The DOI matches its Crossref record; 54 of the 54 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Determinants of Wordlikeness: Phonotactics or Lexical Neighborhoods?
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Experimental Design: Procedures for the Behavioral Sciences
Kirk, R. (2013) · doi:10.4135/9781483384733 · Cited by 8,539
Experimental Design: Procedures for the Behavioral Sciences.
Addelman, S., & Kirk, R. E. (1969) · Journal of the American Statistical Association · doi:10.2307/2283497 · Cited by 5,159
A spreading-activation theory of retrieval in sentence production.
Dell, G. S. (1986) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037//0033-295x.93.3.283 · Cited by 3,236
The TRACE model of speech perception
McClelland, J. L., & Elman, J. L. (1986) · Cognitive Psychology · doi:10.1016/0010-0285(86)90015-0 · Cited by 2,956
Attention, similarity, and the identification-categorization relationship.
Nosofsky, R. M. (1986) · Journal of Experimental Psychology General · doi:10.1037//0096-3445.115.1.39 · Cited by 2,766
Toward a Universal Law of Generalization for Psychological Science
Shepard, R. N. (1987) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.3629243 · Cited by 2,416
Recognizing Spoken Words: The Neighborhood Activation Model
Luce, P. A., & Pisoni, D. B. (1998) · Ear and Hearing · doi:10.1097/00003446-199802000-00001 · Cited by 1,939
Regular morphology and the lexicon
Bybee, J. (1995) · Language and Cognitive Processes · doi:10.1080/01690969508407111 · Cited by 1,541
Processing interactions and lexical access during word recognition in continuous speech
Marslen-Wilson, W. D., & Welsh, A. (1978) · Cognitive Psychology · doi:10.1016/0010-0285(78)90018-x · Cited by 1,426
Shortlist: a connectionist model of continuous speech recognition
Norris, D. (1994) · Cognition · doi:10.1016/0010-0277(94)90043-4 · Cited by 1,250
Cited by
Bybee, J. (2010) · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511750526 · Cited by 3,488
Automated Text Analysis for Consumer Research
Humphreys, A., & Wang, R. J.-H. (2018) · Journal of Consumer Research · doi:10.1093/jcr/ucx104 · Cited by 636
Analytic bias and phonological typology
Moreton, E. (2008) · Phonology · doi:10.1017/s0952675708001413 · Cited by 431
A Usage-Based Approach to Spanish Verbs of ‘Becoming‘
Bybee, J., & Eddington, D. (2006) · Language · doi:10.1353/lan.2006.0081 · Cited by 405
Wilson, C. (2006) · Cognitive Science · doi:10.1207/s15516709cog0000_89 · Cited by 398
Metadata
- Authors
- Bailey, T. M., & Hahn, U.
- Venue
- Journal of Memory and Language
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2001-05
- Volume
- 44
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 568-591
- ISSN
- 0749-596X (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2108962772
- Cited by
- 419
- References
- 54
- FWCI
- 17.13
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Determinants of Wordlikeness: Phonotactics or Lexical Neighborhoods? https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1006/jmla.2000.2756
- The paper
- Bailey, T. M., & Hahn, U. (2001). Determinants of Wordlikeness: Phonotactics or Lexical Neighborhoods? Journal of Memory and Language. https://doi.org/10.1006/jmla.2000.2756
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
