Cited by 84Place Attachment and Urban StudiesCultural Differences and ValuesInternational Student and Expatriate Challenges

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

RELOCATION AND PRIVACY REGULATION: A CROSS-CULTURAL ANALYSIS

HARRIS, PAUL B., WERNER, CAROL M., BROWN, BARBARA B., INGEBRITSEN, DAVE·1995·Journal of Environmental Psychology

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1006/jevp.1995.0027

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
HARRIS, P. B., WERNER, C. M., BROWN, B. B., & INGEBRITSEN, D.
Affiliations
University of Utah (US)
Venue
Journal of Environmental Psychology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
1995-12
Volume
15
Issue
4
Pages
311-320
ISSN
0272-4944 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2075220601
Cited by
84
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 2
FWCI
1.71
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Journal of Environmental Psychology (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Place Attachment and Urban Studies
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Cultural Differences and Values
  • Social Sciences › Communication › International Student and Expatriate Challenges
Keywords
privacy regulation, relocation, cross-cultural comparison, place attachment, sense of well-being, neighbor interaction, Asian students, American students, family interaction

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review