Cited by 333

A procedure to measure amylose in cereal starches and flours with concanavalin A

Gibson, T.S., Solah, V.A., McCleary, B.V.·1997·Journal of Cereal Science

Abstract

A modified procedure for the determination of amylose in cereal starches and flours based on complex formation between the lectin concanavalin A (Con A) and amylopectin has been developed and characterised. The assay format is suitable for multi-sample analysis, allowing the analysis of up to 20 samples per day. In the procedure the amylopectin in a solubilised lipid-free starch sample is precipitated by reaction with Con A and removed by centrifugation. The amylose remaining in the supernatant is then determined after amylolytic hydrolysis to glucose and expressed as a proportion (%) of the glucose derived from amylolytic hydrolysis of the total starch in a separate aliquot of the solubilised sample (i.e. prior to Con A treatment). The Con A procedure correlates well (r > 0.993) with existing Con A-based and iodine-based procedures and yields a linear standard curve for starch samples containing from approximately 0 to approximately 100% amylose. Advantages of this modified Con A procedure for amylose determination include its applicability to flour samples without the need for prior starch purification; it allows the simultaneous estimation of total starch and does not require a calibration curve. Repeated analyses of a set of samples yielded repeatability (within laboratory) relative standard deviations of < 5% for pure starches and approximately 10% for flours. A commercially available assay kit has been developed to facilitate the use of the Con A procedure in routine am…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1006/jcrs.1996.0086

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cited by

Authors
Gibson, T. S., Solah, V. A., & McCleary, B. V.
Venue
Journal of Cereal Science
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
1997-03
Volume
25
Issue
2
Pages
111-119
ISSN
0733-5210
Cited by
333
References
0
Language
en

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review