Word Segmentation: The Role of Distributional Cues
Open accessAbstract
One of the infant's first tasks in language acquisition is to discover the words embedded in a mostly continuous speech stream. This learning problem might be solved by using distributional cues to word boundaries—for example, by computing the transitional probabilities between sounds in the language input and using the relative strengths of these probabilities to hypothesize word boundaries. The learner might be further aided by language-specific prosodic cues correlated with word boundaries. As a first step in testing these hypotheses, we briefly exposed adults to an artificial language in which the only cues available for word segmentation were the transitional probabilities between syllables. Subjects were able to learn the words of this language. Furthermore, the addition of certain prosodic cues served to enhance performance. These results suggest that distributional cues may play an important role in the initial word segmentation of language learners.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Infants may be able to exploit statistical cues to word boundaries.
“infants may be able to exploit statistical cues to word boundaries”
From Incidental Language Learning: Listening (and Learning) Out of the Corner of Your Ear (1997) · cites this paper as Saffran, Newport, & Aslin, 1996
In an explicit-learning task, adult subjects were able to use transitional probabilities to learn the multisyllabic words of an artificial language presented as a synthesized speech stream containing no other cues to word boundaries.
“We (Saffran et al., 1996) demonstrated, in an explicit-learning task, that adult subjects were able to use transitional probabilities to learn the multisyllabic words of an artificial language presented as a synthesized speech stream containing no other cues to word boundaries.”
From Incidental Language Learning: Listening (and Learning) Out of the Corner of Your Ear (1997) · cites this paper as Saffran et al., 1996
The input was quite impoverished, containing neither utterance boundaries nor the acoustic and prosodic cues that are probabilistically correlated with word boundaries in some languages.
“the input was quite impoverished, containing neither utterance boundaries nor the acoustic and prosodic cues that are probabilistically correlated with word boundaries in some languages”
From Incidental Language Learning: Listening (and Learning) Out of the Corner of Your Ear (1997) · cites this paper as Saffran et al., 1996
Cites
Elman, J. L. (1990) · Cognitive Science · doi:10.1207/s15516709cog1402_1 · Cited by 11,212 · see citing works
Quine, W. V. O. (1960) · The MIT Press eBooks · doi:10.7551/mitpress/9636.001.0001 · Cited by 7,572 · cited 2× · see citing works
“However, the relationship lem might first be approached by an extraction mechanism: perceptually salient units, such as between the semantics of the world and the child’s linguistic input is notoriously complistressed and certain acoustically distinctive final syllables, might be extracted and identi- cated (Gleitman,…”
BackgroundLinguistic experience alters phonetic perception in infants by 6 months of age
Kuhl, P. K., Williams, K. A., Lacerda, F., Stevens, K. N., & Lindblom, B. (1992) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1736364 · Cited by 2,086 · see citing works
The Structural Sources of Verb Meanings
Gleitman, L. (1990) · Language Acquisition · doi:10.1207/s15327817la0101_2 · Cited by 1,783 · see citing works
Probability of shock in the presence and absence of cs in fear conditioning.
Rescorla, R. A. (1968) · Journal of Comparative and Physiological Psychology · doi:10.1037/h0025984 · Cited by 1,067 · see citing works
Infants' sensitivity to phonotactic patterns in the native language.
Jusczyk, P., Luce, P. A., & Charles-Luce, J. (1994) · Journal of Memory and Language · doi:10.1006/jmla.1994.1030 · Cited by 858 · see citing works
Infants′ Sensitivity to the Sound Patterns of Native Language Words
Jusczyk, P., Friederici, A., Wessels, J., Svenkerud, V. Y., & Jusczyk, A. M. (1993) · Journal of Memory and Language · doi:10.1006/jmla.1993.1022 · Cited by 750 · see citing works
Vowel Lengthening is Syntactically Determined in a Connected Discourse.
Klatt, D. (1975) · Journal of Phonetics · doi:10.1016/s0095-4470(19)31360-9 · Cited by 534 · cited 1× · see citing works
“On this view, it is possible that perfor-Klatt, 1975; Oller, 1973; Umeda, 1975).”
BackgroundThe effect of position in utterance on speech segment duration in English.
Oller, D. K. (1973) · Journal of the Acoustical Society of America · doi:10.1121/1.1914393 · Cited by 463 · see citing works
Introduction to Theoretical Linguistics
Hoenigswald, H., & Lyons, J. (1971) · Language · doi:10.2307/412090 · Cited by 361 · cited 1× · see citing works
“Words may be defined in distributional terms,boundaries, including word-initial strong syllables in English and word-final accent in along the lines of other syntactic constituents (e.g., Lyons, 1968).”
BackgroundUsing sound to solve syntactic problems: The role of phonology in grammatical category assignments.
Kelly, M. H. (1992) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/0033-295x.99.2.349 · Cited by 319 · see citing works
Harris, Z. S. (1955) · Language · doi:10.2307/411036 · Cited by 256 · cited 1× · see citing works
“More-least to Harris (1955), who proposed that linguists working on unfamiliar languages might over, the structure of their test was such that even these results might be in part the outcomediscover the individual word units by counting how many phones can succeed a given string. of test strategies…”
BackgroundA selection model for motion processing in area MT of primates
Nowlan, S., & Sejnowski, T. (1995) · Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1523/jneurosci.15-02-01195.1995 · Cited by 206 · see citing works
Segmentation problems, rhythmic solutions *
Cutler, A. (1994) · Lingua · doi:10.1016/0024-3841(94)90338-7 · Cited by 171 · see citing works
Cognitive models of speech processing : the Second Sperlonga Meeting
Altmann, G., & Shillcock, R. (1993) · doi:10.4324/9780203775745 · Cited by 170
deChene, B., & Hyman, L. M. (1981) · doi:10.2307/413704 · Cited by 92
Flagged first, then by citations
46 of the 62 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Statistical learning by 8-month-old infants
Saffran, J. R., Aslin, R. N., & Newport, E. L. (1996) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.274.5294.1926 · Cited by 5,659 · see citing works
Self-citationStatistical learning of tone sequences by human infants and adults
Saffran, J. R., Johnson, E. K., Aslin, R. N., & Newport, E. L. (1999) · Cognition · doi:10.1016/s0010-0277(98)00075-4 · Cited by 1,429 · see citing works
“As in the linguistic materials used by Saffran et al. (1996b), there were no acoustic markers of word boundaries.”
BackgroundMethodResultInfluentialSelf-citationInfant sensitivity to distributional information can affect phonetic discrimination
Maye, J., Werker, J. F., & Gerken, L. (2002) · Cognition · doi:10.1016/s0010-0277(01)00157-3 · Cited by 1,364 · see citing works
Talking to Children Matters: Early Language Experience Strengthens Processing and Builds Vocabulary
Weisleder, A., & Fernald, A. (2013) · Psychological Science · doi:10.1177/0956797613488145 · Cited by 1,273 · see citing works
Computation of conditional probability statistics by 8-month-old infants
Aslin, R. N., Saffran, J. R., & Newport, E. L. (1998) · Psychological Science · doi:10.1111/1467-9280.00063 · Cited by 1,189 · see citing works
Self-citationThe beginnings of word segmentation in english-learning infants.
Jusczyk, P., Houston, D., & Newsome, M. (1999) · Cognitive Psychology · doi:10.1006/cogp.1999.0716 · Cited by 962 · see citing works
“Other potential sources include context- or position-sensitive allophones (Church, 1987b; Gow & Gordon, 1995; Lehiste, 1960), phonotactic cues (Brent & Cartwright, 1996; Cairns et al., 1997), and distributional (or statistical) cues (Brent & Cartwright, 1996; Saffran et al., 1996b ).”
Variability and Detection of Invariant Structure
Gómez, R. (2002) · Psychology Science · doi:10.1111/1467-9280.00476 · Cited by 898 · see citing works
Language as shaped by the brain.
Christiansen, M. H., & Chater, N. (2008) · Behavioral and Brain Sciences · doi:10.1017/s0140525x08004998 · Cited by 821 · see citing works
“Sequential learning has thus been demonstrated for a variety of different aspects of language, including: speech segmentation (Curtin et al. 2005; Saffran et al. 1996a; 1996b); discovering complex word-internal structure between nonadjacent elements (Newport & Aslin 2004; Onnis et al. 2005; Peña…”
BackgroundLearning at a distance I. Statistical learning of non-adjacent dependencies.
Newport, E., & Aslin, R. (2004) · Cognitive Psychology · doi:10.1016/s0010-0285(03)00128-2 · Cited by 735 · see citing works
Self-citationRapid Word Learning Under Uncertainty via Cross-Situational Statistics
Chen, Y., & Smith, L. B. (2007) · Psychology Science · doi:10.1111/j.1467-9280.2007.01915.x · Cited by 699 · see citing works
Word Segmentation by 8-Month-Olds: When Speech Cues Count More Than Statistics
Johnson, E. K., & Jusczyk, P. (2001) · Journal of Memory and Language · doi:10.1006/jmla.2000.2755 · Cited by 691 · see citing works
“Saffran, Newport, and Aslin (1996) did examine possible interactions between statistical and stress cues in a study with adults.”
BackgroundMathematical Foundations for a Compositional Distributional Model of MeaningPreprint
Coecke, B., Sadrzadeh, M., & Clark, S. (2010) · arXiv.org · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1003.4394 · Cited by 685 · see citing works
“• they are created objectively and automatically from text; • they allow the representation of gradations of meaning; • they relate well to experimental evidence indicating that the human cognitive system is sensitive to distributional information [34, 40].”
