Ultrasonication-induced modifications in functional, thermal, and structural properties of chickpea flour under different time and temperature conditions
AI snapshot
Written from the paper’s full text.
TL;DR
High-intensity ultrasound modified chickpea flour functionality in a time- and temperature-dependent way, with short/moderate treatments preserving gel elasticity while increasing solubility, and prolonged or high-temperature treatments promoting aggregation and weakening viscoelastic networks. Structural changes were mainly physical and selective within amorphous regions, as gelatinisation temperatures and FTIR chemical structure remained largely unchanged.
Key findings
- Ultrasonication significantly increased water solubility index in all treated samples, with the highest values at S-50°C (10.71 ± 0.58%), S-40°C (10.05 ± 0.80%), and S-20min (10.01 ± 0.41%). Water absorption capacity was reduced in all ultrasound-treated samples except S-10min and S-50°C, which remained comparable to the control.
- Particle size first decreased after 10 min (D50 from 61.6 ± 6.1 µm in control to 45.1 ± 1.2 µm), then increased with prolonged treatment (up to ~89 µm for 20–40 min) and reached 128.0 ± 1.8 µm at 50°C, indicating fragmentation followed by aggregation. Damaged starch was highest in S-40min and S-50°C (both 0.7 ± 0.0%) versus control (0.4 ± 0.1%).
- Gelatinisation temperatures and enthalpy were largely unaffected; however, To gel increased for the 40 min treatment. FTIR showed no new absorption peaks, and XRD indicated only minor, non-significant crystallinity changes, with a numerical decrease at 40 min (38.6 ± 3.3%) versus control (44.3 ± 2.2%).
- Rheology showed G′ > G″ across all conditions, confirming gel-like behaviour, but prolonged or high-temperature ultrasonication reduced G′0 and G″0; S-50°C had the lowest G′0 (44.81 ± 11.33 Pa) compared with control (126.28 ± 49.61 Pa). PCA explained 63% of total variance (PC1: 35%; PC2: 28%), separating samples along a gel-strength-versus-solubility axis.
Methods
- Whole chickpea flour dispersions (25% w/w, 800 mL) were ultrasonicated with a Q700 processor at 20 kHz, 80% amplitude (~96 W), using a 25.4 mm sonotrode. Treatments were either at 20°C for 10, 20, 25, 30, or 40 min, or at 20, 30, 40, or 50°C for 10 min. Samples were freeze-dried, ground, sieved to <250 µm, and adjusted to 10–12% moisture.
- Analyses included hydration properties (WAC, WAI, WSI, SP), amylose/amylopectin/damaged starch kits, particle size distribution by laser diffraction, SEM, DSC, FTIR, XRD, and rheological amplitude/frequency sweeps fitted to a power-law model.
- Statistical analysis used one-way ANOVA or Welch’s ANOVA with Tukey’s HSD or Games–Howell post hoc tests (p < 0.05), plus PCA on 9 flour samples and 18 variables.
Limitations
- The paper states that amylose and amylopectin results should be interpreted with caution because the Megazyme kit relies on enzymatic debranching and iodine binding, which can be affected by ultrasonication-induced structural changes, non-starch components, and limited repeatability.
- The paper notes that FTIR may not be sufficiently sensitive to detect subtle molecular rearrangements and that infrared spectral ratios show a weak correlation with actual crystallinity. PCA explained only 63% of total variance and is described as a simplified representation to be interpreted as general trends.
- Evident from the text: the study used a single flour concentration (25% w/w), one ultrasound amplitude/frequency, and a limited set of sub-gelatinisation conditions, so the findings may not generalize to other processing setups or chickpea flour compositions.
Model-written summary. Check it against the paper before relying on it.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
6 of 36 cited sources checked · 1 supported · 0 flagged · accuracy not yet measured
- Findingown data§ A B S T R A C T · p. 1
Principal component analysis separated samples along a gelstrength-versus-solubility axis that mirrored the processing continuum.
“Principal component analysis separated samples along a gelstrength-versus-solubility axis that mirrored the processing continuum.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data§ 2.3.1. Hydration properties · p. 5
Ultrasonication significantly increased WSI in all treated samples compared to the control.
“Ultrasonication significantly increased WSI in all treated samples compared to the control, with the highest solubility observed in S-50 ◦ (10.71 ± 0.58%), followed by S-40 ◦ (10.05 ± 0.80%) and S-20min (10.01 ± 0.41%).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data§ A B S T R A C T · p. 1
FTIR analysis confirmed the absence of new covalent bonds in ultrasonicated chickpea flour.
“FTIR analysis confirmed the absence of new covalent bonds, indicating that changes were physical rather than chemical.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data§ 2.3.2. Starch composition of samples · p. 5
Samples subjected to shorter ultrasonication times or lower temperatures displayed only slight, non-significant increases in damaged starch.
“In contrast, samples subjected to shorter ultrasonication times or lower temperatures displayed only slight, non-significant increases.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data§ 2.3.5. Evaluation of short-range molecular order and long-range crystallinity · p. 8
Ultrasonication induced changes in the degree of crystallinity depended on the treatment conditions.
“Ultrasonication induced changes in the degree of crystallinity depended on the treatment conditions.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
- Findingreasoning§ 2.3.6. Rheological properties · p. 11
Ultrasonication at higher temperatures (50°C) resulted in the lowest η* across all frequencies.
“ultrasonication at higher temperatures (50 ◦ C) resulted in the lowest η * across all frequencies”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data§ 2.3.6. Rheological properties · p. 11
Other ultrasonicated samples treated under different conditions followed a similar trend, with η* decreasing with frequency.
“Other ultrasonicated samples treated under different conditions followed a similar trend, with the η * decreasing with frequency”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data§ 2.3.7. Principal component analysis · p. 12
The positive pole of PC2 is marked by DS, To gel, and Tc gel, and 1047/1022, indicating partially disrupted but reorganised structures.
“Positive pole is marked by DS, To gel, and Tc gel, and 1047/1022, indi cating partially disrupted but reorganised structures.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data§ 2.3.7. Principal component analysis · p. 12
Intermediate treatments (e.g., S-25 min and S-30°) were positioned near the centre, indicating a balance between structural integrity and modification.
“Intermediate treatments (e.g., S-25 min and S-30 ◦ ) were positioned near the centre, indicating a bal ance between structural integrity and modification.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data§ 2.3.5. Evaluation of short-range molecular order and long-range crystallinity · p. 8
A slight numerical decrease in the 1022/995 ratio of the treated samples compared to the control was observed.
“However, a slight numerical decrease in the 1022/995 ratio of the treated samples compared to the control was observed, which may indicate a reduction in amorphous content or changes in the hydration state of starch helices, indicating the weakening of short-range order caused by cavitation (Hu et al., 2019; Monroy et al., 2018).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data§ 2.3.6. Rheological properties · p. 9
As frequency increased, the η* of the 20 min sample decreased gradually.
“As frequency increased, the η * of the 20 min sample decreased gradually”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data§ 2.3.4. Thermal properties analysis by DSC · p. 6
Ultrasound treatment had minimal impact on the gelatinisation temperatures (To gel, Tp gel, Tc gel) and the enthalpy of gelatinisation (ΔHgel) in most flour samples compared with the control.
“As shown in Table 3, ultrasound treatment had minimal impact on the gelatinisation temperatures (To gel , Tp gel, and Tc gel) and the enthalpy of gelatinisation ( Δ Hgel) in most flour samples compared with the control.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data§ 2.3.7. Principal component analysis · p. 11
The first two principal components explained 63% of the total variance (PC1: 35%; PC2: 28%).
“The first two principal components explained 63% of the total variance (PC1: 35%; PC2: 28%).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data§ 2.3.6. Rheological properties · p. 11
PCA grouped short-to-moderate treatments together based on higher amylose content, swelling power, and elastic behaviour.
“This inter pretation is supported by PCA (section 2.3.7), which grouped these treatments together based on higher amylose content, swelling power, and elastic behaviour.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data§ 2.3.3. Particle size analysis and morphology · p. 6
The untreated chickpea flour exhibited smooth, predominantly spherical to oval granules with well-defined surfaces.
