Cited by 44

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Measuring and Explaining Change in Artifact Variation with Clade-Diversity Diagrams

Lyman, R.Lee, O'Brien, Michael J.·2000·Journal of Anthropological Archaeology

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1006/jaar.1999.0339

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • EA has used methods including frequency and occurrence seriation, clade-diversity diagrams, and cladograms to determine empirically whether functional units influence reproductive success.

    “And despite Bamforth's claims, EA has used a battery of methods, including frequency and occurrence seriation, clade-diversity diagrams, and cladograms, to determine this empirically (Lyman and O'Brien 2000;O'Brien and Lyman 2000b;O'Brien et al. 2001O'Brien et al. ,2002)).”

    From What Is Evolution? A Response to Bamforth (2003) · cites this paper as Lyman and O'Brien 2000

  • Macroevolutionary concepts such as punctuated equilibrium and methods such as cladistics and clade-diversity diagrams are directly applicable to archaeology.

    “We have detailed in numerous places that certain macroevolutionary concepts, such as punctuated equilibrium (O'Brien and Lyman 2000b), and macroevolutionary methods, such as cladistics and clade-diversity diagrams (Lyman and O'Brien 2000;O'Brien and Lyman 1999, 2000b, 2002a;O'Brien et al. 2001O'Brien et al. ,2002)), are directly applicable to archaeology.”

    From What Is Evolution? A Response to Bamforth (2003) · cites this paper as Lyman and O'Brien 2000

