Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 275

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Positional Specificity of Radicals in Chinese Character Recognition

Open access
Taft, Marcus, Zhu, Xiaoping, Peng, Danling·1999·Journal of Memory and Language

Abstract

The first two experiments reported here took two-radical Chinese characters and transposed their radicals to create another character. Character decision and naming responses to these transposed stimuli were then compared to control items that were not created via transposition, and no difference was found. Nor was a transposition effect found in a third experiment examining noncharacters. These results were taken to mean that positional information is crucial in activating radical information during character recognition. A further experiment did reveal a radical-transposition effect, but only when a four-radical character had two of its radicals transposed (and hence had two of its radicals intact). In contrast to the first three experiments with two-radical characters, the transposition of characters within two-character words revealed considerable interference, which confirmed the expectation that positional information is not so important in character-level representations. The results overall support a hierarchical framework for considering the recognition of Chinese words whereby there is both a radical and a character level of representation, with the former being directly activated by featural information, including positional features. © 1999 Academic Press Chinese characters have internal structure. Not only are characters composed of a series of individual strokes, but those strokes often combine to form recurring subcharacter “radicals.” Thus, the “complex” character is horizontally structured with the left radical and the right radical , while the “complex” character is vertically structured with the top radical and the bottom radical . Many of these radicals can actually be “simple” characters in their own right, like (self) and (strength). In addition, many radicals can appear in a number of different positions within a character; for

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1006/jmla.1998.2625

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 3 references

Metadata

Authors
Taft, M., Zhu, X., & Peng, D.
Venue
Journal of Memory and Language
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
1999-05
Volume
40
Issue
4
Pages
498-519
ISSN
0749-596X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2171422337
Cited by
275
References
3
FWCI
2.08
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Positional Specificity of Radicals in Chinese Character Recognition. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1006/jmla.1998.2625
The paper
Taft, M., Zhu, X., & Peng, D. (1999). Positional Specificity of Radicals in Chinese Character Recognition. Journal of Memory and Language. https://doi.org/10.1006/jmla.1998.2625

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.