The DOI matches its Crossref record; 56 of the 56 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Verb Argument Structure Processing: The Role of Verb-Specific and Argument-Specific Information
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The assessment and analysis of handedness: The Edinburgh inventory
Oldfield, R. C. (1971) · Neuropsychologia · doi:10.1016/0028-3932(71)90067-4 · Cited by 35,900
ASPECTS OF THE THEORY OF SYNTAX
Chomsky, N. (1964) · doi:10.21236/ad0616323 · Cited by 13,587
Thematic Proto-Roles and Argument Selection
Dowty, D. R. (1991) · Language · doi:10.1353/lan.1991.0021 · Cited by 4,480
The Mental Representation of Grammatical Relations
Baltin, M., & Bresnan, J. (1985) · Language · doi:10.2307/414493 · Cited by 2,783
Brain potentials during reading reflect word expectancy and semantic association
Kutas, M., & Hillyard, S. A. (1984) · Nature · doi:10.1038/307161a0 · Cited by 2,218
Cairns, H. S., & Gernsbacher, M. A. (1996) · Language · doi:10.2307/416113 · Cited by 1,920
Event-related brain potentials elicited by syntactic anomaly
Osterhout, L., & Holcomb, P. J. (1992) · Journal of Memory and Language · doi:10.1016/0749-596x(92)90039-z · Cited by 1,856
McCarthy, G., & Wood, C. C. (1985) · Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology/Evoked Potentials Section · doi:10.1016/0168-5597(85)90015-2 · Cited by 1,756
The Handbook of Psycholinguistics
(2017) · Wiley eBooks · doi:10.1002/9781118829516 · Cited by 1,583
The syntactic positive shift (sps) as an erp measure of syntactic processing
Hagoort, P., Brown, C., & Groothusen, J. (1993) · Language and Cognitive Processes · doi:10.1080/01690969308407585 · Cited by 1,260
Cited by
The brain basis of language processing: from structure to function.
Friederici, A. D. (2011) · Physiological Reviews · doi:10.1152/physrev.00006.2011 · Cited by 2,140
Self-citationContributions of memory circuits to language: the declarative/procedural model
Ullman, M. T. (2004) · Cognition · doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2003.10.008 · Cited by 1,893
Neural mechanisms of language comprehension: Challenges to syntax
Kuperberg, G. R. (2007) · Brain Research · doi:10.1016/j.brainres.2006.12.063 · Cited by 1,041
A neurocognitive perspective on language: The declarative/procedural model
Ullman, M. T. (2001) · Nature Reviews Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/35094573 · Cited by 997
The cortical language circuit: from auditory perception to sentence comprehension
Friederici, A. D. (2012) · Trends in Cognitive Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.tics.2012.04.001 · Cited by 748
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Friederici, A. D., & Frisch, S.
- Venue
- Journal of Memory and Language
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2000-10
- Volume
- 43
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 476-507
- ISSN
- 0749-596X (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1991464462
- Cited by
- 280
- References
- 56
- FWCI
- 3.85
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Verb Argument Structure Processing: The Role of Verb-Specific and Argument-Specific Information. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1006/jmla.2000.2709
- The paper
- Friederici, A. D., & Frisch, S. (2000). Verb Argument Structure Processing: The Role of Verb-Specific and Argument-Specific Information. Journal of Memory and Language. https://doi.org/10.1006/jmla.2000.2709
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
