CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 112

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Elements of an inclusive evolutionary model for archaeology

Leonard, Robert D., Jones, George T.·1987·Journal of Anthropological Archaeology
DOI 10.1016/0278-4165(87)90001-8
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/0278-4165(87)90001-8

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Materials in the archaeological record are phenotypic in the same way that parts of organisms are.

    “As EA has pointed out time and again (Dunnell 1989;Leonard 2001;Leonard and Jones 1987;O'Brien and Holland 1995;O'Brien and Lyman 2000b), pots, projectile points, houses, and myriad other cultural features are phenotypic in the same way that animal”

    From What Is Evolution? A Response to Bamforth (2003) · cites this paper as Leonard and Jones 1987

Citations

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 20

  1. Robert, 1982, Cultural transmission and the evolution of cooperative behavior, Human Ecology, 10, 325, 10.1007/BF01531189 · DOI
  2. Braun, 1982, Evolution of “tribal” social networks: Theory and prehistoric North American evidence, American Antiquity, 47, 504, 10.2307/280232 · DOI
  3. Cowgill, 1964, The end of Classic Maya culture: A review of recent evidence, Southwestern Journal of Anthropology, 20, 145, 10.1086/soutjanth.20.2.3629323 · DOI
  4. Creamer, 1985, Tribe versus chiefdom in lower Central America, American Antiquity, 50, 738, 10.2307/280164 · DOI
  5. Dunnell, 1978, Style and function: A fundamental dichotomy, American Antiquity, 43, 192, 10.2307/279244 · DOI
  6. Dunnell, 1980, Evolutionary theory and archaeology, Vol. 3, 38
  7. Dunnell, 1982, Science, social science and common sense: The agonizing dilemma of modern archaeology, Journal of Anthropological Research, 38, 1, 10.1086/jar.38.1.3629946 · DOI
  8. Dunnell, 1984, The Americanist literature for 1983: A year of contrasts and challenges, American Journal of Archaeology, 88, 489, 10.2307/504738 · DOI
  9. Dunnell, 1985, Methodological issues in Americanist artifact classification, Vol. 9, 149
  10. Durham, 1982, Interactions of genetic and cultural evolution: Models and examples, Human Ecology, 10, 289, 10.1007/BF01531188 · DOI
  11. Hull, 1965, The effect of essentialism on taxonomy—two thousand years of stasis, British Journal of Philosophy of Science, 15, 2, 10.1093/bjps/XV.60.314 · DOI
  12. King, 1969, Non-Darwinian evolution, Science, 164, 788, 10.1126/science.164.3881.788 · DOI
  13. Kirch, 1980, The archeological study of adaptation: Theoretical and methodological issues, Vol. 3, 101
  14. Peebles, 1977, Some archaeological correlates of ranked societies, American Antiquity, 42, 421, 10.2307/279066 · DOI
  15. Rindos, 1985, Darwinian selection, symbolic variation, and the evolution of culture, Current Anthropology, 26, 65, 10.1086/203227 · DOI
  16. Sabloff, 1967, The collapse of Maya civilization in the southern lowlands: A consideration of history and process, Southwestern Journal of Anthropology, 23, 311, 10.1086/soutjanth.23.4.3629449 · DOI
  17. Sober, 1980, Evolution, population thinking, and essentialism, Philosophy of Science, 47, 350, 10.1086/288942 · DOI
  18. Spinden, 1928, Civilizations of Mexico and Central America, American Museum of Natural History, Handbook Series No. 3
  19. Wenke, 1981, Eplaining the evolution of cultural complexity: A review, Vol. 4, 79
  20. Yoffee, 1979, The decline and rise of Mesopotamian civilization: An ethnoarchaeological perspective on the evolution of social complexity, American Antiquity, 44, 5, 10.2307/279187 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Leonard, R. D., & Jones, G. T.
Venue
Journal of Anthropological Archaeology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
1987-09
Volume
6
Issue
3
Pages
199-219
ISSN
0278-4165
DOI
10.1016/0278-4165(87)90001-8
Cited by
112
References
0
Language
en
Licence
www.elsevier.com/tdm/userlicense/1.0/ (tdm)

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review