ESR Dating of Micoquian Industry and Neanderthal Remains at Kůlna Cave, Czech Republic
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The paper's δ13C values compare favorably to those in a similar study of dinosaur δ13C values (-23 to -27) from the Judith River formation in Alberta, Canada.
“Our δ 13 C values compare favorably to those in a similar study of dinosaur δ 13 C values (-23 to -27) from the Judith River formation in Alberta, Canada [20] See Table 3.”
From The Search for Solutions to Mysterious Anomalies in the Geologic Column (2019) · cites this paper as [20]
[20] found nitrogen content in 24 samples of bones from various species of dinosaurs in the Late Cretaceous Judith River Formation in Alberta, Canada, that was much higher than the nitrogen content of any of the paper's dinosaur bones.
“[20] found nitrogen content in 24 samples of bones from various species of dinosaurs found in the Late Cretaceous Judith River Formation in Alberta, Canada that was much higher than the nitrogen content of any of our dinosaur bones.”
From The Search for Solutions to Mysterious Anomalies in the Geologic Column (2019) · cites this paper as [20]
These licensed, professional laboratories follow the protocols developed over a period of 60 years, as reported in the journal Radiocarbon [20] and elsewhere.
“These licensed, professional laboratories follow the protocols developed over a period of 60 years, as reported in the journal Radiocarbon [20] and elsewhere.”
From The Search for Solutions to Mysterious Anomalies in the Geologic Column (2019) · cites this paper as [20]
Cited by
Sorted by citations
The Search for Solutions to Mysterious Anomalies in the Geologic Column
(2019) · Geology, Earth & Marine Sciences · doi:10.31038/gems.2019114 · Cited by 2 · see citing works
- Authors
- Rink, W. J., Schwarcz, H. P., Valoch, K., Seitl, L., & Stringer, C. B.
- Affiliations
- McMaster University (CA)
- Moravian Museum (CZ)
- Natural History Museum (GB)
- Venue
- Journal of Archaeological Science
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 1996-11
- Volume
- 23
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 889-901
- ISSN
- 0305-4403 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2041899440
- Cited by
- 48
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 2 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 1
- FWCI
- 11.51
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of Archaeological Science (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- Leakey Foundation
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Anthropology › Pleistocene-Era Hominins and Archaeology
- Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Paleontology › Archaeology and ancient environmental studies
- Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Atmospheric Science › Geology and Paleoclimatology Research
- Keywords
- Neanderthals, electron spin resonance dating, U-series dating, interstadials, Pleistocene stratigraphy, dose rate distribution, lithic chronology, paleoclimate
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review