Evaluating fishery impacts using metrics of community structure
Abstract
Evaluation of the ecosystem effects of fishing presupposes that it is possible to measure the state of an ecosystem, detect differences among measures of its state, and determine if the differences are due to chance or impacts of fishing. Ecologists have developed or adopted four main classes of community/ecosystem metrics for such tasks: diversity and similarity indices, ordination methods, metrics of aggregate community properties, and metrics derived from ecosystem models. Each class is explained briefly, and guidance is given to the literature. Size spectra, k-dominance curves, and multi-dimensional scaling emerge as promising methods for these uses. Some modelling frameworks also may be useful, but more work is needed on sensitivity testing and development of independent theory for these models. The current theoretical basis for most ecosystem models assumes that competition structures the system being modelled. Problems with applying that framework to exploited marine systems are reviewed. Resampling methods are essential when testing for differences among community metrics. Practices for determining causality when ecosystem metrics change are reviewed, and additional knowledge and data necessary to link change to cause are highlighted.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Given its distinct annual and spatial trends in Chesapeake Bay and emphasis on biomass-dominant species, total fish CPUE (as an index of demersal fish biomass) appears to be a useful ecosystem indicator.
“Given its distinct annual and spatial trends in Chesapeake Bay and emphasis on biomass-dominant species, total fish CPUE (as an index of demersal fish biomass) appears to be a useful ecosystem indicator as suggested by many authors in other systems (e.g.Rice 2000, Methratta & Link 2006).”
From Patterns and drivers of the demersal fish community of Chesapeake Bay (2013) · cites this paper as Rice 2000
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Patterns and drivers of the demersal fish community of Chesapeake Bay
Buchheister, A., Bonzek, C., Gartland, J., & Latour, R. (2013) · Marine Ecology Progress Series · doi:10.3354/meps10253 · Cited by 66 · see citing works
- Authors
- Rice, J.
- Affiliations
- Fisheries and Oceans Canada (CA)
- Corresponding author
- Rice, J
- ORCID
- Rice, J
- Venue
- ICES Journal of Marine Science
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2000-06
- Volume
- 57
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 682-688
- ISSN
- 1054-3139 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2131343358
- Cited by
- 195
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 8 · 2015: 11 · 2014: 11 · 2013: 9 · 2012: 9
- FWCI
- 7.40
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- ICES Journal of Marine Science (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- University of Warwick
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Marine and fisheries research
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Nature and Landscape Conservation › Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies
- Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Oceanography › Marine Biology and Ecology Research
- Keywords
- fisheries impacts, ecosystem effects of fishing, ordination methods, size spectra, multidimensional scaling, ecosystem models, competition (biology), resampling, causality testing, marine ecosystems, fisheries impact assessment
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review