The DOI matches its Crossref record; 5 of the 5 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
PARSER: A Model for Word Segmentation
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
A theory of attention: Variations in the associability of stimuli with reinforcement
Mackintosh, N. J. (1975) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/h0076778 · Cited by 2,733
Word Segmentation: The Role of Distributional Cues
Saffran, J. R., Newport, E. L., & Aslin, R. N. (1996) · Journal of Memory and Language · doi:10.1006/jmla.1996.0032 · Cited by 1,405 · cited 11×
“In the Saffran et al. (1996a) experiments, the infants were presented with four items during the test.”
BackgroundMethodResultInfluentialIncidental Language Learning: Listening (and Learning) Out of the Corner of Your Ear
Saffran, J. R., Newport, E. L., Aslin, R. N., Tunick, R. A., & Barrueco, S. (1997) · Psychological Science · doi:10.1111/j.1467-9280.1997.tb00690.x · Cited by 675 · cited 9×
“These observations led us to hypothesize that the reduced amount of attention paid to the language was sufficient to account for the moderate level of performance reported in Saffran et al. (1997).”
BackgroundMethodResultInfluentialSynthetic grammar learning: Implicit rule abstraction or explicit fragmentary knowledge?
Perruchet, P., & Pacteau, C. (1990) · Journal of Experimental Psychology: General · doi:10.1037/0096-3445.119.3.264 · Cited by 526
Self-citationDistributional regularity and phonotactic constraints are useful for segmentation
Brent, M. R., & Cartwright, T. A. (1996) · Cognition · doi:10.1016/s0010-0277(96)00719-6 · Cited by 514 · cited 2×
“Recent psycholinguistic research has given evidence that these features may be used as cues for word boundaries during language acquisition (see Brent & Cartwright, 1996; Christiansen, Allen, & Seidenberg, in press; Jusczyk, 1997; McDonald, 1997).”
Background
Cited by
Infants rapidly learn word-referent mappings via cross-situational statistics
Smith, L., & Yu, C. (2008) · Cognition · doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2007.06.010 · Cited by 989
Neural representations of events arise from temporal community structure
Schapiro, A. C., Rogers, T. T., Cordova, N. I., Turk-Browne, N. B., & Botvinick, M. M. (2013) · Nature Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/nn.3331 · Cited by 556
Bannard, C., & Matthews, D. (2008) · Psychological Science · doi:10.1111/j.1467-9280.2008.02075.x · Cited by 518
Saffran, J. R., & Kirkham, N. Z. (2018) · Annual Review of Psychology · doi:10.1146/annurev-psych-122216-011805 · Cited by 426
Morphological decomposition based on the analysis of orthography
Rastle, K., & Davis, M. H. (2008) · Language and Cognitive Processes · doi:10.1080/01690960802069730 · Cited by 384
Metadata
- Authors
- Perruchet, P., & Vinter, A.
- Venue
- Journal of Memory and Language
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 1998-08
- Volume
- 39
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 246-263
- ISSN
- 0749-596X (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2095908250
- Cited by
- 367
- References
- 5
- FWCI
- 6.46
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: PARSER: A Model for Word Segmentation. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1006/jmla.1998.2576
- The paper
- Perruchet, P., & Vinter, A. (1998). PARSER: A Model for Word Segmentation. Journal of Memory and Language. https://doi.org/10.1006/jmla.1998.2576
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