“The untreated chickpea flour exhibited smooth, predominantly spherical to oval granules with well-defined surfaces.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingcitation§ 2.3.4. Thermal properties analysis by DSC · p. 6
For most ultrasonicated samples, gelatinisation temperatures remained unchanged.
“For most ultrasonicated samples, gelatinisation temperatures remained unchanged, suggesting that the ultrasound temperature used -applied sub-gelatinisation temperature -did not significantly disrupt the crystalline order of the starch granules and primarily caused degradation of the amorphous regions, which are rich in amylose (Amini et al., 2015).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingreasoning§ 2.3.6. Rheological properties · p. 9
At lower frequencies, the non-ultrasonicated sample and the sample treated for 20 min exhibited the highest complex viscosity (η*).
“At lower frequencies, the non-ultrasonicated sample and the sample treated for 20 min exhibited the highest η *”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingreasoning§ 2.3.3. Particle size analysis and morphology · p. 6
With prolonged ultrasonication (20-40 min), D50 increased again (up to ~89 μm).
“However, with prolonged ultrasonication (20 -40 min), D50 increased again (up to ~89 μ m), suggesting partial reaggregation of fragmented particles, an effect previously reported in ultrasonicated sweet potato and corn starch (Amini et al., 2015; Wang et al., 2020).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data§ 2.3.3. Particle size analysis and morphology · p. 6
The median particle size (D50) of the untreated flour was 61.6 ± 6.10 μm.
“The median particle size (D50) of the untreated flour was 61.6 ± 6.10 μ m.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingreasoning§ 2.3.7. Principal component analysis · p. 12
S-20 min was positioned on the negative side of PC2, indicating greater preservation of crystalline order.
“In contrast S-20 min was positioned on the negative side of PC2, indicating greater preservation of crystalline order.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data§ 2.3.7. Principal component analysis · p. 12
Negative PC2 values were linked to higher crystallinity and more ordered double-helixes structures (1022/995), representing less disrupted starch domains.
“Negative PC2 values were linked to higher crystallinity and more ordered doublehelixes structures (1022/995), representing less disrupted starch domains.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingnone given§ 3. Conclusion · p. 12
The 20 min treatment transiently enhanced molecular ordering and viscoelastic moduli.
“as it transiently enhanced molecular ordering and viscoelastic moduli, supporting stronger dough networks.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data§ 2.3.3. Particle size analysis and morphology · p. 6
Ultrasonication significantly altered particle size distribution.
“Particle size analysis (Table 2, Fig. S1) demonstrated that ultrasonication significantly altered particle size distribution.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data§ 2.3.6. Rheological properties · p. 9
The coefficients of determination (R2) for both elastic and viscous modulus were in the range of 0.912 to 0.972, indicating good model fitting.
“The coefficients of determination (R 2 ) for both elastic and viscous modulus were in the range of 0.912 to 0.972, indicating good model fitting.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Interpretationown data§ A B S T R A C T · p. 1
Ultrasound-induced changes in chickpea flour were physical rather than chemical.
“FTIR analysis confirmed the absence of new covalent bonds, indicating that changes were physical rather than chemical.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationcitation§ 2.3.4. Thermal properties analysis by DSC · p. 8
Ultrasound treatment primarily affects hydration and rheological properties rather than fundamentally altering the gelatinisation behaviour of starch.
“This suggests that ultrasound treatment primarily affects hydration and rheological properties rather than fundamentally altering the gelatinisation behaviour of starch (Farrokhi et al., 2025b; Jin et al., 2025; Roohi et al., 2024).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 3 sources checked - Interpretationreasoning§ 2.3.4. Thermal properties analysis by DSC · p. 6
As a result, a modest increase in thermal energy was required to break these more ordered regions during gelatinisation.
“As a result, a modest increase in thermal energy was required to break these more ordered regions during gelatinisation.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning§ 2.3.5. Evaluation of short-range molecular order and long-range crystallinity · p. 8
The observed reductions in crystallinity at extended ultrasonication times are likely due to indirect effects stemming from the disruption of the surrounding amorphous matrix.
“Therefore, the observed reductions in crystallinity at extended ultrasonication times are likely due to indirect effects stemming from the disruption of the surrounding amorphous matrix.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Interpretationcitation§ 2.3.3. Particle size analysis and morphology · p. 6
The behaviour of D50 increase can be attributed to intense shear forces, pressure gradients, and microjets generated by cavitation bubble collapse, which erode and fracture granules while simultaneously disrupting their aggregation structure.
“This behaviour can be attributed to the intense shear forces, pressure gradients, and microjets generated by cavitation bubble collapse, which erode and fracture the granules while simultaneously disrupting their aggregation structure (Zheng et al., 2013).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Zheng et al., 2013 source
- Interpretationreasoning§ 3. Conclusion · p. 12
These findings establish ultrasound as a versatile, clean-label tool for tailoring the functionality of chickpea flour across diverse food applications.
“Overall, these findings establish ultrasound as a versatile, clean-label tool for tailoring the functionality of chickpea flour across diverse food applications.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim- Rests on an assumption: Rheological and functional properties measured in chickpea flour systems predict performance in final food products such as dough, pasta, and meat analogues.
- Interpretationreasoning§ 2.3.6. Rheological properties · p. 11
The lowest η* for 50°C ultrasonication indicates more pronounced disruption of the gel network due to thermal and ultrasonic effects.
“indicating more pronounced disruption of the gel network due to thermal and ultrasonic effects.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisecitation§ 2.3.6. Rheological properties · p. 9
The shear thinning behaviour of the samples is typical of gel-like systems where structural rearrangements reduce resistance to flow.
“which is typical of gel-like systems where structural rear rangements reduce resistance to flow (Varchanis et al., 2022).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Varchanis et al., 2022 source
Checked before — its earlier verdict is held back until a new check runs.
- Interpretationown data§ 2.3.7. Principal component analysis · p. 12
PC2 captures differences in structural order and thermal stability.
“PC2 captures differences in structural order and thermal stability.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Interpretationown data§ 2.3.5. Evaluation of short-range molecular order and long-range crystallinity · p. 8
The variations observed among the treated samples are likely due to random molecular rearrangements rather than consistent structural modification.
“The variations observed among the treated samples are therefore likely due to random molecular rearrangements rather than consistent structural modification.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning§ 2.3.3. Particle size analysis and morphology · p. 6
The increase in D50 with prolonged ultrasonication suggests partial reaggregation of fragmented particles.
“However, with prolonged ultrasonication (20 -40 min), D50 increased again (up to ~89 μ m), suggesting partial reaggregation of fragmented particles, an effect previously reported in ultrasonicated sweet potato and corn starch (Amini et al., 2015; Wang et al., 2020).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked - Interpretationcitation§ 2.3.4. Thermal properties analysis by DSC · p. 6
The increase in To gel for 40 min treatment may suggest partial reorganisation or compaction of starch structures during prolonged ultrasonication, leading to increased resistance to initial swelling and requiring more energy input to initiate gelatinisation.
“This shift may suggest partial reorganisation or compaction of starch structures during prolonged ultrasonication, leading to increased resistance to initial swelling and requiring more energy input to initiate gelatinisation (Farrokhi et al., 2025a).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Farrokhi et al., 2025a
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Interpretationreasoning§ 2.3.6. Rheological properties · p. 11
The observed reduction in G' and G'' under prolonged or high-temperature ultrasonication indicates weaker gel networks.
“the observed reduction in G ʹ and G ʹ ʹ under prolonged or high-temperature ultrasonication indicates weaker gel networks”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationown data§ 2.3.5. Evaluation of short-range molecular order and long-range crystallinity · p. 8
The chemical structure of chickpea flour remained unchanged after ultrasound treatment.
“confirming that the chemical structure of chickpea flour remained unchanged.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Interpretationown data§ 2.3.3. Particle size analysis and morphology · p. 6
Temperature also influenced fragmentation.
