The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Dead-Time Free Measurement of Dipole–Dipole Interactions between Electron Spins
Open accessAbstract
A four-pulse version of the pulse double electron-electron resonance (DEER) experiment is presented, which is designed for the determination of interradical distances on a nanoscopic length-scale. With the new pulse sequence electron-electron couplings can be studied without dead-time artifacts, so that even broad distributions of electron-electron distances can be characterized. A version of the experiment that uses a pulse train in the detection period exhibits improved signal-to-noise ratio. Tests on two nitroxide biradicals with known length indicate that the accessible range of distances extends from about 1.5 to 8 nm. The four-pulse DEER spectra of an ionic spin probe in an ionomer exhibit features due to probe molecules situated both on the same and on different ion clusters. The former feature provides information on the cluster size and is inaccessible with previous methods.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
DeerAnalysis2006—a comprehensive software package for analyzing pulsed ELDOR data
Jeschke, G., Chechik, V., Ionita, P., Godt, A., Zimmermann, H., Banham, J., Timmel, C. R., Hilger, D., & Jung, H. (2006) · Applied Magnetic Resonance · doi:10.1007/bf03166213 · Cited by 1,050
Self-citationDeep neural network processing of DEER data
Worswick, S. G., Spencer, J. A., Jeschke, G., & Kuprov, I. (2018) · Science Advances · doi:10.1126/sciadv.aat5218 · Cited by 212
Self-citationCatalytic Contributions from Remote Regions of Enzyme Structure
Lee, J., & Goodey, N. M. (2011) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/cr100042n · Cited by 116
An embedded lipid in the multidrug transporter LmrP suggests a mechanism for polyspecificity
Debruycker, V., Hutchin, A., Masureel, M., Ficici, E., Martens, C., Legrand, P., Stein, R. A., Mchaourab, H. S., Faraldo-Gómez, J. D., Remaut, H., et al. (2020) · Nature Structural & Molecular Biology · doi:10.1038/s41594-020-0464-y · Cited by 69
Organization of the Mitochondrial Apoptotic BAK Pore
Aluvila, S., Mandal, T., Hustedt, E., Fajer, P., Choe, J. Y., & Oh, K. J. (2014) · Journal of Biological Chemistry · doi:10.1074/jbc.m113.526806 · Cited by 71
Metadata
- Authors
- Pannier, M., Veit, S., Godt, A., Jeschke, G., & Spiess, H. W.
- Venue
- Journal of Magnetic Resonance
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2000-02
- Volume
- 142
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 331-340
- ISSN
- 1090-7807 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2026516359
- Cited by
- 1,056
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 6.96
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Dead-Time Free Measurement of Dipole–Dipole Interactions between Electron Spins. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1006/jmre.1999.1944
- The paper
- Pannier, M., Veit, S., Godt, A., Jeschke, G., & Spiess, H. W. (2000). Dead-Time Free Measurement of Dipole–Dipole Interactions between Electron Spins. Journal of Magnetic Resonance. https://doi.org/10.1006/jmre.1999.1944
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
