Responses to Other-Imposed Pro-Black Pressure: Acceptance or Backlash?
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Whites resist external controls on racial prejudice.
“Studies of bias control confirm the general principle: whites resist external controls on racial prejudice (Galinsky and Moskowitz, 2000;Plant and Devine, 2001).”
From Are Diversity Programs Merely Ceremonial? Evidence-Free Institutionalization (2017) · cites this paper as Plant and Devine, 2001
Anticipated public censure can have paradoxical effects.
“Anticipated public censure can have paradoxical effects.57,58”
From Reducing Racial Bias Among Health Care Providers: Lessons from Social-Cognitive Psychology (2007) · cites this paper as [58]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 32 · Cited by 156
- Authors
- Plant, E. A., & Devine, P. G.
- Affiliations
- Florida State University (US)
- University of Wisconsin–Madison (US)
- Corresponding author
- Plant, E.Ashby
- Venue
- Journal of Experimental Social Psychology
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2001-11
- Volume
- 37
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 486-501
- ISSN
- 0022-1031 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2069704519
- Cited by
- 156
- References
- 32
- Citations by year
- 2026: 4 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 11 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 11 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 8 · 2014: 7 · 2013: 9 · 2012: 4
- FWCI
- 24.80
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of Experimental Social Psychology (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Social and Intergroup Psychology
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Psychology of Social Influence
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Racial and Ethnic Identity Research
- Keywords
- political correctness, backlash, intrinsic and extrinsic motivation, prejudice, emotional responses, attitude change, compliance
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