BackgroundIncidental Language Learning: Listening (and Learning) Out of the Corner of Your Ear
Saffran, J. R., Newport, E. L., Aslin, R. N., Tunick, R. A., & Barrueco, S. (1997) · Psychological Science · doi:10.1111/j.1467-9280.1997.tb00690.x · Cited by 675 · see citing works
“We (Saffran et al., 1996) demonstrated, in an explicit-learning task, that adult subjects were able to use transitional probabilities to learn the multisyllabic words of an artificial language presented as a synthesized speech stream containing no other cues to word boundaries.”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialSelf-citationHaidt, J., & Joseph, C. (2008) · The Innate Mind, Volume 3 · doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195332834.003.0019 · Cited by 650 · see citing works
Human simulations of vocabulary learning.
Gillette, J., Gleitman, H., Gleitman, L., & Lederer, A. (1999) · Cognition · doi:10.1016/s0010-0277(99)00036-0 · Cited by 644 · see citing works
“The Human Simulation paradigm provides support for an incremental constraintsatisfaction view of how children acquire their native tongue (for related discussion, see Kelly & Martin, 1994; Saffran et al., 1996; Seidenberg & MacDonald, 1999).”
BackgroundMethodStatistical learning of higher-order temporal structure from visual shape sequences.
Fiser, J., & Aslin, R. (2002) · Journal of Experimental Psychology. Learning, Memory and Cognition · doi:10.1037//0278-7393.28.3.458 · Cited by 641 · see citing works
“Of interest, this same asymmetry was obtained by Saffran, Newport, and Aslin (1996) in the auditory domain, although the structure of their part triplets was slightly different (X-1-2 and 2-3-”
BackgroundSelf-citationPerceiving, remembering, and communicating structure in events.
Zacks, J. M., Tversky, B., & Iyer, G. (2001) · Journal of Experimental Psychology: General · doi:10.1037/0096-3445.130.1.29 · Cited by 640 · see citing works
Robust speech perception: Recognize the familiar, generalize to the similar, and adapt to the novel.
Kleinschmidt, D., & Jaeger, T. F. (2015) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/a0038695 · Cited by 638 · see citing works
Kam, C. L. H., & Newport, E. (2005) · Language Learning and Development · doi:10.1080/15475441.2005.9684215 · Cited by 598 · see citing works
Self-citationBigand, E., & Poulin-Charronnat, B. (2006) · Cognition · doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2005.11.007 · Cited by 537 · see citing works
Statistical Learning in Children With Specific Language Impairment
Evans, J., Saffran, J. R., & Robe-Torres, K. (2009) · Journal of Speech, Language and Hearing Research · doi:10.1044/1092-4388(2009/07-0189 · Cited by 529 · see citing works
Self-citationInstructed SLA: Constraints, Compensation, and Enhancement
Doughty, C. J. (2003) · The Handbook of Second Language Acquisition · doi:10.1002/9780470756492.ch10 · Cited by 519 · see citing works
Distributional regularity and phonotactic constraints are useful for segmentation
Brent, M. R., & Cartwright, T. A. (1996) · Cognition · doi:10.1016/s0010-0277(96)00719-6 · Cited by 514 · see citing works
A Bayesian framework for word segmentation: exploring the effects of context.
Goldwater, S., Griffiths, T., & Johnson, M. A. (2009) · Cognition · doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2009.03.008 · Cited by 506 · see citing works
“These facts have caused some researchers to propose that strategies based on statistical sequencing information are a crucial first step in bootstrapping word segmentation (Thiessen and Saffran, 2003), and have provoked a great deal of interest in these strategies (Saffran et al., 1996b; Saffran et…”
InfluentialMorphological decomposition based on the analysis of orthography
Rastle, K., & Davis, M. H. (2008) · Language and Cognitive Processes · doi:10.1080/01690960802069730 · Cited by 494 · see citing works
“Further, both adults and 8-month-old infants use these sequential probabilities in segmenting words from connected speech sequences in artificial language studies (Saffran, Newport, & Aslin, 1996a ; Saffran, Aslin, & Newport, 1996b ).”
BackgroundSignal-Driven Computations in Speech Processing
Peña, M., Bonatti, L., Nespor, M., & Mehler, J. (2002) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1072901 · Cited by 454 · see citing works
Shaping of Object Representations in the Human Medial Temporal Lobe Based on Temporal Regularities
Schapiro, A. C., Kustner, L. V., & Turk-Browne, N. B. (2012) · Current Biology · doi:10.1016/j.cub.2012.06.056 · Cited by 430 · see citing works
“Thus, irrespective of awareness, the hippocampus is well-suited to forms of statistical learning that can occur after minimal exposure [2, 3].”
