The DOI matches its Crossref record.
RELOCATION AND PRIVACY REGULATION: A CROSS-CULTURAL ANALYSIS
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Strong place attachment bonds are positively associated with improved quality of life.
“Research has shown that strong place attachment bonds are positively associated with improved quality of life (Harris et al., 1995).”
From Perceived restorativeness and environment quality in relation to well-being, residential satisfaction, and sense of community: an analysis in Northeast Italy (2025) · cites this paper as Harris et al., 1995
Citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Miola, L., & Pazzaglia, F. (2025) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2025.1522098 · Cited by 14
“Research has shown that strong place attachment bonds are positively associated with improved quality of life (Harris et al., 1995).”
Metadata
- Authors
- HARRIS, P. B., WERNER, C. M., BROWN, B. B., & INGEBRITSEN, D.
- Affiliations
- University of Utah (US)
- Venue
- Journal of Environmental Psychology
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 1995-12
- Volume
- 15
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 311-320
- ISSN
- 0272-4944 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2075220601
- Cited by
- 84
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 5 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 2
- FWCI
- 1.71
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of Environmental Psychology (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Place Attachment and Urban Studies
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Cultural Differences and Values
- Social Sciences › Communication › International Student and Expatriate Challenges
- Keywords
- privacy regulation, relocation, cross-cultural comparison, place attachment, sense of well-being, neighbor interaction, Asian students, American students, family interaction
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review