The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Optimal CO2 Abatement in the Presence of Induced Technological Change
Open accessAbstract
This paper explores the significance of policy-induced technological change for the design of carbon-abatement policies. We derive analytical expressions characterizing optimal CO2 abatement and carbon tax profiles under different specifications for the channels through which technological progress occurs. We consider both R&D-based and learning-by-doing-based knowledge accumulation, and we examine each specification under both a cost-effectiveness and a benefit–cost policy criterion. We show analytically in a cost-effectiveness setting that the presence of induced technological change (ITC) always implies a lower time profile of optimal carbon taxes. The same is true in a benefit–cost setting as long as damages are convex in the atmospheric CO2 concentration. The impact of ITC on the optimal abatement path varies. When knowledge is gained through R&D investments, the presence of ITC justifies shifting some abatement from the present to the future. However, when knowledge is accumulated via learning-by-doing the impact on the timing of abatement is analytically ambiguous. Illustrative numerical simulations indicate that the impact of ITC upon overall costs and optimal carbon taxes can be quite large in a cost-effectiveness setting but typically is much smaller under a benefit–cost policy criterion. The impact of ITC on the timing of abatement is very slight, but the effect (applicable in the benefit–cost case) on cumulative abatement over time can be large, especially when knowledge is generated through learning-by doing.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Endogenous Technological Change
Romer, P. M. (1990) · Journal of Political Economy · doi:10.1086/261725 · Cited by 17,711
Toward a New Conception of the Environment-Competitiveness Relationship
Porter, M. E., & Linde, C. V. D. (1995) · Journal of Economic Perspectives · doi:10.1257/jep.9.4.97 · Cited by 13,365
Cited by
Environmental and technology policies for climate mitigation
Fischer, C., & Newell, R. G. (2008) · Journal of Environmental Economics and Management · doi:10.1016/j.jeem.2007.11.001 · Cited by 1,157
Environmental Policy and Technological Change
Jaffe, A. B., Newell, R. G., & Stavins, R. N. (2002) · Environmental and Resource Economics · doi:10.1023/a:1015519401088 · Cited by 1,050
Instrument choice for environmental protection when technological innovation is endogenous
Fischer, C., Parry, I. W. H., & Pizer, W. A. (2003) · Journal of Environmental Economics and Management · doi:10.1016/s0095-0696(03)00002-0 · Cited by 442
The impact of energy conservation on technology and economic growth
Smulders, S., & de Nooij, M. (2003) · Resource and Energy Economics · doi:10.1016/s0928-7655(02)00017-9 · Cited by 357
Mitigation from a cross sectoral perspective
Change, I. P. O. C. (2012) · Climate Change 2007 · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511546013.015 · Cited by 184
Metadata
- Authors
- Goulder, L. H., & Mathai, K.
- Venue
- Journal of Environmental Economics and Management
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2000-01
- Volume
- 39
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 1-38
- ISSN
- 0095-0696 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2890188665
- Cited by
- 644
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 61.97
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Optimal CO2 Abatement in the Presence of Induced Technological Change. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1006/jeem.1999.1089
- The paper
- Goulder, L. H., & Mathai, K. (2000). Optimal CO2 Abatement in the Presence of Induced Technological Change. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management. https://doi.org/10.1006/jeem.1999.1089
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.