PARSER: A Model for Word Segmentation
Perruchet, P., & Vinter, A. (1998) · Journal of Memory and Language · doi:10.1006/jmla.1998.2576 · Cited by 423 · see citing works
“In the Saffran et al. (1996a) experiments, the infants were presented with four items during the test.”
BackgroundMethodResultInfluentialHauser, M. D., Newport, E. L., & Aslin, R. N. (2001) · Cognition · doi:10.1016/s0010-0277(00)00132-3 · Cited by 419 · see citing works
Self-citationRapid Expectation Adaptation during Syntactic Comprehension
Fine, A. B., Jaeger, T., Farmer, T. A., & Qian, T. (2013) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0077661 · Cited by 403 · see citing works
“Finally, previous work on statistical learning [63–65] would correspond, in Figure 1, to probing (typically offline) whether subjects have learned the distribution of linguistic items in the experiment (e.”
BackgroundConstraints on Statistical Language Learning
Saffran, J. R. (2002) · Journal of Memory and Language · doi:10.1006/jmla.2001.2839 · Cited by 396 · see citing works
Self-citationExperimental Support for a Categorical Compositional Distributional Model of MeaningPreprint
Grefenstette, E., & Sadrzadeh, M. (2011) · Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1106.4058 · Cited by 395 · see citing works
Phonotactic cues for segmentation of fluent speech by infants.
Mattys, S., & Jusczyk, P. (2001) · Cognition · doi:10.1016/s0010-0277(00)00109-8 · Cited by 386 · see citing works
Getting it right by getting it wrong: When learners change languages
Kam, C. L. H., & Newport, E. (2009) · Cognitive Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.cogpsych.2009.01.001 · Cited by 380 · see citing works
Self-citationSnedeker, J., & Trueswell, J. (2004) · Cognitive Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.cogpsych.2004.03.001 · Cited by 372 · see citing works
Segmentation of Continuous Speech Using Phonotactics
McQueen, J. (1998) · doi:10.1006/jmla.1998.2568 · Cited by 370
The Encoding of Speech Sounds in the Superior Temporal Gyrus
Yi, H. G., Leonard, M. K., & Chang, E. F. (2019) · Neuron · doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2019.04.023 · Cited by 409 · see citing works
“can provide a strong foundation for binding input into perceptually coherent and meaningful units like words (Figure 4C; Brent and Cartwright, 1996; McQueen, 1998; Saffran et al., 1996),”
BackgroundLearning to Segment Speech Using Multiple Cues: A Connectionist Model
Christiansen, M. H., Allen, J., & Seidenberg, M. S. (1998) · Language and Cognitive Processes · doi:10.1080/016909698386528 · Cited by 356 · see citing works
How infants begin to extract words from speech.
Jusczyk, P. (1999) · Trends in Cognitive Sciences · doi:10.1016/s1364-6613(99)01363-7 · Cited by 356 · see citing works
Grammatical gender in L2: A production or a real-time processing problem?
Grüter, T., Lew-Williams, C., & Fernald, A. (2012) · Second Language Research · doi:10.1177/0267658312437990 · Cited by 346 · see citing works
“The computation of co-occurrence relations, and transitional probabilities more generally, has been shown to be a key mechanism in infants’ early language learning (Saffran et al., 1996).”
BackgroundContextual Dependencies in Unsupervised Word Segmentation
Goldwater, S., Griffiths, T., & Johnson, M. (2006) · Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics · doi:10.3115/1220175.1220260 · Cited by 336 · see citing works
“Statistics that have been proposed for measuring these differences include “successor frequency” (Harris, 1954), “transitional probabilities” (Saffran et al., 1996), mutual information (Sun et al.”
BackgroundAn Efficient, Probabilistically Sound Algorithm for Segmentation and Word Discovery
Brent, M. (1999) · Machine-mediated learning · doi:10.1023/a:1007541817488 · Cited by 336 · see citing works
“Saffran, Newport, and Aslin (1996) suggest that children may segment utterances at low points of the transitional probability between adjacent syllables—that is, when a syllable occurs that is surprising given its predecessor.”
A unified model of early word learning: Integrating statistical and social cues
Yu, C., & Ballard, D. (2007) · Neurocomputing · doi:10.1016/j.neucom.2006.01.034 · Cited by 329 · see citing works
“There is growing evidence that babies do possess powerful statistical learning mechanisms [23].”
BackgroundInfluentialCauses and Consequences of Word Structure
Hay, J. (2003) · Routledge eBooks · doi:10.4324/9780203495131 · Cited by 324 · see citing works
Distant melodies: statistical learning of nonadjacent dependencies in tone sequences.
