Cited by 1,405Language Development and DisordersPhonetics and Phonology ResearchReading and Literacy Development

Word Segmentation: The Role of Distributional Cues

Open access
Saffran, Jenny R., Newport, Elissa L., Aslin, Richard N.·1996·Journal of Memory and Language

Abstract

One of the infant's first tasks in language acquisition is to discover the words embedded in a mostly continuous speech stream. This learning problem might be solved by using distributional cues to word boundaries—for example, by computing the transitional probabilities between sounds in the language input and using the relative strengths of these probabilities to hypothesize word boundaries. The learner might be further aided by language-specific prosodic cues correlated with word boundaries. As a first step in testing these hypotheses, we briefly exposed adults to an artificial language in which the only cues available for word segmentation were the transitional probabilities between syllables. Subjects were able to learn the words of this language. Furthermore, the addition of certain prosodic cues served to enhance performance. These results suggest that distributional cues may play an important role in the initial word segmentation of language learners.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1006/jmla.1996.0032

Cites

16 of 16 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Infants may be able to exploit statistical cues to word boundaries.

    “infants may be able to exploit statistical cues to word boundaries”

    From Incidental Language Learning: Listening (and Learning) Out of the Corner of Your Ear (1997) · cites this paper as Saffran, Newport, & Aslin, 1996

  • In an explicit-learning task, adult subjects were able to use transitional probabilities to learn the multisyllabic words of an artificial language presented as a synthesized speech stream containing no other cues to word boundaries.

    “We (Saffran et al., 1996) demonstrated, in an explicit-learning task, that adult subjects were able to use transitional probabilities to learn the multisyllabic words of an artificial language presented as a synthesized speech stream containing no other cues to word boundaries.”

    From Incidental Language Learning: Listening (and Learning) Out of the Corner of Your Ear (1997) · cites this paper as Saffran et al., 1996

  • The input was quite impoverished, containing neither utterance boundaries nor the acoustic and prosodic cues that are probabilistically correlated with word boundaries in some languages.

    “the input was quite impoverished, containing neither utterance boundaries nor the acoustic and prosodic cues that are probabilistically correlated with word boundaries in some languages”

    From Incidental Language Learning: Listening (and Learning) Out of the Corner of Your Ear (1997) · cites this paper as Saffran et al., 1996

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

46 of the 62 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Saffran, J. R., Newport, E. L., & Aslin, R. N.
Affiliations
University of Rochester (US)
Venue
Journal of Memory and Language
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
1996-08
Volume
35
Issue
4
Pages
606-621
ISSN
0749-596X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2115867364
Cited by
1,405
References
62
Citations by year
2026: 35 · 2025: 49 · 2024: 109 · 2023: 43 · 2022: 52 · 2021: 52 · 2020: 67 · 2019: 104 · 2018: 41 · 2017: 95 · 2016: 44 · 2015: 62 · 2014: 65 · 2013: 56 · 2012: 51
FWCI
19.67
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
Journal of Memory and Language (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Language Development and Disorders
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Phonetics and Phonology Research
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Reading and Literacy Development
Keywords
word segmentation, distributional cues, transition probabilities, prosodic cues, artificial language learning, infant language acquisition, word boundary detection, statistical learning

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review