The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Positional Specificity of Radicals in Chinese Character Recognition
Open accessAbstract
The first two experiments reported here took two-radical Chinese characters and transposed their radicals to create another character. Character decision and naming responses to these transposed stimuli were then compared to control items that were not created via transposition, and no difference was found. Nor was a transposition effect found in a third experiment examining noncharacters. These results were taken to mean that positional information is crucial in activating radical information during character recognition. A further experiment did reveal a radical-transposition effect, but only when a four-radical character had two of its radicals transposed (and hence had two of its radicals intact). In contrast to the first three experiments with two-radical characters, the transposition of characters within two-character words revealed considerable interference, which confirmed the expectation that positional information is not so important in character-level representations. The results overall support a hierarchical framework for considering the recognition of Chinese words whereby there is both a radical and a character level of representation, with the former being directly activated by featural information, including positional features. © 1999 Academic Press Chinese characters have internal structure. Not only are characters composed of a series of individual strokes, but those strokes often combine to form recurring subcharacter “radicals.” Thus, the “complex” character is horizontally structured with the left radical and the right radical , while the “complex” character is vertically structured with the top radical and the bottom radical . Many of these radicals can actually be “simple” characters in their own right, like (self) and (strength). In addition, many radicals can appear in a number of different positions within a character; for
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Understanding normal and impaired word reading: Computational principles in quasi-regular domains.
Plaut, D. C., McClelland, J. L., Seidenberg, M. S., & Patterson, K. (1996) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/0033-295x.103.1.56 · Cited by 2,698
The special role of rimes in the description, use, and acquisition of English orthography.
Treiman, R., Mullennix, J., Bijeljac-Babic, R., & Richmond-Welty, E. D. (1995) · Journal of Experimental Psychology: General · doi:10.1037/0096-3445.124.2.107 · Cited by 556
Lexical Retrieval and Selection Processes: Effects of Transposed-Letter Confusability
Andrews, S. (1996) · Journal of Memory and Language · doi:10.1006/jmla.1996.0040 · Cited by 200
Cited by
Amenta, S., & Crepaldi, D. (2012) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2012.00232 · Cited by 276
The Implicit and Explicit Learning of Orthographic Structure and Function of a New Writing System
Wang, M., Liu, Y., & Perfetti, C. A. (2004) · Scientific Studies of Reading · doi:10.1207/s1532799xssr0804_3 · Cited by 82
Metadata
- Authors
- Taft, M., Zhu, X., & Peng, D.
- Venue
- Journal of Memory and Language
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 1999-05
- Volume
- 40
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 498-519
- ISSN
- 0749-596X (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2171422337
- Cited by
- 275
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 2.08
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Positional Specificity of Radicals in Chinese Character Recognition. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1006/jmla.1998.2625
- The paper
- Taft, M., Zhu, X., & Peng, D. (1999). Positional Specificity of Radicals in Chinese Character Recognition. Journal of Memory and Language. https://doi.org/10.1006/jmla.1998.2625
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.