Creel, S. C., Newport, E., & Aslin, R. (2004) · Journal of Experimental Psychology. Learning, Memory and Cognition · doi:10.1037/0278-7393.30.5.1119 · Cited by 313 · see citing works
“…with transitional probabilities of 0, even though there were no " dips " in these adjacent transitional probabilities as in previous statistical learning experiments (Saffran et al., 1996), and the part-triplet test items crossed the boundaries of the coherent, interleaved nonadjacent triplets.”
ResultSelf-citationSpeech segmentation by statistical learning depends on attention.
Toro, J. M., Sinnett, S., & Soto-Faraco, S. (2005) · Cognition · doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2005.01.006 · Cited by 311 · see citing works
Songs as an aid for language acquisition.
Schön, D., Boyer, M., Moreno, S., Besson, M., Peretz, I., & Kolinsky, R. (2008) · Cognition · doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2007.03.005 · Cited by 305 · see citing works
Shake, rattle, 'n' roll: the representation of motion in language and cognition.
Papafragou, A., Massey, C. M., & Gleitman, L. (2002) · Cognition · doi:10.1016/s0010-0277(02)00046-x · Cited by 299 · see citing works
“The past 20 years of perceptual, linguistic, and cognitive investigation in the information-processing framework have heavily documented the notion of contingent frequency as fundamental for describing both animal and human behavior (Gallistel & Gibbon, 2000; Rescorla & Wagner, 1972; Saffran, Newport, & Aslin, 1996 ).”
Pure Reasoning in 12-Month-Old Infants as Probabilistic Inference
Téglás, E., Vul, E., Girotto, V., Gonzalez, M., Tenenbaum, J., & Bonatti, L. (2011) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1196404 · Cited by 296 · see citing works
Bayesian learning of visual chunks by human observers
Orbán, G., Fiser, J., Aslin, R., & Lengyel, M. (2008) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · doi:10.1073/pnas.0708424105 · Cited by 291 · see citing works
“Past attempts to study the learning of statistics and rules have been conducted in domains such as artificial grammar learning (12, 13), serial reaction times (14, 15), word segmentation from fluent speech (16, 17), and pattern abstraction from strings of words (18, 19).”
BackgroundSelf-citationThe Use of Predictive Dependencies in Language Learning
Saffran, J. R. (2001) · Journal of Memory and Language · doi:10.1006/jmla.2000.2759 · Cited by 286 · see citing works
“…languages containing natural language-like properties serve as a tool to investigate basic processes in language acquisition (e.g., Braine, 1971; Braine et al., 1990; Moeser & Bregman, 1972; Morgan et al., 1987, 1989; Morgan & Newport, 1981; Saffran et al., 1996, 1997; Valian & Coulson, 1988).”
Self-citationInfants’ sensitivity to allophonic cues for word segmentation
Jusczyk, P., Hohne, E. A., & Bauman, A. (1999) · Perception & Psychophysics · doi:10.3758/bf03213111 · Cited by 285 · see citing works
Procedural Learning in Adolescents With and Without Specific Language Impairment
Tomblin, J., Mainela-Arnold, E., & Zhang, X.-Y. (2007) · Language Learning and Development · doi:10.1080/15475440701377477 · Cited by 284 · see citing works
“Such learning has been demonstrated across a variety of situations, including speech segmentation (Saffran et al., 1996a; Saffran et al., 1996b; Christiansen et al., 1998), learning the orthographic regularities of written words (Pacton et al., 2001), visuomotor learning (Hunt & Aslin, 2001), and tone sequences (Saffr…”
BackgroundStatistical Learning of Syntax: The Role of Transitional Probability
Thompson, S. P., & Newport, E. (2007) · Language Learning and Development · doi:10.1080/15475440709336999 · Cited by 284 · see citing works
“Saffran, Newport, and Aslin (1996) suggested that the learning mechanism involved computing the transitional probability of adjacent syllables, using the peaks in transitional probability to group syllables, into words, while using the dips in transitional probability to form breaks between words.”
BackgroundSelf-citationLearning biases predict a word order universal.
Culbertson, J., Smolensky, P., & Legendre, G. (2012) · Cognition · doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2011.10.017 · Cited by 269 · see citing works
Williams, J. N. (2005) · Studies in Second Language Acquisition · doi:10.1017/s0272263105050138 · Cited by 267 · see citing works
Recognizing speech under a processing load: dissociating energetic from informational factors.
Mattys, S., Brooks, J. L., & Cooke, M. (2009) · Cognitive Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.cogpsych.2009.04.001 · Cited by 256 · see citing works
Leading Up the Lexical Garden Path: Segmentation and Ambiguity in Spoken Word Recognition
Davis, M. H., Marslen-Wilson, W., & Gaskell, M. (2002) · Journal of Experimental Psychology Human Perception & Performance · doi:10.1037/0096-1523.28.1.218 · Cited by 256 · see citing works
Acquiring and processing verb argument structure: distributional learning in a miniature language.