“Temperature also influenced fragmentation.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning§ 2.3.2. Starch composition of samples · p. 5
The apparent inconsistencies in amylose and amylopectin values may partly reflect methodological limitations.
“It should be noted that the apparent inconsistencies in amylose and amylopectin values may partly reflect methodological limitations.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning§ 2.3.7. Principal component analysis · p. 12
Excessive ultrasonication leading to high solubilization and aggregation (e.g., at 50°C) may weaken gel structure, limiting applicability in products requiring structural integrity, such as bread or meat analogues.
“However, excessive ultrasonication leading to high solubilization and aggregation (e.g., at 50 ◦ C) may weaken gel structure, limiting applicability in products requiring structural integrity, such as bread or meat analogues.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: Rheological and functional properties measured in chickpea flour systems predict performance in final food products such as dough, pasta, and meat analogues.
- Interpretationown data§ 2.3.6. Rheological properties · p. 9
The high η* of the control and 20 min sample at lower frequencies reflects a relatively strong gel network capable of resisting deformation.
“reflecting a relatively strong gel network capable of resisting deformation.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationcitation§ 2.3.2. Starch composition of samples · p. 5
Temperature and ultrasonication intensity played key roles in starch modification.
“Consistent with previous findings on corn starch (Amini et al., 2015), temperature and ultrasonication intensity played key roles in starch modification.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Amini et al., 2015 source
- Interpretationown data§ 2.3.7. Principal component analysis · p. 12
PC1 primarily reflects a transition from structurally intact, elastic systems to more solubilised and weakly structured matrices.
“PC1 primarily reflects a transition from structurally intact, elastic systems to more solubilised and weakly structured matrices.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
- Classified as probably not a substantial claim. 13
- May combine two claims. 60
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Premisecitation§ A B S T R A C T · p. 2Chickpea flour typically contains 20-25% protein, mainly globulins (legumin and vicilin) and glutelins, along with 52-71% starch, dietary fibre (6-15%), and essential micronutrients.
“Chickpea flour typically contains 20 -25% protein, mainly globulins (legumin and vicilin) and glutelins, along with 52 -71% starch, dietary fibre (6 -15%), and essential micronutrients”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 2 sources checked- cites Kaur & Prasad, 2021 source
- cites Noordraven et al., 2021 source
The Introduction (page unavailable in our copy) says chickpea flours contain amino acids and describes chickpeas as a source of vitamins and minerals. It also discusses starch in chickpea flour. It does not give the claimed protein, starch, or fibre percentages, or identify globulins, legumin, vicilin, or glutelins as the main proteins. (LLM, conf=0.87)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
May combine two claims.
Premisecitation§ A B S T R A C T · p. 2Ultrasound induces acoustic cavitation, generating localised high temperatures and pressures that can alter the physicochemical and structural properties of starch and proteins.
“Ultrasound induces acoustic cavitation, generating localised high temperatures and pressures that can alter the physicochemical and structural properties of starch and proteins”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites Xiong et al., 2024 source
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Premisecitation§ A B S T R A C T · p. 2Ultrasound processing has attracted increasing attention as a green, non-thermal technology suitable for modifying biopolymers in flours and starches.
“Among them, ultrasound processing has attracted increasing attention as a green, non-thermal technology suitable for modifying biopolymers in flours and starches”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 2 sources checked- cites Farrokhi et al., 2025b
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- cites Vela et al., 2024 source
The Introduction describes growing interest in green physical methods, including ultrasound, for modifying starches and flours; the Conclusions call ultrasound a clean modification technology. But Section 2 says cavitation can have a strong thermal effect, and Section 5 says cooling may be needed. The unqualified description of the process as non-thermal is therefore not supported. (LLM, conf=0.87)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
May combine two claims.
Interpretationcitation§ 2.3.1. Hydration properties · p. 5The protein matrix in legume flours may limit swelling behaviour compared to pure starch, potentially explaining the observed decline even under high-temperature ultrasonication treatments.
“Moreover, the protein matrix in legume flours may limit swelling behaviour compared to pure starch (Zhang et al., 2025), potentially explaining the observed decline even under high-temperature ultrasonication treatments.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites Zhang et al., 2025 source
Section 3.2 (page unavailable) says proteins and other non-starch components can resist water absorption and swelling, and reports increased swelling after proteins are removed from rice starch. This supports the proposed mechanism, but the paper does not establish the specific comparison between legume flours and pure starch. The high-temperature ultrasonication explanation is the citing authors’ interpretation, not a finding attributed to Zhang et al. (LLM, conf=0.81)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
May combine two claims.
Interpretationcitation§ 2.3.6. Rheological properties · p. 9These interactions, together with the formation of shorter chains, have greater potential for hydrogen bonding with water molecules, promoting the formation of a stronger and more cohesive elastic network.
“These interactions, together with the formation of shorter chains have greater potential for hydrogen bonding with water molecules, promoting the formation of a stronger and more cohesive elastic network (Monroy et al., 2018).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites Monroy et al., 2018 source
Section 3.3 (Rheological behavior) proposes that ultrasound-induced short polymer chains reassociate through hydrogen bonds to form a more elastic three-dimensional network, and reports stronger gels under more severe treatment. Section 3.1 (Microstructural analysis) separately describes water molecules hydrogen-bonding with free hydroxyl groups. The paper does not say that shorter chains bond more readily with water or that bonding with water produces the stronger network. (LLM, conf=0.87)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
May combine two claims.
Interpretationreasoning§ 2.3.6. Rheological properties · p. 11The weaker gel networks from prolonged or high-temperature ultrasonication may translate into softer doughs, less cohesive pasta, or reduced firmness in plant-based fish and meat analogues.
“which may translate into softer doughs, less cohesive pasta, or reduced firmness in plant-based fish and meat ana logues (Gurbuz et al., 2025).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites Gurbuz et al., 2025 source
The Results sections on fish and meat analogs report that processing or formulation choices can reduce hardness, supporting the possibility of less-firm analogs. They do not link reduced firmness to weaker gels caused by prolonged or high-temperature ultrasonication, and the retrieved passages do not address softer doughs or less-cohesive pasta (pages not available). (LLM, conf=0.78)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
- Rests on an assumption: Rheological and functional properties measured in chickpea flour systems predict performance in final food products such as dough, pasta, and meat analogues.
May combine two claims.
Findingown data§ 2.3.1. Hydration properties · p. 4WAC of chickpea flour was significantly reduced in all ultrasound-treated samples except S-10min and S-50°, which remained statistically comparable to the control (S-0).
“As shown in Fig. 1, WAC of chickpea flour was significantly reduced in all ultrasound-treated samples except S-10min and S-50 ◦ , which remained statistically comparable to the control (S-0).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown data§ 2.3.1. Hydration properties · p. 5The highest WSI was observed in S-50° (10.71 ± 0.58%), followed by S-40° (10.05 ± 0.80%) and S-20min (10.01 ± 0.41%).
“Ultrasonication significantly increased WSI in all treated samples compared to the control, with the highest solubility observed in S-50 ◦ (10.71 ± 0.58%), followed by S-40 ◦ (10.05 ± 0.80%) and S-20min (10.01 ± 0.41%).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown data§ A B S T R A C T · p. 1Short, moderate ultrasound treatments enhanced water solubility of chickpea flour dispersions while maintaining overall crystalline order and gel-like behaviour (G′ > G′′), despite changes in hydration-related properties.
“Short, moderate treatments enhanced water solubility while maintaining overall crystalline order and gel-like behaviour ( G ʹ > G ʹ ʹ ) , despite changes in hydration-related properties.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown data§ 3. Conclusion · p. 12Structural analyses confirmed that crystalline domains were largely preserved, with transient increases in crystallinity at 20 min that coincided with stronger viscoelastic behaviour.
“Structural analyses confirmed that crystalline domains were largely preserved, with transient increases in crystallinity at 20 min that coincided with stronger viscoelastic behaviour.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown data§ 2.3.4. Thermal properties analysis by DSC · p. 6Although the increase in ΔHgel for the S-25min sample was statistically significant, the difference was not substantial compared to the other samples.
“Although the increase in Δ Hgel for the S-25min sample was statistically significant, the difference was not substantial compared to the other samples.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingreasoning§ 2.3.6. Rheological properties · p. 11Short-to-moderate ultrasonication treatments preserve elasticity while enhancing solubility.
“short-to-moderate treatments that preserve elasticity while enhancing solubility”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown data§ 2.3.5. Evaluation of short-range molecular order and long-range crystallinity · p. 8Extended ultrasonication (e.g., 40 min) resulted in a slight numerical decrease in crystallinity (38.6 ± 3.3%), suggesting limited disruption of the ordered regions, but again without statistical significance.
“Extended ultrasonication (e.g., 40 min) resulted in a slight numerical decrease in crystallinity (38.6 ± 3.3%), suggesting limited disruption of the ordered regions, but again without statistical significance.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown data§ 2.3.7. Principal component analysis · p. 12Along PC2, samples such as S-30 min, S-40 min, S-30°, and S-40° showed moderately positive scores, corresponding to partially organised structures with increased thermal resistance.
“Along PC2, samples such as S-30 min, S-40 min, S-30 ◦ , and S-40 ◦ , showed moderately positive scores, corresponding to partially organised structures with increased thermal resistance.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown data§ 2.3.2. Starch composition of samples · p. 5Samples treated for 40 min and those processed at 50°C exhibited the highest damaged starch contents (both 0.7 ± 0.0), showing a significant increase compared to the untreated control (0.4 ± 0.1%).
“Samples treated for 40 min and those processed at 50 ◦ C exhibited the highest damaged starch contents (both samples with a value of 0.7 ± 0.0), showing a significant increase compared to the untreated control (0.4 ± 0.1%).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown data§ 2.3.5. Evaluation of short-range molecular order and long-range crystallinity · p. 8No new absorption peaks appeared in the FTIR spectra of treated samples, confirming that the chemical structure of chickpea flour remained unchanged.
“No new absorption peaks appeared in the FTIR spectra of treated samples, confirming that the chemical structure of chickpea flour remained unchanged.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown data§ 2.3.5. Evaluation of short-range molecular order and long-range crystallinity · p. 8The effect of temperature during ultrasonication (30-50°C) was less pronounced; crystallinity values under these conditions remained statistically similar to those of the control, indicating that thermal input alone does not significantly affect structural order.
“The effect of temperature during ultrasonication (30 -50 ◦ C) was less pronounced. Crystallinity values under these conditions remained statistically similar to those of the control, indicating that thermal input alone does not significantly affect structural order.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingnone given§ 3. Conclusion · p. 12Prolonged or high-temperature treatments (≥40 min or 50°C) maximised solubility and reduced viscosity.
“prolonged or high-temperature treatments ( ≥ 40 min or 50 ◦ C) maximised solubility and reduced viscosity”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown data§ 2.3.1. Hydration properties · p. 5The swelling power (SP) of chickpea flour decreased progressively with more intense ultrasound conditions, with the lowest swelling measured in the S-50° sample (6.10 ± 0.06 g/g).
“Unlike WSI, the SP of chickpea flour tended to decrease progressively with more intense ultrasound conditions, with the lowest swelling measured in S-50 ◦ (6.10 ± 0.06 g/g).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown data§ 2.3.7. Principal component analysis · p. 12The positive side of PC1 was dominated by (D90-D10)/D50, supported by G', WAI, SP, and amylose content, indicating stronger gel networks and greater particle heterogeneity.
“The posi tive side of PC1 was dominated by ( D90 D10 ) / D50, supported by G ʹ , WAI, SP, and amylose content, indicating stronger gel networks and greater particle heterogeneity.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown data§ 2.3.6. Rheological properties · p. 9All samples exhibited shear thinning behaviour, with complex viscosity (η*) decreasing as frequency increased.
“The complex viscosity ( η *) results (Fig. 4-c) demonstrate shear thinning behaviour for all samples, as η * decreased with increasing frequency”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Findingnone given§ 2.3.2. Starch composition of samples · p. 5Amylopectin content showed an inverse numerical trend relative to amylose across the treatments.
“Similarly, amylopectin content showed an inverse numerical trend relative to amylose across the treatments.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingreasoning§ 2.3.6. Rheological properties · p. 9Prolonged ultrasonication time and elevated treatment temperatures led to a noticeable reduction in both the elastic modulus G'0 and viscous modulus G''0 compared to the control, with only slight differences observed between the two conditions.
“However, prolonged ultrasonication time and elevated treatment temperatures also led to a noticeable reduction in both the elastic modulus G ʹ 0 ) and viscous modulus (G ʹ ʹ 0 ) compared to the control, with only slight differences observed between the two conditions.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown data§ 3. Conclusion · p. 12Extended ultrasonication (20-40 min) or moderate heating (30-40°C) reduced water absorption, induced partial particle reaggregation, and weakened gel strength.
“extended ultrasonication (20 -40 min) or moderate heating (30 -40 ◦ C) reduced water absorption, induced partial particle reaggregation, and weakened gel strength.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingreasoning§ 3. Conclusion · p. 12Ultrasonication at 50°C maximised solubility but also caused pronounced particle aggregation, lower swelling power, and reduced viscosity, consistent with cavitation damage and thermal effects.
“Ultrasonication at 50 ◦ C maximised solubility but also caused pronounced particle aggregation, lower swelling power, and reduced viscosity, consistent with cavitation damage and thermal ef fects.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown data§ 2.3.3. Particle size analysis and morphology · p. 6These effects become more pronounced with increasing ultrasonication intensity and temperature, particularly in S-40min and S-50° samples, where granules appear more fragmented and aggregated.
“These effects become more pronounced with increasing ultrasonication intensity and temperature, particularly in S-40min and S-50 ◦ samples, where granules appear more fragmented and aggregated.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown data§ 2.3.2. Starch composition of samples · p. 5Changes in amylose content were inconsistent across treatments and did not follow a clear linear trend with ultrasonication time or temperature.
“However, in this study, the changes in amylose content were inconsistent across treatments and did not follow a clear linear trend with ultrasonication time or temperature (Table 2).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown data§ 2.3.7. Principal component analysis · p. 12S-50° was clearly separated on the negative side of PC1, driven by higher solubility, increased particle size, and reduced gel strength, reflecting extensive structural disruption.
“In contrast, S-50 ◦ was clearly separated on the negative side of PC1, driven by higher solubility, increased particle size, and reduced gel strength, reflecting extensive structural disruption.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown data§ 3. Conclusion · p. 12Longer treatments disrupted molecular order and reduced elasticity, although all ultrasonicated flours maintained gel-like properties.
“In contrast, longer treatments disrupted molecular order and reduced elasticity, although all ultrasonicated flours maintained gel-like properties.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingnone given§ 2.3.4. Thermal properties analysis by DSC · p. 6The enthalpy values of gelatinisation for all samples were negative, confirming the endothermic nature of the gelatinisation process.
“The enthalpy values of gelatinisation for all samples were negative, confirming the endothermic nature of the gelatinisation process.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown data§ 2.3.4. Thermal properties analysis by DSC · p. 6In our study, the To gel of chickpea flour treated for 40 min increased, indicating a delayed onset of gelatinisation.
“However, in our study, the To gel of chickpea flour treated for 40 min increased, indicating a delayed onset of gelatinisation.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown data§ 3. Conclusion · p. 12Short treatments (10 min) promoted particle fragmentation, maintained water absorption capacity, and preserved gel elasticity, without markedly altering solubility.
“Short treatments (10 min) promoted particle fragmentation, maintained water absorption capacity, and preserved gel elasticity, without markedly altering solubility”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Findingcitation§ 2.3.5. Evaluation of short-range molecular order and long-range crystallinity · p. 8The spectra exhibited characteristic peaks at ~3280 cm-1 (O-H stretching), ~2926 cm-1 (C-H stretching of aliphatic groups, linked to the presence of lipids), and ~1634 cm-1 (bending vibration of H-O-H), consistent with typical moisture- and carbohydrate-associated vibrational modes.
“In addition to the starch-specific region, the spectra (Fig. 3) also exhibited characteristic peaks at ~3280 cm 1 (O -H stretching), ~2926 cm 1 (C -H stretching of aliphatic groups, linked to the presence of lipids), and ~1634 cm 1 (bending vibration of H -O -H), consistent with typical moisture- and carbohydrate-associated vibrational modes (Garcia-Valle et al., 2021; Kumar et al., 2025).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checkedMay combine two claims.
Findingown data§ 2.3.7. Principal component analysis · p. 12The control (S-0) and short ultrasonication (S-10 min) were positioned toward the positive side of PC1, indicating preserved structural integrity and strong viscoelastic behaviour.
“As shown in Fig. 5, the control (S-0) and short ultrasonication (S10 min) were positioned toward the positive side of PC1, indicating preserved structural integrity and strong viscoelastic behaviour.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown data§ 3. Conclusion · p. 12Ultrasound processing effectively modulated the functional, structural, and rheological properties of chickpea flour, with the outcome strongly dependent on treatment duration and temperature.
“This study demonstrated that ultrasound processing effectively modulated the functional, structural, and rheological properties of chickpea flour, with the outcome strongly dependent on treatment duration and temperature.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown data§ 2.3.5. Evaluation of short-range molecular order and long-range crystallinity · p. 8The sample treated for 20 min showed a numerically higher crystallinity value (48.6 ± 4.1%), but this increase was not statistically significant compared to the control (44.3 ± 2.2%).
“Although the sample treated for 20 min showed a numerically higher crystallinity value (48.6 ± 4.1%), this increase was not statistically significant compared to the control (44.3 ± 2.2%).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Premisecitation§ A B S T R A C T · p. 2Chickpea flour has been increasingly incorporated into gluten-free and plant-based products due to its multifunctional properties.
“Chickpea flour has been increasingly incorporated into gluten-free and plant-based products, including bakery goods, extruded snacks, plant-based beverages, and even restructured meat analogues, due to its multifunctional properties”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checkedProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Premisecitation§ A B S T R A C T · p. 2Legumin and vicilin act as gel-forming hydrocolloids contributing to network formation.
“while legumin and vicilin act as gel-forming hydrocolloids contributing to network formation”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Chang et al., 2022 source
May combine two claims.
Premisecitation§ 2.3.1. Hydration properties · p. 5Ultrasound can cleave amylose chains, which are more prone to disruption than amylopectin, thereby releasing soluble polymers into the aqueous phase.
“Ultrasound can cleave amylose chains, which are more prone to disruption than amylopectin, thereby releasing soluble polymers into the aqueous phase”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 3 sources checkedProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Premisecitation§ A B S T R A C T · p. 2Chickpea amino acid profile is rich in lysine and arginine but limited in sulphur-containing amino acids, and complements cereal proteins.
“Its amino acid profile, rich in lysine and arginine but limited in sulphur-containing amino acids, complements cereal proteins”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Kaur & Prasad, 2021 source
May combine two claims.
Interpretationown data§ A B S T R A C T · p. 1Ultrasound parameters can be tuned to favour two distinct functional profiles in chickpea flour: enhanced solubility and dispersibility under shorter treatments, or modified viscoelastic networks under prolonged conditions.
“These findings indicate that ultrasound parameters can be tuned to favour two distinct functional profiles in chickpea flour: enhanced solubility and dispersibility under shorter treatments, or modified viscoelastic networks under prolonged conditions.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Premisecitation§ 2.3.1. Hydration properties · p. 5The extent of solubility enhancement in flours is known to be variable depending on composition and ultrasound conditions.
“although the extent of solubility enhancement in flours is known to be variable depending on composition and ultrasound conditions.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites Vela, Villanueva, Nathia-Neves, & Ronda, 2023
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- cites Zhu & Li, 2019 source
Checked before — its earlier verdict is held back until a new check runs.
May combine two claims.
Interpretationreasoning§ A B S T R A C T · p. 1Ultrasound is a non-thermal, clean-label technology for tailoring the structure-function relationships of hydrocolloids in chickpea flour, enabling targeted modulation of solubility, viscoelastic properties, and structural organisation for plant-based product development.
“This mechanistic understanding positions ultrasound as a non-thermal, clean-label technology for tailoring the structure-function relationships of hydrocolloids in chickpea flour, enabling targeted modulation of solubility, viscoelastic properties, and structural organisation for plant-based product development.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Premisecitation§ 2.3.5. Evaluation of short-range molecular order and long-range crystallinity · p. 8Warren et al. (2016) noted a weak correlation between infrared spectral ratios and actual crystallinity, suggesting a more complex relationship between FTIR data and structural order in starch.
“Warren et al. (2016) noted a weak correlation between infrared spectral ratios and actual crystallinity, suggesting a more complex relationship between FTIR data and structural order in starch.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Warren et al. (2016) source
May combine two claims.
Interpretationown data§ 2.3.7. Principal component analysis · p. 12The PCA reveals a clear treatment-dependent shift from structured, elastic systems toward increasingly solubilised and disordered matrices, with ultrasonication time and temperature governing the balance between fragmentation, aggregation, and functional performance.
“The PCA reveals a clear treatment-dependent shift from structured, elastic systems toward increasingly solubilised and disordered matrices, with ultrasonication time and temperature governing the balance be tween fragmentation, aggregation, and functional performance.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Interpretationown data§ 2.3.4. Thermal properties analysis by DSC · p. 6A slight increase in onset temperature or enthalpy indicates a marginal enhancement in the thermal stability of starch granules, which could delay gelatinisation during cooking or extrusion and, in turn, influence textural development in dough- or pasta-based systems.
“A slight increase in onset temperature or enthalpy indicates a marginal enhancement in the thermal stability of starch granules, which could delay gelatinisation during cooking or extrusion and, in turn, influence textural development in dough -or pasta-based systems.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Interpretationcitation§ 2.3.5. Evaluation of short-range molecular order and long-range crystallinity · p. 8The decrease in 1022/995 ratio may indicate a reduction in amorphous content or changes in the hydration state of starch helices, indicating weakening of short-range order caused by cavitation.
“However, a slight numerical decrease in the 1022/995 ratio of the treated samples compared to the control was observed, which may indicate a reduction in amorphous content or changes in the hydration state of starch helices, indicating the weakening of short-range order caused by cavitation (Hu et al., 2019; Monroy et al., 2018).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites Hu et al., 2019
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- cites Monroy et al., 2018 source
Checked before — its earlier verdict is held back until a new check runs.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable). May combine two claims.
Interpretationreasoning§ 3. Conclusion · p. 12These findings contribute to the understanding of how ultrasound modulates the structure-function relationships of starch-protein hydrocolloid systems, with implications beyond chickpea flour for the broader field of plant-based food hydrocolloids.
“These findings contribute to the understanding of how ultrasound modulates the structure-function relationships of starch-protein hydrocolloid sys tems, with implications beyond chickpea flour for the broader field of plant-based food hydrocolloids.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Premisecitation§ 2.3.5. Evaluation of short-range molecular order and long-range crystallinity · p. 8Similar results were reported for millet starch treated with ultrasonication at high temperatures and dual frequencies.
“Similar results were reported for millet starch treated with ultrasonication at high temperatures and dual frequencies (Hu et al., 2019).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Hu et al., 2019
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
May combine two claims.
Interpretationreasoning§ 2.3.4. Thermal properties analysis by DSC · p. 6Ultrasonication under these conditions may have induced mild molecular reordering, resulting in a slightly more compact or semi-crystalline internal structure, thereby marginally enhancing granule stability.
“Ultrasonication under these conditions may have induced mild molecular reordering, resulting in a slightly more compact or semi-crystalline internal structure, thereby marginally enhancing granule stability.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Interpretationreasoning§ 2.3.2. Starch composition of samples · p. 6Shorter amylose fragments may bind iodine less effectively, leading to underestimation, while debranched amylopectin chains may be overestimated as amylose.
