The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Nitric Oxide Regulates Wound Healing
Open accessAbstract
Nitric oxide (NO) synthesis occurs during wound healing, but its role has not been defined. To study the effect of NO on wound repair, S-methyl isothiouronium (MITU, a competitive inhibitor of NO synthase) was administered at a dose of 10, 50, and 100 mg/kg body weight/day, using intraperitoneally implanted miniosmotic pumps. Groups of 10 male Balb/C mice underwent a dorsal skin incision and polyvinyl alcohol sponges were inserted subcutaneously. The animals were sacrificed 10 days postwounding and wound breaking strength and hydroxyproline content of sponges, an index of reparative collagen deposition, were determined. Some sponges were used to harvest wound fluid and infiltrating cells, which were then incubated overnight with or without 1 mM MITU. Nitrite and nitrate, stable end products of NO, were measured in wound fluid and in wound cell culture supernatants. Continuous intraperitoneal infusion of MITU significantly decreased wound fluid nitrite/nitrate concentrations in a dose dependent manner (P < 0.01). Inhibition of wound NO synthesis by 100 mg MITU/kg/day was paralleled by lowered wound collagen accumulation (P < 0.01) and wound breaking strength (P < 0.01). In vitro NO synthesis by wound cells obtained from animals treated with 100 mg MITU/kg/day was not significantly different from controls (12.6 +/- 1.2 vs 10.7 +/- 0.6 nmole NO2 + NO3/microgram DNA), reflecting the reversible inhibition of NO synthase by MITU. However, NO production was equally inhibited in wound infiltrating cells by the in vitro addition of MITU (83% vs 85%, respectively). These data suggest that nitric oxide synthesis is critical to wound collagen accumulation and acquisition of mechanical strength.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Role of nitric oxide in wound repair
Witte, M. B., & Barbul, A. (2002) · The American Journal of Surgery · doi:10.1016/s0002-9610(02)00815-2 · Cited by 556
Self-citationWound healing: Biologic features and approaches to maximize healing trajectories
Robson, M. C., Steed, D. L., & Franz, M. G. (2001) · Current Problems in Surgery · doi:10.1067/msg.2001.111167 · Cited by 503
Nitric oxide and wound repair: role of cytokines?
Schwentker, A., Vodovotz, Y., Weller, R., & Billiar, T. R. (2002) · Nitric Oxide · doi:10.1016/s1089-8603(02)00002-2 · Cited by 386
Impaired wound healing and angiogenesis in eNOS-deficient mice
Lee, P. C., Salyapongse, A. N., Bragdon, G. A., Shears, L. L., Watkins, S. C., Edington, H. D. J., & Billiar, T. R. (1999) · American Journal of Physiology-Heart and Circulatory Physiology · doi:10.1152/ajpheart.1999.277.4.h1600 · Cited by 369
Redox signals in wound healing
Sen, C. K., & Roy, S. (2008) · Biochimica et Biophysica Acta (BBA) - General Subjects · doi:10.1016/j.bbagen.2008.01.006 · Cited by 349
Metadata
- Authors
- Schäffer, M. R., Tantry, U., Gross, S. S., Wasserkrug, H. L., & Barbul, A.
- Venue
- Journal of Surgical Research
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 1996-06
- Volume
- 63
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 237-240
- ISSN
- 0022-4804 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2073973931
- