The DOI matches its Crossref record; 59 of the 59 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Agreement Processes in Sentence Comprehension
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Statistical principles in experimental design.
Winer, B. J. (1962) · McGraw-Hill Book Company · doi:10.1037/11774-000 · Cited by 26,755
ASPECTS OF THE THEORY OF SYNTAX
Chomsky, N. (1964) · doi:10.21236/ad0616323 · Cited by 13,587
Chomsky, N. (2014) · The MIT Press eBooks · doi:10.7551/mitpress/9780262527347.001.0001 · Cited by 8,244
Statistical Principles in Experimental Design
Myers, J. L., & Winer, B. J. (1964) · The American Journal of Psychology · doi:10.2307/1419292 · Cited by 8,058
Head-driven phrase structure grammar
Sag, I. A., & Pollard, C. (1994) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 3,889
A theory of reading: From eye fixations to comprehension.
Just, M. A., & Carpenter, P. A. (1980) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/0033-295x.87.4.329 · Cited by 3,887
A spreading-activation theory of retrieval in sentence production.
Dell, G. S. (1986) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037//0033-295x.93.3.283 · Cited by 3,236
The Mental Representation of Grammatical Relations
Baltin, M., & Bresnan, J. (1985) · Language · doi:10.2307/414493 · Cited by 2,783
Using confidence intervals in within-subject designs
Loftus, G. R., & Masson, M. E. J. (1994) · Psychonomic Bulletin & Review · doi:10.3758/bf03210951 · Cited by 2,448
FREQUENCY ANALYSIS OF ENGLISH USAGE: LEXICON AND GRAMMAR
Francis, W. N., Kučera, H., & Mackie, A. W. (1983) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 2,310
Cited by
The Now-or-Never bottleneck: A fundamental constraint on language
Christiansen, M. H., & Chater, N. (2016) · Behavioral and Brain Sciences · doi:10.1017/s0140525x1500031x · Cited by 733
Making Syntax of Sense: Number Agreement in Sentence Production.
Eberhard, K. M., Cutting, J. C., & Bock, K. (2005) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/0033-295x.112.3.531 · Cited by 384
Self-citationThe linguistic processes underlying the P600
Gouvea, A. C., Phillips, C., Kazanina, N., & Poeppel, D. (2010) · Language and Cognitive Processes · doi:10.1080/01690960902965951 · Cited by 344
Morphological insensitivity in second language processing
JIANG, N. (2004) · Applied Psycholinguistics · doi:10.1017/s0142716404001298 · Cited by 344
Dependency distance: A new perspective on syntactic patterns in natural languages
Liu, H., Xu, C., & Liang, J. (2017) · Physics of Life Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.plrev.2017.03.002 · Cited by 300
Metadata
- Authors
- Pearlmutter, N. J., Garnsey, S. M., & Bock, K.
- Venue
- Journal of Memory and Language
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 1999-10
- Volume
- 41
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 427-456
- ISSN
- 0749-596X (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2028994331
- Cited by
- 403
- References
- 59
- FWCI
- 1.96
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Agreement Processes in Sentence Comprehension. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1006/jmla.1999.2653
- The paper
- Pearlmutter, N. J., Garnsey, S. M., & Bock, K. (1999). Agreement Processes in Sentence Comprehension. Journal of Memory and Language. https://doi.org/10.1006/jmla.1999.2653
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.