“Shorter amylose fragments may bind iodine less effectively, leading to underestimation, while debranched amylopectin chains may be overestimated as amylose.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Interpretationreasoning§ 2.3.2. Starch composition of samples · p. 6Higher variability observed in short ultrasonication treatments (e.g., S-10 min) may reflect heterogeneous structural modification of starch granules, where partially disrupted and intact granules coexist, leading to inconsistent iodine-binding responses.
“In particular, the higher variability observed in short ultrasonication treatments (e.g., S-10 min) may reflect heterogeneous structural modification of starch granules, where partially disrupted and intact granules coexist, leading to inconsistent iodine-binding responses.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Premisecitation§ 2.3.4. Thermal properties analysis by DSC · p. 6The discrepancy in gelatinisation responses across studies can be attributed to variations in ultrasound parameters (e.g., duration, amplitude, temperature), starch type, and composition.
“The discrepancy in gelatinisation responses across studies can be attributed to variations in ultrasound parameters (e.g., duration, amplitude, temperature), starch type, and composition (Zhu, 2015).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Zhu, 2015 source
May combine two claims.
Interpretationreasoning§ 3. Conclusion · p. 12Short-to-moderate ultrasonication (10-20 min at 20-30°C) provided the most balanced functional profile: higher solubility, moderate swelling, preserved water absorption, and stable gel strength.
“short-to-moderate ultrasonication (10 -20 min at 20 -30 ◦ C) provided the most balanced functional profile: higher solubility, moderate swelling, preserved water absorption, and stable gel strength.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Interpretationreasoning§ 2.3.7. Principal component analysis · p. 12Ultrasound-induced cavitation leads to partial disruption of starch granules and simultaneous unfolding of proteins, promoting new starch-protein interactions.
“Ultrasound-induced cavitation leads to partial disruption of starch granules and simultaneous unfolding of proteins, promoting new starch -protein interactions.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Premisecitation§ 2.3.2. Starch composition of samples · p. 6Results can be sensitive to non-starch components in flours and show limited repeatability.
“Moreover, the results can be sensitive to non-starch components in flours and show limited repeatability (Gibson et al., 1997).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Gibson et al., 1997 source
May combine two claims.
Interpretationreasoning§ 2.3.3. Particle size analysis and morphology · p. 6This structural disruption likely increases surface area and facilitates the release of soluble components, which may explain the higher water solubility and modified hydration behaviour observed in ultrasonicated samples.
“This structural disruption likely increases surface area and facilitates the release of soluble components, which may explain the higher water solubility and modified hydration behaviour observed in ultrasonicated samples.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Interpretationcitation§ 2.3.4. Thermal properties analysis by DSC · p. 6The ultrasound temperature used-applied sub-gelatinisation temperature-did not significantly disrupt the crystalline order of the starch granules and primarily caused degradation of the amorphous regions, which are rich in amylose.
“For most ultrasonicated samples, gelatinisation temperatures remained unchanged, suggesting that the ultrasound temperature used -applied sub-gelatinisation temperature -did not significantly disrupt the crystalline order of the starch granules and primarily caused degradation of the amorphous regions, which are rich in amylose (Amini et al., 2015).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Amini et al., 2015 source
May combine two claims.
Interpretationreasoning§ 2.3.7. Principal component analysis · p. 12These molecular modifications reduce water-binding capacity (WAC) due to loss of intact granular structure, while increasing solubility through the release of low-molecular-weight fractions.
“These molecular modifications reduce water-binding capacity (WAC) due to loss of intact granular structure, while increasing solubility through the release of low-molecular-weight fractions.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Interpretationreasoning§ 2.3.6. Rheological properties · p. 9The transient increase in crystallinity observed for the 20 min ultrasonicated sample suggests that enhanced molecular ordering temporarily reinforces the gel network and contributes to stronger elastic properties.
“The transient increase in crystallinity observed for the 20 min ultrasonicated sample (XRD - sec tion 2.3.5) aligns with this behaviour, suggesting that enhanced mo lecular ordering temporarily reinforces the gel network and contributes to stronger elastic properties.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Interpretationown data§ 2.3.3. Particle size analysis and morphology · p. 6The SEM observations support the particle size results, indicating that cavitation-induced mechanical forces disrupt granule integrity and promote aggregation of damaged particles.
“These observations support the particle size results, indicating that cavitation-induced mechanical forces disrupt granule integrity and promote the aggregation of damaged particles.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Premisecitation§ 2.3.3. Particle size analysis and morphology · p. 6Cavitation may generate hydroxyl and hydrogen radicals from water dissociation, which can induce scission of starch molecular chains and compromise granule integrity.
“In addition, cavitation may generate hydroxyl (-OH) and hydrogen (-H) radicals from water dissociation, which can induce scission of starch molecular chains and compromise granule integrity (Wang et al., 2020).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Wang et al., 2020 source
May combine two claims.
Interpretationreasoning§ 2.3.7. Principal component analysis · p. 12This integrated interpretation highlights the central role of starch-protein interactions in governing the functional behaviour of ultrasound-treated chickpea flour and provides a basis for selecting processing conditions tailored to specific applications.
“This integrated interpretation highlights the central role of starch - protein interactions in governing the functional behaviour of ultrasound-treated chickpea flour and provides a basis for selecting processing conditions tailored to specific applications.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Interpretationreasoning§ 2.3.7. Principal component analysis · p. 12Surface damage and increased molecular mobility promote aggregation, contributing to the observed increase in particle size under more intense conditions.
“At the same time, surface damage and increased molecular mobility promote aggregation, contributing to the observed increase in particle size under more intense conditions.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Interpretationown data§ 2.3.7. Principal component analysis · p. 11PCA provides a simplified representation of the dataset and should be interpreted primarily in terms of general trends rather than exhaustive relationships.
“This in dicates that PCA provides a simplified representation of the dataset and should be interpreted primarily in terms of general trends rather than exhaustive relationships.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Interpretationown data§ 2.3.6. Rheological properties · p. 11The similar trend in other ultrasonicated samples suggests moderate structural modification without significant disruption.
“suggesting moderate structural modification without significant disruption.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Interpretationreasoning§ 2.3.7. Principal component analysis · p. 12These combined structural changes directly influence the viscoelastic properties, where moderate disruption enhances network formation through molecular interactions, while excessive fragmentation weakens the gel structure.
“These combined structural changes directly influence the viscoelastic properties, where moderate disruption enhances network formation through molecular interactions, while excessive fragmentation weakens the gel structure.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
The paper relies on this without support.
Most recent research has centred on pulse protein isolates and concentrates, which require energy-intensive extraction processes, raising sustainability and cost concerns.
“However, most recent research has centred on pulse protein isolates and concentrates, which require energy-intensive extraction processes, raising sustainability and cost concerns.”
The paper relies on this without support.
There remains a need for integrated analyses that link processing conditions to multi-scale structural and functional changes within complex biopolymer systems.
“In contrast, there remains a need for integrated analyses that link processing conditions to multi-scale structural and functional changes within complex biopolymer systems.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Temperature plays a critical role in governing cavitation intensity, molecular mobility, and structural reorganisation.
“In this context, temperature plays a critical role in governing cavitation intensity, molecular mobility, and structural reorganisation.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Rheological and functional properties measured in chickpea flour systems predict performance in final food products such as dough, pasta, and meat analogues.
“which may translate into softer doughs, less cohesive pasta, or reduced firmness in plant-based fish and meat ana logues (Gurbuz et al., 2025).”
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
Each contradiction between two passages listed here was confirmed by an independent check.
Conclusion says the 20-minute treatment enhanced viscoelastic moduli
MajorBoth fitted moduli for S-20min are lower than those of the untreated control, contrary to the conclusion that this treatment enhanced the moduli.
“The 20 min treatment is especially promising for bakery and pasta applications, as it transiently enhanced molecular ordering and viscoelastic moduli, supporting stronger dough networks.”
