The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Patterns of Mobilization of Copper and Iron Following Myocardial Ischemia: Possible Predictive Criteria for Tissue Injury
Abstract
Direct evidence for substantial iron and copper mobilization into the coronary flow immediately following prolonged, but not short, cardiac ischemia is presented. When small volumes of coronary flow fractions (CFFs) were serially collected upon reperfusion, after 25-60 min of ischemia, the copper and iron levels in the first CFF were 50-fold and 12- to 15-fold higher, respectively, than corresponding pre-ischemic values. The copper and iron levels after shorter periods (15-21 min) of ischemia were only about five-fold higher than the pre-ischemic values. This demonstrates that the resumption of coronary flow is accompanied by a burst of both metal ions. The levels of Cu/Fe in the CFFs correlated well with the loss of cardiac function following global ischemia of varying duration. After 18 min of ischemia, the residual cardiac function was less than 50%, and the damage was essentially reversible. After 25 min of ischemia, it exceeded 50% and was only partially reversible, while after 35 min, the damage exceeded 80%, and was mostly irreversible. The results are in accord with the hypothesis that copper and iron play causative roles in myocardial injury through mediation of hydroxyl radical production. Thus, the pattern of Cu/Fe mobilization from the tissue into the CFF can be used for the prediction of the severity of myocardial damage following ischemia, and could be developed into useful modalities for intervention in tissue injury.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The iron-mediated causal chain of ischaemia → (su)peroxide → OH• radical formation occurs during the development of heart disease, especially during reperfusion injury.
“There is no doubt that the iron-mediated causal chain of ischaemia → (su)peroxide → OH• radical formation occurs during the development of heart disease, especially during reperfusion injury [710-713]”
Citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Kell, D. B. (2009) · BMC Medical Genomics · doi:10.1186/1755-8794-2-2 · Cited by 554
Metadata
- Authors
- Berenshtein, E., Mayer, B., Goldberg, C., Kitrossky, N., & Chevion, M.
- Affiliations
- Hebrew University of Jerusalem (IL)
- University of Graz (AT)
- Corresponding author
- Chevion, Mordechai
- Venue
- Journal of Molecular and Cellular Cardiology
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 1997-11
- Volume
- 29
- Issue
- 11
- Pages
- 3025-3034
- ISSN
- 0022-2828 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2052262965
- Cited by
- 96
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 6 · 2012: 5
- FWCI
- 1.22
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of Molecular and Cellular Cardiology (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- Hebrew University of Jerusalem
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Cardiac Ischemia and Reperfusion
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging › Cardiac Imaging and Diagnostics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Acute Myocardial Infarction Research
- Keywords
- copper mobilization, iron mobilization, myocardial ischemia, reperfusion, myocardial injury, hydroxyl radicals, oxidative stress, ischemic time
- MeSH terms
- Animals, Copper, Coronary Circulation, Free Radicals, Hemodynamics, Iron, Male, Oxidation-Reduction, Predictive Value of Tests, Myocardial Reperfusion Injury, Myocardial Ischemia, Rats, Sprague-Dawley, Rats
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review