Cited by 278Neurobiology of Language and BilingualismSyntax, Semantics, Linguistic VariationReading and Literacy Development

The Role of Lexical Frequency in Syntactic Ambiguity Resolution

Open access
Trueswell, John C.·1996·Journal of Memory and Language

Abstract

The role of lexical frequency in syntactic ambiguity resolution was explored in two self-paced reading studies of ambiguous reduced relative clauses. Recent constraint-based models of syntactic ambiguity resolution have proposed that for a reduced relative clause (e.g., “The room searched by the police was . . .”), both the participle and past tense forms of the ambiguous verb (“searched”) are made available in parallel and that local syntactic and semantic information are used to resolve the ambiguity within a parallel constraint-satisfaction process (MacDonald, Pearlmutter, & Seidenberg, 1994a; Trueswell, Tanenhaus, & Garnsey, 1994). A crucial prediction of these models is that the frequency with which the verb is used as a participle form in the language should affect a reader's ability to consider the relative clause alternative. This prediction was confirmed in two self-paced reading experiments that directly manipulated participle frequency while controlling for the degree of contextual constraint. Implications for constraint-based lexicalist accounts of sentence comprehension are discussed.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1006/jmla.1996.0030

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The ambiguity in sentences like 'The plane left for...' is strongly constrained by the frequency with which the ambiguous verb occurs in transitive and passive structures.

    “Thus, the ambiguityis stronglyconstrained bythe frequencywith which the ambiguous verb occurs in transitive and passive structures, of which reduced relative clauses are a special type (MacDonald, 1994; MacDonald, Pearlmutter, & Seidenberg, 1994; Trueswell, 1996).”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Trueswell, J. C.
Affiliations
University of Pennsylvania (US)
Corresponding author
Trueswell, John C.
Venue
Journal of Memory and Language
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
1996-08
Volume
35
Issue
4
Pages
566-585
ISSN
0749-596X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2087315543
Cited by
277
References
2
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 26 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 9 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 9 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 11
FWCI
7.31
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
Journal of Memory and Language (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neurobiology of Language and Bilingualism
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Language and Linguistics › Syntax, Semantics, Linguistic Variation
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Reading and Literacy Development
Keywords
word frequency, syntactic ambiguity resolution, reduced relative clauses, constraint-based modeling, constraint satisfaction, sentence comprehension, self-paced reading, verb forms

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review