“| S-0 | 126.28 ± 49.61 a | 0.06 ± 0.03 ab | 92.71 ± 38.84 a | 0.05 ± 0.04 a | | S-10min | 121.30 ± 34.01 a | 0.07 ± 0.02 a | 51.31 ± 17.73 b | 0.11 ± 0.04 a | | S-20min | 90.12 ± 16.60 ab | 0.06 ± 0.03 ab | 37.49 ± 7.73 b | 0.13 ± 0.05 a |”
Gelatinisation enthalpies are called negative but tabulated as positive
MinorThe text says every gelatinisation enthalpy was negative, whereas every value in Table 3 is positive.
“The enthalpy values of gelatinisation for all samples were negative, confirming the endothermic nature of the gelatinisation process.”
“| S-0 | 65.1 ± 1.0 ab | 70.0 ± 4.0 a | 76.0 ± 1.0 a | 0.4 ± 0.1 ab |”
Recommended 20-minute range is said to preserve water absorption
MinorThe conclusion describes 10-20-minute treatment conditions as preserving water absorption, but the results identify S-10min and S-50° as the only treated samples whose WAC was not significantly reduced. Thus, S-20min did not preserve it by the paper's stated comparison.
“short-to-moderate ultrasonication (10 -20 min at 20 -30 ◦ C) provided the most balanced functional profile: higher solubility, moderate swelling, preserved water absorption, and stable gel strength.”
“WAC of chickpea flour was significantly reduced in all ultrasound-treated samples except S-10min and S-50 ◦”
Cites
Warren, F. J., Gidley, M. J., & Flanagan, B. M. (2016) · Carbohydrate Polymers · doi:10.1016/j.carbpol.2015.11.066 · Cited by 883 · see citing works
Ultrasound effect on physical properties of corn starch
Jambrak, A. ., Herceg, Z., Šubarić, D., Babić, J., Brnčić, M., Brnčić, S. R., Bosiljkov, T., Čvek, D., Tripalo, B., & Gelo, J. (2009) · Carbohydrate Polymers · doi:10.1016/j.carbpol.2009.07.051 · Cited by 397 · see citing works
Kaushal, P., Kumar, V., & SHARMA, H. K. (2012) · LWT · doi:10.1016/j.lwt.2012.02.028 · Cited by 386 · see citing works
Zhu, F. (2015) · Trends in Food Science & Technology · doi:10.1016/j.tifs.2014.12.008 · Cited by 340 · see citing works
A procedure to measure amylose in cereal starches and flours with concanavalin A
Gibson, T. S., Solah, V. A., & McCleary, B. V. (1997) · Journal of Cereal Science · doi:10.1006/jcrs.1996.0086 · Cited by 333 · see citing works
Microstructural and techno-functional properties of cassava starch modified by ultrasound
Monroy, Y., Rivero, S., & García, M. A. (2018) · Ultrasonics Sonochemistry · doi:10.1016/j.ultsonch.2017.12.048 · Cited by 264 · see citing works
Chang, L., Lan, Y., Bandillo, N., Ohm, J.-B., Chen, B., & Rao, J. (2022) · Food Hydrocolloids · doi:10.1016/j.foodhyd.2021.107165 · Cited by 259 · see citing works
Technological, processing and nutritional aspects of chickpea (Cicer arietinum) - A review
Kaur, R., & Prasad, K. (2021) · Trends in Food Science & Technology · doi:10.1016/j.tifs.2021.01.044 · Cited by 236 · see citing works
Luo, Z.-G., Fu, X., He, X., Luo, F., Gao, Q., & Yu, S. (2008) · Starch - Stärke · doi:10.1002/star.200800014 · Cited by 232 · see citing works
Preparation of physically modified oat starch with different sonication treatments
Falsafi, S. R., Maghsoudlou, Y., Rostamabadi, H., Rostamabadi, M. M., Hamedi, H., & Hosseini, S. M. H. (2019) · Food Hydrocolloids · doi:10.1016/j.foodhyd.2018.10.046 · Cited by 200 · see citing works
Wang, H., Xu, K., Ma, Y., Liang, Y., Zhang, H., & Chen, L. (2020) · Ultrasonics Sonochemistry · doi:10.1016/j.ultsonch.2019.104868 · Cited by 198 · see citing works
Morphological, physicochemical, and viscoelastic properties of sonicated corn starch
Mohammad Amini, A., Razavi, S. M. A., & Mortazavi, S. A. (2015) · Carbohydrate Polymers · doi:10.1016/j.carbpol.2015.01.020 · Cited by 168 · see citing works
Dual-frequency ultrasonic effect on the structure and properties of starch with different size
Hu, A., Li, Y., & Zheng, J. (2019) · LWT · doi:10.1016/j.lwt.2019.02.040 · Cited by 149 · see citing works
Zeleke, W. A., Collar, C., & Ronda, F. (2014) · Carbohydrate Polymers · doi:10.1016/j.carbpol.2014.08.080 · Cited by 144 · see citing works
Kaur, H., & Gill, B. S. (2019) · International Journal of Biological Macromolecules · doi:10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2018.12.149 · Cited by 143 · see citing works
Dual‐frequency ultrasound effect on structure and properties of sweet potato starch
Zheng, J., Li, Q., Hu, A., Yang, L., Lu, J., Zhang, X., & Lin, Q. (2013) · Starch - Stärke · doi:10.1002/star.201200197 · Cited by 139 · see citing works
Espinosa‐Marrón, A., Adams, K., Sinno, L., Cantu-Aldana, A., Taméz, M., Marrero, A., Bhupathiraju, S. N., & Mattei, J. (2022) · Frontiers in Sustainability · doi:10.3389/frsus.2022.841106 · Cited by 127 · see citing works
Vela, A. J., Villanueva, M., Solaesa, Á. G., & Ronda, F. (2020) · Food Hydrocolloids · doi:10.1016/j.foodhyd.2020.106480 · Cited by 123 · see citing works
Zhang, J., Liu, Y., Wang, P., Zhao, Y., Zhu, Y., & Xiao, X. (2025) · Foods · doi:10.3390/foods14050778 · Cited by 113 · see citing works
Carmona‐García, R., Bello‐Pérez, L. A., Aguirre‐Cruz, A., Aparicio‐Saguilán, A., Hernández-Torres, J., & Álvarez-Ramírez, J. G. (2016) · Starch - Stärke · doi:10.1002/star.201600019 · Cited by 109 · see citing works
Products of chickpea processing as texture improvers in gluten-free bread
Bird, L. G., Pilkington, C. L., Saputra, A., & Serventi, L. (2017) · Food Science and Technology International · doi:10.1177/1082013217717802 · Cited by 103 · see citing works
Zhao, X., Wu, T., Xing, T., Xu, X., & Zhou, G. (2018) · Food Hydrocolloids · doi:10.1016/j.foodhyd.2018.03.040 · Cited by 93 · see citing works
Modification of quinoa flour functionality using ultrasound
Zhu, F., & Li, H. (2019) · Ultrasonics Sonochemistry · doi:10.1016/j.ultsonch.2018.11.027 · Cited by 86 · see citing works
Vela, A. J., Villanueva, M., & Ronda, F. (2024) · Foods · doi:10.3390/foods13152325 · Cited by 84 · see citing works
Georgopoulos, T., Larsson, H. E., & Eliasson, A. (2003) · Food Hydrocolloids · doi:10.1016/s0268-005x(03)00059-6 · Cited by 83 · see citing works
Jamalabadi, M., Saremnezhad, S., Bahrami, A., & Jafari, S. M. (2019) · Food Science & Nutrition · doi:10.1002/fsn3.1111 · Cited by 69 · see citing works
Acquah, C., Ohemeng‐Boahen, G., Power, K. A., & Tosh, S. M. (2021) · Frontiers in Sustainable Food Systems · doi:10.3389/fsufs.2021.681662 · Cited by 66 · see citing works
Techno-Functional and Rheological Properties of Alternative Plant-Based Flours
Badia‐Olmos, C., Laguna, L., Haros, C. M., & Tárrega, A. (2023) · Foods · doi:10.3390/foods12071411 · Cited by 66 · see citing works
Garcia-Valle, D. E., Bello-Pérez, L. A., Agama-Acevedo, E., & Alvarez-Ramirez, J. (2021) · Food Chemistry · doi:10.1016/j.foodchem.2021.129993 · Cited by 56 · see citing works
