The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Comparing Methods for Introducing Blind and Visually Impaired People to Unfamiliar Urban Environments
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“showing that access to tactile maps led to improved cognitive map development in terms of accuracy and flexibility.”
From Cognitive Mapping Without Vision: Comparing Wayfinding Performance After Learning From Digital Touchscreen-Based Multimodal Maps vs. Embossed Tactile Overlays (2020) · cites this paper as Espinosa et al. (1998)
In the citing paper
“Espinosa et al. (1998) found that over multiple trials and with delays between training and test, tactile map learners were much better on measures of both route and survey knowledge than participants who learned only from direct environmental experience”
From Cognitive Mapping Without Vision: Comparing Wayfinding Performance After Learning From Digital Touchscreen-Based Multimodal Maps vs. Embossed Tactile Overlays (2020) · cites this paper as Espinosa et al. (1998)
In the citing paper
“The literature has unequivocally shown that access to tactile maps greatly benefits the accuracy of environmental learning, cognitive map development, and wayfinding performance by both children and adult BVI users (Golledge, 1991; Espinosa et al., 1998; Blades et al., 1999).”
From Cognitive Mapping Without Vision: Comparing Wayfinding Performance After Learning From Digital Touchscreen-Based Multimodal Maps vs. Embossed Tactile Overlays (2020) · cites this paper as Espinosa et al., 1998
Citations
Cites
Still being checked.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Imagery and spatial processes in blindness and visual impairment
Cattaneo, Z., Vecchi, T., Cornoldi, C., Mammarella, I. C., Bonino, D., Ricciardi, E., & Pietrini, P. (2008) · Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.neubiorev.2008.05.002 · Cited by 322
A wearable system for mobility improvement of visually impaired people
Cardin, S., Thalmann, D., & Vexo, F. (2006) · The Visual Computer · doi:10.1007/s00371-006-0032-4 · Cited by 169
Cognitive load of navigating without vision when guided by virtual sound versus spatial language.
Klatzky, R. L., Marston, J. R., Giudice, N. A., Golledge, R. G., & Loomis, J. M. (2006) · Journal of Experimental Psychology Applied · doi:10.1037/1076-898x.12.4.223 · Cited by 145
Cognitive mapping without visual experience
Ungar, S. (2018) · Routledge eBooks · doi:10.4324/9781315812281-13 · Cited by 138
Self-citationNoordzij, M. L., Zuidhoek, S., & Postma, A. (2005) · Cognition · doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2005.05.006 · Cited by 127
Metadata
- Authors
- Espinosa, M. A., Ungar, S., Ochaı́ta, E., Blades, M., & Spencer, C.
- Affiliations
- University of Sheffield (GB)
- Venue
- Journal of Environmental Psychology
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 1998-09
- Volume
- 18
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 277-287
- ISSN
- 0272-4944 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2169119783
- Cited by
- 168
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 12 · 2023: 11 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 12 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 9 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 11 · 2015: 8 · 2014: 9 · 2013: 7 · 2012: 10
- FWCI
- 2.17
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of Environmental Psychology (publishedVersion)
- CogPrints (University of Southampton) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Spatial Cognition and Navigation
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Tactile and Sensory Interactions
- Social Sciences › Transportation › Urban Transport and Accessibility
- Keywords
- blind people, visually impaired people, tactile maps, spatial learning, route learning, urban environment, spatial knowledge, verbal description, direct experience, wayfinding
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
