools, Journal of Field Archeology, 8, 313, 10.1179/009346981791504914 · DOI
- Meltzer, 1992, The relationship between sample size and diversity in archaeological assemblages, Journal of Archaeological Science, 19, 375, 10.1016/0305-4403(92)90056-9 · DOI
- Miller, 1988, Modeling bivalve diversification: The effect of interaction on a macroevolutionary system, Paleobiology, 14, 364, 10.1017/S0094837300012100 · DOI
- Neff, 1992, Ceramics and evolution, Archaeological Method and Theory, 4, 141
- Neff, 1993, Theory, sampling, and analytical technique in the archaeological study of prehistoric ceramics, American Antiquity, 58, 23, 10.2307/281452 · DOI
- Neiman, 1995, Stylistic variation in evolutionary perspective: Inferences from decorative diversity and interassemblage distance in Illinois Woodland ceramic assemblages, American Antiquity, 60, 7, 10.2307/282074 · DOI
- O'Brien, 1990, Variation, selection, and the archaeological record, Archaeological Method and Theory, 2, 31
- O'Brien, 1992, The role of adaptation in archaeological explanation, American Antiquity, 57, 3, 10.2307/2694834 · DOI · Paper page
- O'Brien, 1998, Basic incompatibilities between evolutionary and behavioral archaeology, American Antiquity, 63, 485, 10.2307/2694632 · DOI
- O'Connell, 1994, Surprise Valley projectile points and their chronological implications, Journal of California and Great Basin Anthropology, 16, 162
- Patterson, 1988, Periodicity in extinction: The role of systematics, Ecology, 70, 802, 10.2307/1941349 · DOI
- Patterson, 1963, Contemporaneity and cross-dating in archaeological interpretation, American Antiquity, 28, 389, 10.2307/278283 · DOI
- Petrie, 1899, Sequences in prehistoric remains, Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute of Great Britain and Ireland, 29, 295, 10.2307/2843012 · DOI
- Phillips, 1951, Archaeological survey in the lower Mississippi Valley, 1940–1947, Peabody Museum of American Archaeology and Ethnology
- Phillips, 1953, Method and theory in American archaeology: An operational basis for culture-historical integration, American Anthropologist, 55, 615, 10.1525/aa.1953.55.5.02a00030 · DOI
- Prothero, 1985, North American mammalian diversity and Eocene-Oligocene extinctions, Paleobiology, 11, 389, 10.1017/S0094837300011696 · DOI
- Raup, 1977, Probabilistic models in evolutionary paleobiology, American Scientist, 65, 50
- Raup, 1974, Stochastic simulation and evolution of morphology—Towards a nomothetic paleontology, Systematic Zoology, 23, 305, 10.2307/2412538 · DOI
- Raup, 1973, Stochastic models of phylogeny and the evolution of diversity, Journal of Geology, 81, 525, 10.1086/627905 · DOI
- Rhode, 1988, Measurement of archaeological diversity and the sample-size effect, American Antiquity, 53, 708, 10.2307/281114 · DOI
- Rosenberg, 1994, Pattern, process, and hierarchy in the evolution of culture, Journal of Anthropological Archaeology, 13, 307, 10.1006/jaar.1994.1017 · DOI
- Rouse, 1939, Prehistory in Haiti: A study in method, Yale University Publications in Anthropology No. 21
- Rouse, 1955, On the correlation of phases of culture, American Anthropologist, 57, 713, 10.1525/aa.1955.57.4.02a00050 · DOI
- Rowe, 1961, Stratigraphy and seriation, American Antiquity, 26, 324, 10.2307/277399 · DOI
- Schiffer, 1996, Some relationships between behavioral and evolutionary archaeologies, American Antiquity, 61, 643, 10.2307/282009 · DOI
- Sepkoski, 1981, Phanerozoic marine diversity and the fossil record, Nature, 293, 435, 10.1038/293435a0 · DOI
- Shott, 1989, Diversity, organization, and behavior in the material record, Current Anthropology, 30, 283, 10.1086/203745 · DOI
- Signor, 1982, Species richness in the Phanerozoic: Compensating for sampling bias, Geology, 10, 625, 10.1130/0091-7613(1982)10<625:SRITPC>2.0.CO;2 · DOI
- Spencer, 1997, Evolutionary approaches in archaeology, Journal of Archaeological Research, 5, 209, 10.1007/BF02229153 · DOI
- Stanley, 1981, Natural clades differ from “random” clades: Simulations and analyses, Paleobiology, 7, 115, 10.1017/S0094837300003833 · DOI
- Stein, 1989, Where guesses come from: Evolutionary epistemology and the anomaly of guided variation, Biology and Philosophy, 4, 33, 10.1007/BF00144038 · DOI
- Steward, 1929, Diffusion and independent invention: A critique of logic, American Anthropologist, 31, 491, 10.1525/aa.1929.31.3.02a00070 · DOI
- Teltser, P. A.1995Culture history, evolutionary theory, and frequency seriation. In Evolutionary archaeology: Methodological issues, P. A. Teltser, pp. 51–68. University of Arizona Press, Tucson. · DOI
- Thomas, 1981, How to classify the projectile points from Monitor Valley, Nevada, Journal of California and Great Basin Anthropology, 3, 7
- Uhen, 1996, An evaluation of clade-shape statistics using simulations and extinct families of mammals, Paleobiology, 22, 8, 10.1017/S0094837300015980 · DOI
- Valentine, 1996, Hierarchies in biology and paleontology, Paleobiology, 22, 23, 10.1017/S0094837300015992 · DOI
- Vrba, 1989, Levels of selection and sorting with special reference to the species level, Oxford Surveys in Evolutionary Biology, 6, 111
- Vrba, 1986, The hierarchical expansion of sorting and selection: Sorting and selection cannot be equated, Paleobiology, 12, 217, 10.1017/S0094837300013671 · DOI · Paper page
- Willey, 1945, Horizon styles and pottery traditions in Peruvian archaeology, American Antiquity, 10, 49, 10.2307/275530 · DOI
Cited by
Sorted by citations
What Is Evolution? A Response to Bamforth
O'Brien, M. J., Lyman, R. L., & Leonard, R. D. (2003) · American Antiquity · doi:10.2307/3557109 · Cited by 14
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Lyman, R. L., & O'Brien, M. J.
- Venue
- Journal of Anthropological Archaeology
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2000-03
- Volume
- 19
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 39-74
- ISSN
- 0278-4165
- Cited by
- 44
- References
- 2
- Language
- en
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review