Rostamabadi, H., Demirkesen, İ., Taze, B. H., Karaça, A. C., Habib, M., Jan, K., Bashir, K., Nemţanu, M. R., Colussi, R., & Falsafi, S. R. (2023) · Food Chemistry X · doi:10.1016/j.fochx.2023.100771 · Cited by 56 · see citing works
Kunyanee, K., Phadtaisong, K., Chiangmai, J. N., Parittapongsachai, N., Ngo, T. V., Luangsakul, N., & Sungsinchai, S. (2023) · Ultrasonics Sonochemistry · doi:10.1016/j.ultsonch.2023.106506 · Cited by 41 · see citing works
Pälchen, K., Bredie, W. L. P., Duijsens, D., Castillo, A. I. A., Hendrickx, M., Loey, A. M. V., Raben, A., & Grauwet, T. (2022) · Food Research International · doi:10.1016/j.foodres.2022.111245 · Cited by 35 · see citing works
Vinod, B. R., Asrey, R., Rudra, S. G., Urhe, S. B., & Mishra, S. (2023) · Food Chemistry Advances · doi:10.1016/j.focha.2023.100473 · Cited by 35 · see citing works
Effects of extrusion temperature on structure and physicochemical properties of proso millet starch
Jin, S., Xiao, C., Lu, H., & Deng, X. (2025) · International Journal of Biological Macromolecules · doi:10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2025.140011 · Cited by 35 · see citing works
Vela, A. J., Villanueva, M., Li, C., Hamaker, B., & Ronda, F. (2023) · LWT · doi:10.1016/j.lwt.2023.114463 · Cited by 30 · see citing works
Physical modification caused by acoustic cavitation improves rice flour bread-making performance
Vela, A. J., Villanueva, M., & Ronda, F. (2023) · LWT · doi:10.1016/j.lwt.2023.114950 · Cited by 30 · see citing works
Qin, W., Xi, H., Wang, A., Gong, X., Chen, Z., He, Y., Wang, L., Liu, L., Wang, L., & Tong, L. (2022) · Molecules · doi:10.3390/molecules27175403 · Cited by 27 · see citing works
Starch Interactions With Native and Added Food Components
Ledezma, C. C. Q. (2017) · Elsevier eBooks · doi:10.1016/b978-0-08-100868-3.00020-2 · Cited by 26 · see citing works
Zhou, C., Li, B., Yang, W., Liu, T., Yu, H., Liu, S., & Yang, Z. (2024) · Foods · doi:10.3390/foods13020240 · Cited by 26 · see citing works
Reduced and increased flow resistance in shear-dominated flows of Oldroyd-B fluids
Varchanis, S., Tsamopoulos, J., Shen, A. Q., & Haward, S. J. (2022) · Journal of Non-Newtonian Fluid Mechanics · doi:10.1016/j.jnnfm.2021.104698 · Cited by 25 · see citing works
Roohi, R., Abedi, E., & Mohammad Bagher Hashemi, S. (2024) · Ultrasonics Sonochemistry · doi:10.1016/j.ultsonch.2024.106785 · Cited by 24 · see citing works
Vela, A. J., Villanueva, M., Ozturk, O. K., Hamaker, B., & Ronda, F. (2023) · Current Research in Food Science · doi:10.1016/j.crfs.2023.100456 · Cited by 21 · see citing works
Starch molecular fine structure is associated with protein composition in chickpea seed
Tan, X., Tan, X., Li, E., Bai, Y., Nguyen, T. L. T., & Gilbert, R. G. (2021) · Carbohydrate Polymers · doi:10.1016/j.carbpol.2021.118489 · Cited by 17 · see citing works
Vela, A. J., Villanueva, M., Náthia-Neves, G., & Ronda, F. (2023) · Foods · doi:10.3390/foods12030484 · Cited by 17 · see citing works
Sonication-mediated modulation of macronutrient structure and digestibility in chickpea
Xiong, W., Kumar, G., Zhang, B., & Dhital, S. (2024) · Ultrasonics Sonochemistry · doi:10.1016/j.ultsonch.2024.106904 · Cited by 15 · see citing works
Gürbüz, B. N., Pastrana, L. M., Pereira, R. N., & Cerqueira, M. A. (2025) · Foods · doi:10.3390/foods14030498 · Cited by 15 · see citing works
Farrokhi, M., Ramos, I. N., & Silva, C. L. M. (2025) · Foods · doi:10.3390/foods14071094 · Cited by 15 · see citing works
Self-citation(2016) · FAO eBooks · doi:10.4060/i5528e · Cited by 14 · see citing works
Jiménez, M. J., Tárrega, A., Fuentes, R., Canet, W., & Álvarez, M. D. (2016) · Food Science and Technology International · doi:10.1177/1082013216639452 · Cited by 13 · see citing works
Noordraven, L. E. C., Kim, H.-J., Hoogland, H., Grauwet, T., & Van Loey, A. M. (2021) · Foods · doi:10.3390/foods10112622 · Cited by 12 · see citing works
Ultrasound-assisted hydration offers a novel approach to anneal in-situ pinto bean starch
Kumar, G., Hooper, J. F., Li, E., Devkota, L., & Dhital, S. (2025) · Carbohydrate Polymers · doi:10.1016/j.carbpol.2025.123602 · Cited by 11 · see citing works
Miryan, M., Azizi, A., Pasdar, Y., & Moradi, M. (2025) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-025-02613-8 · Cited by 11 · see citing works
Processing to improve the sustainability of chickpea as a functional food ingredient
Augustin, M. A., Chen, J., & Ye, J. (2024) · Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture · doi:10.1002/jsfa.13532 · Cited by 10 · see citing works
Farrokhi, M., Ramos, I. N., & Silva, C. L. M. (2025) · Trends in Food Science & Technology · doi:10.1016/j.tifs.2025.105349 · Cited by 6 · see citing works
Self-citationViadel, A., Laguna, L., & Tárrega, A. (2024) · Journal of Texture Studies · doi:10.1111/jtxs.12858 · Cited by 5 · see citing works
Wang, K., Zhang, B., & Dhital, S. (2022) · CRC Press eBooks · doi:10.1201/9781003088929-3 · Cited by 2 · see citing works
Barbero (2014) · doi:10.1016/j · Cited by 1 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 1
- Sosulski, 1962, The centrifuge method for determining flour absorption in hard red spring wheats, Cereal Chemistry, 39, 344
Cited by
Still being checked.
- Authors
- Farrokhi, M., Brandão, T. R. S., Gonçalves, E. M., & Silva, C. L. M.
- Affiliations
- Universidade Católica Portuguesa (PT)
- Instituto Nacional de Investigação Agrária e Veterinária (PT)
- Corresponding author
- Silva, Cristina L.M.
- Venue
- Food Hydrocolloids
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2027-01
- Volume
- 182
- Pages
- 113096
- ISSN
- 0268-005X (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W7167075827
- Semantic Scholar
- 2d65639e127f9295d46354491ccbe1c1af9c5f8d
- Cited by
- 0
- References
- 55
- FWCI
- 0.00
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Licence
- Locations
- Food Hydrocolloids (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- Fundacao para a Ciencia e a Tecnologia
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Nursing › Nutrition and Dietetics › Food composition and properties
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Food Science › Proteins in Food Systems
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Food Science › Polysaccharides Composition and Applications
- Keywords
- chickpea flour, sonication, high-intensity ultrasound, starch gelatinization, starch crystallinity, starch solubility, viscoelasticity, gel strength, particle aggregation, damaged starch, non-thermal processing, structure-function relationship
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Claims read by deepseek-v4.1-flash under definition version 3 (extract-v3) on 2026-11-06.
Classified by jev-1.13-20260917 (gold-guideline-v0.2) on 2026-11-06.
Cited sources are checked by gpt-6-sol.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review