Cited by 1,221Protein Structure and DynamicsEnzyme Structure and FunctionMachine Learning in Bioinformatics

A new approach to protein fold recognition

Jones, D. T., Taylort, W. R., Thornton, J. M.·1992·Nature

Abstract

The prediction of protein tertiary structure from sequence using molecular energy calculations has not yet been successful; an alternative strategy of recognizing known motifs or folds in sequences looks more promising. We present here a new approach to fold recognition, whereby sequences are fitted directly onto the backbone coordinates of known protein structures. Our method for protein fold recognition involves automatic modelling of protein structures using a given sequence, and is based on the frameworks of known protein folds. The plausibility of each model, and hence the degree of compatibility between the sequence and the proposed structure, is evaluated by means of a set of empirical potentials derived from proteins of known structure. The novel aspect of our approach is that the matching of sequences to backbone coordinates is performed in full three-dimensional space, incorporating specific pair interactions explicitly.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/358086a0

Cites

20 of 20 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The principle that tertiary structure models aid structural template retrieval has long been understood and is the basis of protein threading.

    “Of course, this principle has been well understood for some time, and is the basis of protein threading (45,46), but the ease and speed with which a rough candidate model can be generated for a query sequence has the potential to accelerate and improve the sensitivity of structural template searches.”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Jones, D. T., Taylort, W. R., & Thornton, J. M.
Affiliations
  • University College London (GB)
  • National Institute for Medical Research (GB)
Venue
Nature
Published
1992-07
Volume
358
Issue
6381
Pages
86-89
ISSN
  • 0028-0836 (ISSN-L)
  • 1476-4687
OpenAlex
W2033496784
Cited by
1,221
References
20
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 15 · 2021: 29 · 2020: 21 · 2019: 21 · 2018: 16 · 2017: 20 · 2016: 22 · 2015: 15 · 2014: 23 · 2013: 31 · 2012: 26
FWCI
17.96
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Nature (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • UCL Discovery (University College London) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Protein Structure and Dynamics
  • Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Materials Chemistry › Enzyme Structure and Function
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Machine Learning in Bioinformatics
Keywords
protein fold recognition, protein structure prediction, sequence-structure alignment, empirical potentials, pairwise interactions, homology modeling
MeSH terms
Algorithms, Amino Acid Sequence, Models, Theoretical, Molecular Sequence Data, Myoglobin, Phycocyanin, Protein Conformation, Proteins, Structure-Activity Relationship, Thermodynamics, Sequence Alignment

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review