Cited by 96Cardiac Ischemia and ReperfusionCardiac Imaging and DiagnosticsAcute Myocardial Infarction Research

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Patterns of Mobilization of Copper and Iron Following Myocardial Ischemia: Possible Predictive Criteria for Tissue Injury

Berenshtein, Eduard, Mayer, Bernd, Goldberg, Chaya, Kitrossky, Nahum, Chevion, Mordechai·1997·Journal of Molecular and Cellular Cardiology

Abstract

Direct evidence for substantial iron and copper mobilization into the coronary flow immediately following prolonged, but not short, cardiac ischemia is presented. When small volumes of coronary flow fractions (CFFs) were serially collected upon reperfusion, after 25-60 min of ischemia, the copper and iron levels in the first CFF were 50-fold and 12- to 15-fold higher, respectively, than corresponding pre-ischemic values. The copper and iron levels after shorter periods (15-21 min) of ischemia were only about five-fold higher than the pre-ischemic values. This demonstrates that the resumption of coronary flow is accompanied by a burst of both metal ions. The levels of Cu/Fe in the CFFs correlated well with the loss of cardiac function following global ischemia of varying duration. After 18 min of ischemia, the residual cardiac function was less than 50%, and the damage was essentially reversible. After 25 min of ischemia, it exceeded 50% and was only partially reversible, while after 35 min, the damage exceeded 80%, and was mostly irreversible. The results are in accord with the hypothesis that copper and iron play causative roles in myocardial injury through mediation of hydroxyl radical production. Thus, the pattern of Cu/Fe mobilization from the tissue into the CFF can be used for the prediction of the severity of myocardial damage following ischemia, and could be developed into useful modalities for intervention in tissue injury.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1006/jmcc.1997.0535

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Metadata

Authors
Berenshtein, E., Mayer, B., Goldberg, C., Kitrossky, N., & Chevion, M.
Affiliations
  • Hebrew University of Jerusalem (IL)
  • University of Graz (AT)
Corresponding author
Chevion, Mordechai
Venue
Journal of Molecular and Cellular Cardiology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
1997-11
Volume
29
Issue
11
Pages
3025-3034
ISSN
0022-2828 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2052262965
Cited by
96
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 6 · 2012: 5
FWCI
1.22
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Molecular and Cellular Cardiology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Hebrew University of Jerusalem
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Cardiac Ischemia and Reperfusion
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging › Cardiac Imaging and Diagnostics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Acute Myocardial Infarction Research
Keywords
copper mobilization, iron mobilization, myocardial ischemia, reperfusion, myocardial injury, hydroxyl radicals, oxidative stress, ischemic time
MeSH terms
Animals, Copper, Coronary Circulation, Free Radicals, Hemodynamics, Iron, Male, Oxidation-Reduction, Predictive Value of Tests, Myocardial Reperfusion Injury, Myocardial Ischemia, Rats, Sprague-Dawley, Rats

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review