The DOI matches its Crossref record; 35 of the 36 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Splitting the Differences: A Structural Alignment View of Similarity
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Citations
Cites
Tversky, A. (1977) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/0033-295x.84.4.327 · Cited by 7,414
Family resemblances: Studies in the internal structure of categories
Rosch, E., & Mervis, C. B. (1975) · Cognitive Psychology · doi:10.1016/0010-0285(75)90024-9 · Cited by 5,933
Toward an instance theory of automatization.
Logan, G. D. (1988) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/0033-295x.95.4.492 · Cited by 3,466
Elimination by aspects: A theory of choice
Tversky, A. (1972) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/h0032955 · Cited by 3,365
Norm theory: Comparing reality to its alternatives.
Kahneman, D. J., & Miller, D. T. (1986) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/0033-295x.93.2.136 · Cited by 3,253
Context theory of classification learning
Medin, D. L., & Schaffer, M. M. (1978) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/0033-295x.85.3.207 · Cited by 3,061
Smith, E. E., & Medin, D. L. (1981) · Harvard University Press eBooks · doi:10.4159/harvard.9780674866270 · Cited by 2,653
Attention, similarity, and the identification-categorization relationship.
Nosofsky, R. M. (1986) · Journal of Experimental Psychology General · doi:10.1037//0096-3445.115.1.39 · Cited by 2,207
Contingent weighting in judgment and choice.
Tversky, A., Sattath, S., & Slovic, P. (1988) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/0033-295x.95.3.371 · Cited by 1,624
The structure-mapping engine: Algorithm and examples
Falkenhainer, B., Forbus, K. D., & Gentner, D. (1989) · Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.1016/0004-3702(89)90077-5 · Cited by 1,454
Self-citation
Flagged first, then by citations
1 of the 36 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 301–339 of 339
When Comparison Becomes Contrast: Choice in an Oppositional Framework
Krishen, A. S. (2007) · VTechWorks (Virginia Tech)
Clarifying the Role of Alignability in Similarity Comparisons
Jameson, J., Dedre Gentner, C., Day, S. B., Christie, S., Colhoun, J., & Bartels, D. M. (2005) · eScholarship (California Digital Library)
Testing the weighted salience model of conceptual combination
Patterson, M. J. (2004) · OakTrust (Texas A&M University Libraries)
Burghardt, J. (2014) · heiDOK (Heidelberg University) · doi:10.11588/heidok.00017544
문희강, 이윤정, 이민선, & Lee, Y.-Y. (2012) · Journal of Korea Design Forum · doi:10.21326/ksdt.2012..34.039
Addressing Information Proliferation: Applications of Information Extraction and Text Mining.
Li, J. (2013) · CU Scholar (University of Colorado Boulder)
Learning and representation of relational categories
Jung, W. (2013) · Illinois Digital Environment for Access to Learning and Scholarship (University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign)
Exploring Contextual Influences on Word Meaning via Multiple-Level Similarity Judgments
Gaylord, N. (2011) · eScholarship (California Digital Library)
Transformative Character Arcs For Use in Compelling Stories.
Veale, T. (2014) · ICCC
Expectation vs. Reality in the Field of Entrepreneurship
Poblete, C. (2016) · Open Access at Essex (University of Essex)
Age-related changes in functional hemispheric asymmetry : an fMRI study.