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 83

  1. Beals, 1945, Archaeological studies in northeast Arizona, University of California, Publications in American Archaeology and Ethnology, 44, 1
  2. Beck, 1995, Functional analysis and the differential persistence of Great Basin dart forms, Journal of California and Great Basin Anthropology, 17, 222
  3. Bettinger, 1991, Projectile points as time markers in the Great Basin, American Anthropologist, 93, 166, 10.1525/aa.1991.93.1.02a00140 · DOI
  4. Binford, 1965, Archaeological systematics and the study of culture process, American Antiquity, 31, 203, 10.2307/2693985 · DOI
  5. Bookstein, 1987, Random walk and the existence of evolutionary rates, Paleobiology, 13, 446, 10.1017/S0094837300009039 · DOI
  6. Braun, 1991, Why decorate a pot? Midwestern household pottery, 200 B.C.–A.D. 600, Journal of Anthropological Archaeology, 10, 360, 10.1016/0278-4165(91)90007-K · DOI
  7. Braun, 1982, Evolution of “tribal” social networks: Theory and prehistoric North American evidence, American Antiquity, 47, 504, 10.2307/280232 · DOI
  8. Burgh, 1959, Ceramic profiles in the western mound at Awatovi, northeastern Arizona, American Antiquity, 25, 184, 10.2307/277438 · DOI
  9. Carroll, 1986, Physical and biological constraints on the pattern of vertebrate evolution, Geoscience Canada, 13, 85
  10. Deetz, 1965, The Doppler effect and archaeology: A consideration of the spatial aspects of seriation, Southwestern Journal of Anthropology, 21, 196, 10.1086/soutjanth.21.3.3629228 · DOI
  11. Deetz, 1967, Death's head, cherub, urn and willow, Natural History, 76, 29
  12. Dethlefsen, 1966, Death's heads, cherubs, and willow trees: Experimental archaeology in colonial cemeteries, American Antiquity, 31, 502, 10.2307/2694382 · DOI
  13. Dunnell, 1970, Seriation method and its evaluation, American Antiquity, 35, 305, 10.2307/278341 · DOI
  14. Dunnell, 1978, Style and function: A fundamental dichotomy, American Antiquity, 43, 192, 10.2307/279244 · DOI
  15. Dunnell, 1980, Evolutionary theory and archaeology, Advances in Archaeological Method and Theory, 3, 35, 10.1016/B978-0-12-003103-0.50007-1 · DOI
  16. Dunnell, R. C.1989Diversity in archaeology: A group of measures in search of application? In Quantifying diversity in archaeology, R. D. Leonard and G. T. Jones, pp. 142–149. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
  17. Evans, 1850, On the date of British coins, The Numismatic Chronicle and Journal of the Numismatic Society, 12, 127
  18. Flenniken, 1989, Typology, technology, and chronology of Great Basin dart points, American Anthropologist, 91, 149, 10.1525/aa.1989.91.1.02a00100 · DOI
  19. Foote, 1991, Morphological and taxonomic diversity in a clade's history: The blastoid record and stochastic simulations, University of Michigan, Contributions from the Museum of Paleontology, 28, 101
  20. Ford, J. A. 1938, An examination of some theories and methods of ceramic analysis. Unpublished M.A. thesis, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor.
  21. Ford, 1949, Cultural dating of prehistoric sites in Virú Valley, Peru, American Museum of Natural History, Anthropological Papers, 43, 29
  22. Ford, 1952, Measurements of some prehistoric design developments in the southeastern states, American Museum of Natural History, Anthropological Papers, 44, 313
  23. Ford, 1962, A quantitative method for deriving cultural chronology, Pan American Union
  24. Gilinsky, 1986, The evolutionary bootstrap: A new approach to the study of taxonomic diversity, Paleobiology, 12, 251, 10.1017/S0094837300013762 · DOI
  25. Gilinsky, 1989, Asymmetries of clade shape and the direction of evolutionary time, Science, 243, 1613, 10.1126/science.243.4898.1613 · DOI
  26. Gould, 1978, Generality and uniqueness in the history of life: An exploration with random models, BioScience, 28, 277, 10.2307/1307280 · DOI
  27. Gould, 1988, Trends as changes in variance: A new slant on progress and directionality in evolution, Journal of Paleontology, 62, 319, 10.1017/S0022336000059126 · DOI · Paper page
  28. Gould, 1989, A developmental constraint in Cerion, with comments on the definition and interpretation of constraint in evolution, Evolution, 43, 516, 10.2307/2409056 · DOI
  29. Gould, 1977, The shape of evolution: A comparison of real and random clades, Paleobiology, 3, 23, 10.1017/S009483730000508X · DOI
  30. Hughes, 1998, Getting to the point: Evolutionary change in prehistoric weaponry, Journal of Archaeological Method and Theory, 5, 345, 10.1007/BF02428421 · DOI
  31. Hutchinson, 1981, Random adaptation and imitation in human evolution, American Scientist, 69, 161
  32. Jones, 1989, Comment on “Diversity, organization, and behavior in the material record” by M. J. Shott, Current Anthropology, 30, 305
  33. Kidder, 1917, A design-sequence from New Mexico, National Academy of Sciences, Proceedings, 3, 369, 10.1073/pnas.3.5.369 · DOI
  34. Kintigh, 1984, Measuring archaeological diversity by comparison with simulated assemblages, American Antiquity, 49, 44, 10.2307/280511 · DOI
  35. Kirchner, 1998, No fractals in fossil extinction statistics, Nature, 395, 337, 10.1038/26384 · DOI
  36. Kitchell, 1988, Macroevolutionary interpretations of symmetry and synchroneity in the fossil record, Science, 240, 1190, 10.1126/science.240.4856.1190 · DOI
  37. Kitchell, 1989, Response (to Gilinsky et al.), Science, 243, 1614, 10.1126/science.243.4898.1614 · DOI · Paper page
  38. Krieger, 1944, The typological concept, American Antiquity, 9, 271, 10.2307/275785 · DOI · Paper page
  39. Kroeber, 1940, Stimulus diffusion, American Anthropologist, 42, 1, 10.1525/aa.1940.42.1.02a00020 · DOI
  40. Leonard, 1987, Elements of an inclusive evolutionary model for archaeology, Journal of Anthropological Archaeology, 6, 199, 10.1016/0278-4165(87)90001-8 · DOI · Paper page
  41. Lipo, 1997, Population structure, cultural transmission, and frequency seriation, Journal of Anthropological Archaeology, 16, 301, 10.1006/jaar.1997.0314 · DOI
  42. Lyman, 1998, The goals of evolutionary archaeology: History and explanation, Current Anthropology, 39, 615, 10.1086/204786 · DOI
