The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Elucidating the Folding Problem of Helical Peptides using Empirical Parameters. II†. Helix Macrodipole Effects and Rational Modification of the Helical Content of Natural Peptides
Abstract
Explaining the helical behaviour of amino acid sequences in solution could be one of the first steps in solving the protein folding problem in a rational way. The information about the conformational behaviour of helical peptides in solution, as well as the alpha-helix stability in proteins, has been utilised to derive a database with the energy contributions for various interaction taking place in an alpha-helix: intrinsic helical propensities, side-chain to side-chain interactions, main-chain to main-chain hydrogen bonds, and capping effects. This database was implemented in a algorithm based on the helix-coil transition theory (AGADIR). Here, the effects on helix stability due to interactions between charged groups and the helix macrodipole are described, quantified and implemented in AGADIR. The algorithm correctly calculates the average helical behaviour in solution of 423 peptides analysed by circular dichroism and it describes the helicity at a residue level, as found when comparing the prediction for each amino acid residue with the data derived from nuclear magnetic resonance studies. Using AGADIR we have done a rational modification of peptides corresponding to protein secondary structure elements in order to increase their helical content. The circular dichroism analysis of the mutant peptides showed a very good agreement between the experimental and calculated helical content. Moreover, in certain specific cases in which strong tertiary contacts in folded proteins do not exist, the algorithm successfully predicts the length of mutagenised alpha-helices. It is interesting to note that the final values of the parameters used do not significantly differ in absolute terms from those extracted from mutagenesis studies in proteins. This indicates that the same physico-chemical principles stand for both systems.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“indeed, calculations of the percentage of helicity of the CC-Hex*-L24E monomer with Agadir114−118 show 13% helicity at pH 2 and 9% helicity at pH 8.5, with intermediate helicities in the pH range 2–8.5.”
From Assessment of the Topology and Oligomerisation States of Coiled Coils Using Metadynamics with Conformational Restraints (2025) · cites this paper as [115]
Citations
Cites
The publisher hasn’t deposited this paper’s reference list.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Best, R. B., Zhu, X., Shim, J., Lopes, P. E. M., Mittal, J., Feig, M., & MacKerell, A. D. (2012) · Journal of Chemical Theory and Computation · doi:10.1021/ct300400x · Cited by 4,541
Integrated Modeling Program, Applied Chemical Theory (IMPACT)
Banks, J. L., Beard, H. S., Cao, Y., Cho, A. E., Damm, W., Farid, R., Felts, A. K., Halgren, T. A., Mainz, D. T., Maple, J. R., et al. (2005) · Journal of Computational Chemistry · doi:10.1002/jcc.20292 · Cited by 1,504
A Helix Propensity Scale Based on Experimental Studies of Peptides and Proteins
Pace, C. N., & Scholtz, J. M. (1998) · Biophysical Journal · doi:10.1016/s0006-3495(98)77529-0 · Cited by 1,074
“The measured helicities of 423 peptides were used by Muñoz and Serrano (1995) to derive parameters characterizing the helix-to-coil transition of peptides in solution.”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialDe Novo Design and Structural Characterization of Proteins and Metalloproteins
DeGrado, W. F., Summa, C. M., Pavone, V., Nastri, F., & Lombardi, A. (1999) · Annual Review of Biochemistry · doi:10.1146/annurev.biochem.68.1.779 · Cited by 572
Protein Design: A Hierarchic Approach
Bryson, J. W., Betz, S. F., Lu, H. S. M., Suich, D. J., Zhou, H. X., O’Neil, K. T., & DeGrado, W. F. (1995) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.270.5238.935 · Cited by 530
Metadata
- Authors
- Muñoz, V., & Serrano, L.
- Affiliations
- European Molecular Biology Laboratory (DE)
- Venue
- Journal of Molecular Biology
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 1995-01
- Volume
- 245
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 275-296
- ISSN
- 0022-2836 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2039104547
- Cited by
- 354
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 5 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 11 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 11 · 2013: 8 · 2012: 12
- FWCI
- 7.32
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of Molecular Biology (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Protein Structure and Dynamics
- Physical Sciences › Chemistry › Organic Chemistry › Chemical Synthesis and Analysis
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › RNA and protein synthesis mechanisms
- Keywords
- helical peptides, protein folding, alpha-helix stability, helical propensity, side-chain interactions, hydrogen bonding, peptide modification, circular dichroism
- MeSH terms
- Methyl-Accepting Chemotaxis Proteins, Algorithms, Amino Acid Sequence, Bacterial Proteins, Circular Dichroism, Membrane Proteins, Models, Chemical, Molecular Sequence Data, Peptides, Recombinant Proteins, Spectrin, Protein Structure, Secondary, Protein Folding
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review