Wonnacott, E., Newport, E., & Tanenhaus, M. (2008) · Cognitive Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.cogpsych.2007.04.002 · Cited by 252 · see citing works
“…over the input to learning is now well established (Aslin, Saffran, & Newport, 1998; Braine, 1963; Gerken, 2006; Gomez, 2002; Hudson Kam & Newport, 2005; Mintz, 2002; Moeser & Bregman, 1972; Morgan, Meier, & Newport, 1987; Morgan & Newport, 1981; Saffran et al., 1996; Wonnacott & Newport, 2005).”
BackgroundSelf-citationThe Effect of Thematic Roles on Pronoun Use and Frequency of Reference Continuation
Arnold, J. E. (2001) · Discourse Processes · doi:10.1207/s15326950dp3102_02 · Cited by 250 · see citing works
Erickson, L., & Thiessen, E. D. (2015) · Developmental Review · doi:10.1016/j.dr.2015.05.002 · Cited by 246 · see citing works
Is Compensation for Coarticulation Mediated by the Lexicon
Pitt, M. A., & McQueen, J. (1998) · Journal of Memory and Language · doi:10.1006/jmla.1998.2571 · Cited by 246 · see citing works
“These findings provide another piece of evidence to the growing literature that suggests listeners are sensitive to the statistical regularities of the language (e.g., McQueen & Pitt, 1996; Saffran et al., 1996).”
BackgroundVisually timed action: time-out for 'tau'?
Tresilian, J. R. (1999) · Trends in Cognitive Sciences · doi:10.1016/s1364-6613(99)01352-2 · Cited by 243 · see citing works
Sources of linguistic knowledge in the second language acquisition of English articles
Ionin, T., Zubizarreta, M., & Maldonado, S. (2008) · Lingua · doi:10.1016/j.lingua.2006.11.012 · Cited by 242 · see citing works
The self-organizing consciousness.
Perruchet, P., & Vinter, A. (2002) · Behavioral and Brain Sciences · doi:10.1017/s0140525x02000067 · Cited by 234 · see citing works
“What is the phenomenal experience of the listener of a new language such as the one used in the Saffran et al. experiments, at the beginning and end of training, respectively? When people are confronted with material consisting of a succession of elements, each of them matching some of their processing primitives, the…”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialThe time course of spoken word learning and recognition: studies with artificial lexicons.
Magnuson, J., Tanenhaus, M., Aslin, R., & Dahan, D. (2003) · Journal of experimental psychology. General · doi:10.1037/0096-3445.132.2.202 · Cited by 231 · see citing works
“Artificial linguistic materials have been successfully used to provide precise control over distributional information in several domains of language acquisition and processing (e.g., Braine, 1963; Gomez & Gerken, 2000; Morgan, Meier, & Newport, 1987; Saffran, Newport, & Aslin, 1996 ).”
MethodSelf-citationThe associative structure of language: Contextual diversity in early word learning
Hills, T. T., Maouene, J., Riordan, B., & Smith, L. B. (2010) · Journal of Memory and Language · doi:10.1016/j.jml.2010.06.002 · Cited by 238 · see citing works
Statistical computations over a speech stream in a rodent
Toro, J. M., & Trobalón, J. B. (2005) · Perception & Psychophysics · doi:10.3758/bf03193539 · Cited by 227 · see citing works
Understanding how input matters: verb learning and the footprint of universal grammar.
Lidz, J., Gleitman, H., & Gleitman, L. (2003) · Cognition · doi:10.1016/s0010-0277(02)00230-5 · Cited by 226 · see citing works
Mapping theories of developmental language impairment: Premises, predictions and evidence
Chiat, S. (2001) · Language and Cognitive Processes · doi:10.1080/01690960042000012 · Cited by 226 · see citing works
Prosody guides the rapid mapping of auditory word forms onto visual objects in 6-mo-old infants
Shukla, M., White, K. S., & Aslin, R. (2011) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · doi:10.1073/pnas.1017617108 · Cited by 220 · see citing works
“Given that infants are sensitive to the syllable as a unit of speech (10), computing statistical relations between syllables has been proposed to be a general mechanism that can parse sequences, generating as potential candidate words those syllable sequences that have high statistical coherence (4, 11).”
BackgroundSelf-citationStress changes the representational landscape: evidence from word segmentation.