Heng, G. J. (2013) · DR-NTU (Nanyang Technological University)
Fischer, P. M. (2011) · Alexandria (UniSG) (University of St.Gallen)
Selective Attention by Structural Alignment: An Eyetracking Study
Hoffman, A. B., Love, B. C., & Markman, A. B. (2010) · eScholarship (California Digital Library)
Self-citationSystematicity as a Processing Constraint on Feature Centrality
Dedre Gentner, C., & Jameson, J. (2006) · eScholarship (California Digital Library)
A Dual Model of Relational Concept Representation
Corral, D. (2017) · CU Scholar (University of Colorado Boulder)
Some Attention Learning “Biases” in Adaptive Network Models of Categorization
Matsuka, T., Corter, J. E., & Markman, A. B. (2010) · eScholarship (California Digital Library)
Self-citationPaliakova, K., & Hristova, P. (2018) · eScholarship (California Digital Library)
The effect of comparison on the perceived similarity of complex visual stimuli
Engelbrecht, P. C. (2018) · Goldsmiths (University of London) · doi:10.25602/gold.00026095
정성희, & 이경선 (2011) · Journal of Product Research · doi:10.36345/kacst.2011.29.3.011
From job title to job speed date : exploring new perspectives on recruitment
Wille, L. (2020) · Ghent University Academic Bibliography (Ghent University)
Revising Conceptual Similarity by Neural Networks
Pavone, A., & Plebe, A. (2021) · International Joint Conference on Computational Intelligence · doi:10.5220/0010678300003063
Structural Alignment Facilitates Discovering Differences
Dedre Gentner, C., & Gunn, V. (2022) · Routledge eBooks · doi:10.4324/9781315782416-239
The effect of spokes-character copycatting on consumers' brand evaluations
Sugimoto, T. (2023) · Queensland University of Technology · doi:10.5204/thesis.eprints.245032
Lázzari, E. J. T., & Zani, A. (2024) · Revista de Gestão e Secretariado (Management and Administrative Professional Review) · doi:10.7769/gesec.v15i4.3697
Lázzari, E. J. T., & Netto, A. Z. (2024) · Seven Editora eBooks · doi:10.56238/sevened2024.010-010
Design teaching and learning from the perspective of concept alignment
Ren, L., Huang, R., & Deng, Z. (2025) · International Journal of Technology and Design Education · doi:10.1007/s10798-025-09994-x
Cognitive Science Society 2023, Holyoak, K. J., Ichien, N., Lin, N., & Lu, H. (2023) · eScholarship (California Digital Library) · doi:10.48448/dfnn-9d33
Ichien, N. (2023) · eScholarship (California Digital Library)
Lalla, A. (2025) · eScholarship@McGill (McGill) · doi:10.82308/31743
Multiculturals in organizations : Their roles for organizational effectiveness
Hong, H. (2012) · theses.fr (ABES) · doi:10.70675/9e5cbb9czc7cdz47bdza576zf0a9ca5c3896
Concepts : Learning and Generalization : a developmental approach
Stansbury, E. (2023) · theses.fr (ABES) · doi:10.70675/db00ce2dz8d30z459dza708z6cc1dc38be71
Comparisons promote a tradeoff between generalization and individuation
Cognitive Science Society 2025, Ichien, N., & Kan, A. (2025) · eScholarship (California Digital Library) · doi:10.48448/z5sj-tz16
Shi, K., & Li, J. (2026) · Creativity Research Journal · doi:10.1080/10400419.2026.2737193
MACIFAC: A Model of Si~ i~ ari~-~ s~ Retrieval
Forsus, K. D., Dedre Gentner, C., & Keith, L. A. W. (1994)
Metadata
- Authors
- Markman, A. B., & Gentner, D.
- Affiliations
- Northwestern University (US)
- ORCID
- Gentner, D.
- Venue
- Journal of Memory and Language
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 1993-08
- Volume
- 32
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 517-535
- ISSN
- 0749-596X (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2079783775
- Semantic Scholar
- 71396e813fcb793a16f284fd0d0b7866dd071bb4
- Cited by
- 334
- References
- 36
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 12 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 10 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 9 · 2016: 8 · 2015: 9 · 2014: 11 · 2013: 19 · 2012: 16
- FWCI
- 9.64
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of Memory and Language (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Categorization, perception, and language
- Social Sciences › Linguistics and Language › Language, Metaphor, and Cognition
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Social and Intergroup Psychology
- Keywords
- similarity judgments, structural alignment, conceptual structure, word pair similarity
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review