Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 536

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Determination of atomic desolvation energies from the structures of crystallized proteins

Open access
Zhang, Chao, Vasmatzis, George, Cornette, James L, DeLisi, Charles·1997·Journal of Molecular Biology

Abstract

We estimated effective atomic contact energies (ACE), the desolvation free energies required to transfer atoms from water to a protein's interior, using an adaptation of a method introduced by S. Miyazawa and R. L. Jernigan. The energies were obtained for 18 different atom types, which were resolved on the basis of the way their properties cluster in the 20 common amino acids. In addition to providing information on atoms at the highest resolution compatible with the amount and quality of data currently available, the method itself has several new features, including its reference state, the random crystal structure, which removes compositional bias, and a scaling factor that makes contact energies quantitatively comparable with experimentally measured energies. The high level of resolution, the explicit accounting of the local properties of protein interiors during determination of the energies, and the very high computational efficiency with which they can be assigned during any computation, should make the results presented here widely applicable. First we used ACE to calculate the free energies of transferring side-chains from protein interior into water. A comparison of the results thus obtained with the measured free energies of transferring side-chains from n-octanol to water, indicates that the magnitude of protein to water transfer free energies for hydrophobic side-chains is larger than that of n-octanol to water transfer free energies. The difference is consistent with observations made by D. Shortle and co-workers, who measured differential free energies of protein unfolding for site-specific mutants in which Ala or Gly was substituted for various hydrophobic side-chains. A direct comparison (calculated versus observed free energy differences) with those experiments finds slopes of 1.15 and 1.13 for Gly and Ala substitutions, respectively. Finally we compared calculated and observed binding free energies of nine protease-inhibitor complexes. This requires a full free energy function, which is created by adding direct electrostatic interactions and an appropriate entropic component to the solvation free energy term. The calculated free energies are typically within 10% of the observed values. Taken collectively, these results suggest that ACE should provide a reasonably accurate and rapidly evaluatable solvation component of free energy, and should thus make accessible a range of docking, design and protein folding calculations that would otherwise be difficult to perform.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1006/jmbi.1996.0859

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 1 references

Cited by

See all 536

Metadata

Authors
Zhang, C., Vasmatzis, G., Cornette, J. L., & DeLisi, C.
Venue
Journal of Molecular Biology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
1997-04
Volume
267
Issue
3
Pages
707-726
ISSN
0022-2836 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W174644880
Cited by
536
References
1
FWCI
2.59
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
hybrid

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Determination of atomic desolvation energies from the structures of crystallized proteins. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1006/jmbi.1996.0859
The paper
Zhang, C., Vasmatzis, G., Cornette, J. L., & DeLisi, C. (1997). Determination of atomic desolvation energies from the structures of crystallized proteins. Journal of Molecular Biology. https://doi.org/10.1006/jmbi.1996.0859

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.