Curtin, S., Mintz, T. H., & Christiansen, M. H. (2005) · Cognition · doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2004.08.005 · Cited by 217 · see citing works
Segmenting nonsense: an event-related potential index of perceived onsets in continuous speech
Sanders, L. D., Newport, E., & Neville, H. (2002) · Nature Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/nn873 · Cited by 216 · see citing works
“Behavioral studies provide evidence that a wide range of segmentation cues contribute to adults' ability to segment continuous speec”
BackgroundSelf-citationHunt, R. H., & Aslin, R. (2001) · Journal of experimental psychology. General · doi:10.1037//0096-3445.130.4.658 · Cited by 216 · see citing works
“When a set of pure tones was substituted for the speech syllables used in the original Saffran, Newport, and Aslin (1996) study, adults showed the same ability to learn tone sequences that they had shown for syllable sequences.”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialSelf-citationImplicit and explicit contributions to statistical learning
Batterink, L. J., Reber, P., Neville, H., & Paller, K. A. (2015) · Journal of Memory and Language · doi:10.1016/j.jml.2015.04.004 · Cited by 215 · see citing works
“…nature (either transitional probabilities, which were higher within words than across word boundaries, or frequency of cooccurrence, which were higher for the three syllable sequences within words than across words; cf. Saffran et al., 1996b; Saffran et al., 1997; Aslin, Saffran & Newport, 1998).”
InfluentialChildren's implicit learning of graphotactic and morphological regularities.
Pacton, S., Fayol, M., & Perruchet, P. (2005) · Child Development · doi:10.1111/j.1467-8624.2005.00848_a.x · Cited by 214 · see citing works
The neural correlates of statistical learning in a word segmentation task: An fMRI study
Karuza, E. A., Newport, E., Aslin, R., Starling, S., Tivarus, M., & Bavelier, D. (2013) · Brain and Language · doi:10.1016/j.bandl.2012.11.007 · Cited by 213 · see citing works
Self-citationLearning phonotactic constraints from brief auditory experience.
Onishi, K., Chambers, K. E., & Fisher, C. (2002) · Cognition · doi:10.1016/s0010-0277(01)00165-2 · Cited by 213 · see citing works
Category induction from distributional cues in an artificial language
Mintz, T. H. (2002) · Memory & Cognition · doi:10.3758/bf03196424 · Cited by 205 · see citing works
“This option was provided to keep participants from becoming bored during the task, and has been used successfully (for slightly different purposes) by Saffran, Newport, and Aslin (1996).”
MethodOn-Line Individual Differences in Statistical Learning Predict Language Processing
Misyak, J., Christiansen, M. H., & Tomblin, J. (2010) · Front. Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2010.00031 · Cited by 204 · see citing works
“…and psychological disorders (e.g., Reber, 1993; Cleeremans et al., 1998), with many studies showing remarkable similarities in infant, child, and adult learning (e.g., Cherry and Stadler, 1995; Saffran et al., 1996a,b; Thomas and Nelson, 2001; Fiser and Aslin, 2002a,b; Gómez, 2002; Saffran, 2002).”
BackgroundMonaghan, P., Christiansen, M. H., & Chater, N. (2007) · Cognitive Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.cogpsych.2006.12.001 · Cited by 200 · see citing works
Cracking the Language Code: Neural Mechanisms Underlying Speech Parsing
Mcnealy, K., Mazziotta, J., & Dapretto, M. (2006) · Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1523/jneurosci.5501-05.2006 · Cited by 198 · see citing works
“…specify word boundaries, research has shown that infants as young as 7.5 months of age can use statistical regularities such as the greater co-occurrence of syllables within words than between words to successfully parse a continuous stream of speech (Saffran et al., 1996a; Aslin et al., 1998).”
BackgroundMethodResultInfluentialAn interaction between prosody and statistics in the segmentation of fluent speech.
Shukla, M., Nespor, M., & Mehler, J. (2007) · Cognitive Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.cogpsych.2006.04.002 · Cited by 196 · see citing works
“In previous experiments (e.g., Saffran et al., 1996; Peña et al., 2002), where up to 6 ‘words’ were concatenated at random, the TP from the last syllable of one ‘word’ to the first syllable of another was 0.24 (since immediate repetitions are not allowed, each ‘word’ can be followed by one of the…”
BackgroundMethodResultInfluentialLinguistic Constraints on Statistical Computations
Bonatti, L., Peña, M., Nespor, M., & Mehler, J. (2005) · Psychology Science · doi:10.1111/j.0956-7976.2005.01556.x · Cited by 193 · see citing works
Cross-language differences in cue use for speech segmentation.
Tyler, M., & Cutler, A. (2009) · Journal of the Acoustical Society of America · doi:10.1121/1.3129127 · Cited by 184
Modeling human performance in statistical word segmentation.
Frank, M. C., Goldwater, S., Mansinghka, V. K., Griffiths, T., & Tenenbaum, J. (2010) · Cognition · doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2010.07.005 · Cited by 183 · see citing works
The Role of Embodied Intention in Early Lexical Acquisition
Chen, Y., Ballard, D., & Aslin, R. (2005) · Cognitive Sciences · doi:10.1207/s15516709cog0000_40 · Cited by 182 · see citing works
“Previous language-learning studies have shown similar findings for adults exposed to an artificial language and children or even infants exposed to the same type of language ( Saffran, Newport, & Aslin, 1996 ).”