  43. Lyman, 1998, Seriation, superposition, and interdigitation: A history of Americanist graphic depictions of culture change, American Antiquity, 63, 239, 10.2307/2694696 · DOI
  44. McCartney, 1990, Simulation models and the interpretation of archaeological diversity, American Antiquity, 55, 521, 10.2307/281282 · DOI
  45. Meltzer, 1981, A study of style and function in a class of tools, Journal of Field Archeology, 8, 313, 10.1179/009346981791504914 · DOI
  46. Meltzer, 1992, The relationship between sample size and diversity in archaeological assemblages, Journal of Archaeological Science, 19, 375, 10.1016/0305-4403(92)90056-9 · DOI
  47. Miller, 1988, Modeling bivalve diversification: The effect of interaction on a macroevolutionary system, Paleobiology, 14, 364, 10.1017/S0094837300012100 · DOI
  48. Neff, 1992, Ceramics and evolution, Archaeological Method and Theory, 4, 141
  49. Neff, 1993, Theory, sampling, and analytical technique in the archaeological study of prehistoric ceramics, American Antiquity, 58, 23, 10.2307/281452 · DOI
  50. Neiman, 1995, Stylistic variation in evolutionary perspective: Inferences from decorative diversity and interassemblage distance in Illinois Woodland ceramic assemblages, American Antiquity, 60, 7, 10.2307/282074 · DOI
  51. O'Brien, 1990, Variation, selection, and the archaeological record, Archaeological Method and Theory, 2, 31
  52. O'Brien, 1992, The role of adaptation in archaeological explanation, American Antiquity, 57, 3, 10.2307/2694834 · DOI · Paper page
  53. O'Brien, 1998, Basic incompatibilities between evolutionary and behavioral archaeology, American Antiquity, 63, 485, 10.2307/2694632 · DOI
  54. O'Connell, 1994, Surprise Valley projectile points and their chronological implications, Journal of California and Great Basin Anthropology, 16, 162
  55. Patterson, 1988, Periodicity in extinction: The role of systematics, Ecology, 70, 802, 10.2307/1941349 · DOI
  56. Patterson, 1963, Contemporaneity and cross-dating in archaeological interpretation, American Antiquity, 28, 389, 10.2307/278283 · DOI
  57. Petrie, 1899, Sequences in prehistoric remains, Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute of Great Britain and Ireland, 29, 295, 10.2307/2843012 · DOI
  58. Phillips, 1951, Archaeological survey in the lower Mississippi Valley, 1940–1947, Peabody Museum of American Archaeology and Ethnology
  59. Phillips, 1953, Method and theory in American archaeology: An operational basis for culture-historical integration, American Anthropologist, 55, 615, 10.1525/aa.1953.55.5.02a00030 · DOI
  60. Prothero, 1985, North American mammalian diversity and Eocene-Oligocene extinctions, Paleobiology, 11, 389, 10.1017/S0094837300011696 · DOI
  61. Raup, 1977, Probabilistic models in evolutionary paleobiology, American Scientist, 65, 50
  62. Raup, 1974, Stochastic simulation and evolution of morphology—Towards a nomothetic paleontology, Systematic Zoology, 23, 305, 10.2307/2412538 · DOI
  63. Raup, 1973, Stochastic models of phylogeny and the evolution of diversity, Journal of Geology, 81, 525, 10.1086/627905 · DOI
  64. Rhode, 1988, Measurement of archaeological diversity and the sample-size effect, American Antiquity, 53, 708, 10.2307/281114 · DOI
  65. Rosenberg, 1994, Pattern, process, and hierarchy in the evolution of culture, Journal of Anthropological Archaeology, 13, 307, 10.1006/jaar.1994.1017 · DOI
  66. Rouse, 1939, Prehistory in Haiti: A study in method, Yale University Publications in Anthropology No. 21
  67. Rouse, 1955, On the correlation of phases of culture, American Anthropologist, 57, 713, 10.1525/aa.1955.57.4.02a00050 · DOI
  68. Rowe, 1961, Stratigraphy and seriation, American Antiquity, 26, 324, 10.2307/277399 · DOI
  69. Schiffer, 1996, Some relationships between behavioral and evolutionary archaeologies, American Antiquity, 61, 643, 10.2307/282009 · DOI
  70. Sepkoski, 1981, Phanerozoic marine diversity and the fossil record, Nature, 293, 435, 10.1038/293435a0 · DOI
  71. Shott, 1989, Diversity, organization, and behavior in the material record, Current Anthropology, 30, 283, 10.1086/203745 · DOI
  72. Signor, 1982, Species richness in the Phanerozoic: Compensating for sampling bias, Geology, 10, 625, 10.1130/0091-7613(1982)10<625:SRITPC>2.0.CO;2 · DOI
  73. Spencer, 1997, Evolutionary approaches in archaeology, Journal of Archaeological Research, 5, 209, 10.1007/BF02229153 · DOI
  74. Stanley, 1981, Natural clades differ from “random” clades: Simulations and analyses, Paleobiology, 7, 115, 10.1017/S0094837300003833 · DOI
  75. Stein, 1989, Where guesses come from: Evolutionary epistemology and the anomaly of guided variation, Biology and Philosophy, 4, 33, 10.1007/BF00144038 · DOI
  76. Steward, 1929, Diffusion and independent invention: A critique of logic, American Anthropologist, 31, 491, 10.1525/aa.1929.31.3.02a00070 · DOI
  77. Teltser, P. A.1995Culture history, evolutionary theory, and frequency seriation. In Evolutionary archaeology: Methodological issues, P. A. Teltser, pp. 51–68. University of Arizona Press, Tucson. · DOI
  78. Thomas, 1981, How to classify the projectile points from Monitor Valley, Nevada, Journal of California and Great Basin Anthropology, 3, 7
  79. Uhen, 1996, An evaluation of clade-shape statistics using simulations and extinct families of mammals, Paleobiology, 22, 8, 10.1017/S0094837300015980 · DOI
  80. Valentine, 1996, Hierarchies in biology and paleontology, Paleobiology, 22, 23, 10.1017/S0094837300015992 · DOI
  81. Vrba, 1989, Levels of selection and sorting with special reference to the species level, Oxford Surveys in Evolutionary Biology, 6, 111
  82. Vrba, 1986, The hierarchical expansion of sorting and selection: Sorting and selection cannot be equated, Paleobiology, 12, 217, 10.1017/S0094837300013671 · DOI · Paper page
  83. Willey, 1945, Horizon styles and pottery traditions in Peruvian archaeology, American Antiquity, 10, 49, 10.2307/275530 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Lyman, R. L., & O'Brien, M. J.
Venue
Journal of Anthropological Archaeology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2000-03
Volume
19
Issue
1
Pages
39-74
ISSN
0278-4165
Cited by
44
References
2
Language
en

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review