Cited by 35Neurobiology of Language and BilingualismCategorization, perception, and languageMemory Processes and Influences

Analogical Transfer of Problem Solutions within and between Languages in Spanish–English Bilinguals

Francis, Wendy S.·1999·Journal of Memory and Language

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1006/jmla.1998.2610

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Francis, W. S.
Affiliations
Stanford University (US)
Corresponding author
Francis, Wendy S.
Venue
Journal of Memory and Language
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
1999-04
Volume
40
Issue
3
Pages
301-329
ISSN
0749-596X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2142469360
Cited by
35
References
3
Citations by year
2025: 2 · 2022: 1 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 4
FWCI
0.92
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Journal of Memory and Language (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neurobiology of Language and Bilingualism
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Categorization, perception, and language
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory Processes and Influences
Keywords
analogical transfer, bilingualism, Spanish-English bilinguals, language transfer, problem solving

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review