Irrepressible Stereotypes
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Anti-bias training is based in the intuition that knowledge about members of other groups, and an understanding of stereotyping, may reduce discrimination.
“Anti-bias training is based in the intuition that knowledge about members of other groups, and an understanding of stereotyping, may reduce discrimination (Fiske, 1998;Nelson et al., 1996).”
From Are Diversity Programs Merely Ceremonial? Evidence-Free Institutionalization (2017) · cites this paper as Nelson et al., 1996
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Kalev, A., Dobbin, F., & Kelly, E. (2006) · American Sociological Review · doi:10.1177/000312240607100404 · Cited by 2,052 · see citing works
Are Diversity Programs Merely Ceremonial? Evidence-Free Institutionalization
Dobbin, F., & Kalev, A. (2017) · The SAGE Handbook of Organizational Institutionalism · doi:10.4135/9781446280669.n32 · Cited by 56 · see citing works
- Authors
- Nelson, T. E., Acker, M., & Manis, M.
- Affiliations
- The Ohio State University (US)
- University of Michigan (US)
- ORCID
- Nelson, Thomas E.
- Venue
- Journal of Experimental Social Psychology
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 1996-01
- Volume
- 32
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 13-38
- ISSN
- 0022-1031 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W4233473664
- Cited by
- 59
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2025: 1 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 2 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 1
- FWCI
- 9.83
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of Experimental Social Psychology (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Social and Intergroup Psychology
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment
- Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › General Decision Sciences › Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics
- Keywords
- stereotypes, individuating information, social judgment, gender stereotypes, career aspirations, prejudice
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