ResultSelf-citationArciuli, J., & Simpson, I. C. (2011) · Developmental Science · doi:10.1111/j.1467-7687.2009.00937.x · Cited by 181 · see citing works
Finding Words and Rules in a Speech Stream
Toro, J. M., Nespor, M., Mehler, J., & Bonatti, L. (2008) · Psychology Science · doi:10.1111/j.1467-9280.2008.02059.x · Cited by 180 · see citing works
“Indeed, humans can compute statistical relations (in particular, transitional probabilities, or TPs) that can be useful to identify lexical elements in continuous speech (e.g., Saffran, Newport, & Aslin, 1996 ).”
BackgroundImplicit Statistical Learning: A Tale of Two Literatures
Christiansen, M. H. (2019) · Topics in Cognitive Science · doi:10.1111/tops.12332 · Cited by 178 · see citing works
First-language phonotactics in second-language listening.
Weber, A., & Cutler, A. (2006) · Journal of the Acoustical Society of America · doi:10.1121/1.2141003 · Cited by 176 · see citing works
Speciale, G., Ellis, N., & Bywater, T. (2004) · Applied Psycholinguistics · doi:10.1017/s0142716404001146 · Cited by 174 · see citing works
Changing Structures in Midstream: Learning Along the Statistical Garden Path
Gebhart, A. L., Aslin, R., & Newport, E. (2009) · Cognitive Sciences · doi:10.1111/j.1551-6709.2009.01041.x · Cited by 168 · see citing works
Self-citationThe Roles of Word Stress and Vowel Harmony in Speech Segmentation
Vroomen, J., Tuomainen, J., & de Gelder, B. (1998) · doi:10.1006/jmla.1997.2548 · Cited by 166
“The 1 Saffran, Newport, and Aslin (1996) used lengthening effect of vowel harmony and all other interacof the vowel as a cue for lexical stress.”
BackgroundSpeech segmentation and word discovery: a computational perspective
Brent, M. R. (1999) · Trends in Cognitive Sciences · doi:10.1016/s1364-6613(99)01350-9 · Cited by 163 · see citing works
Do infants segment words or recurring contiguous patterns?
Mattys, S., & Jusczyk, P. (2001) · Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance · doi:10.1037/0096-1523.27.3.644 · Cited by 162 · see citing works
“…(1996) computational Incremental Distributional Regularity Optimization (INCDROP) model suggests and data from Saffran, Aslin, et al. (1996) and Saffran, Newport, and Aslin (1996) illustrate, high transitional probability between speech segments tends to promote cohesion in the percept ,…”
BackgroundStatistical Learning of Adjacent and Non-Adjacent Dependencies among Non-Linguistic Sounds
Gebhart, A. L., Newport, E., & Aslin, R. (2009) · Psychonomic Bulletin & Review · doi:10.3758/pbr.16.3.486 · Cited by 157 · see citing works
Self-citationSpeech errors reflect newly learned phonotactic constraints.
Warker, J. A., & Dell, G. (2006) · Journal of Experimental Psychology. Learning, Memory and Cognition · doi:10.1037/0278-7393.32.2.387 · Cited by 157 · see citing works
Phonological Memory and Rule Learning
Williams, J. N., & Lovatt, P. (2003) · Language Learning · doi:10.1111/1467-9922.00211 · Cited by 156 · see citing works
Online neural monitoring of statistical learning
Batterink, L. J., & Paller, K. A. (2017) · Cortex; a journal devoted to the study of the nervous system and behavior · doi:10.1016/j.cortex.2017.02.004 · Cited by 155 · see citing works
“Learners can discover word boundaries by computing the transitional probabilities between neighboring syllables, which are higher within words compared to across word boundaries (Saffran et al., 1996a, 1996b).”
BackgroundMethod
- Authors
- Saffran, J. R., Newport, E. L., & Aslin, R. N.
- Affiliations
- University of Rochester (US)
- Venue
- Journal of Memory and Language
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 1996-08
- Volume
- 35
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 606-621
- ISSN
- 0749-596X (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2115867364
- Cited by
- 1,405
- References
- 62
- Citations by year
- 2026: 35 · 2025: 49 · 2024: 109 · 2023: 43 · 2022: 52 · 2021: 52 · 2020: 67 · 2019: 104 · 2018: 41 · 2017: 95 · 2016: 44 · 2015: 62 · 2014: 65 · 2013: 56 · 2012: 51
- FWCI
- 19.67
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Journal of Memory and Language (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Language Development and Disorders
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Phonetics and Phonology Research
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Reading and Literacy Development
- Keywords
- word segmentation, distributional cues, transition probabilities, prosodic cues, artificial language learning, infant language acquisition, word boundary detection, statistical learning
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review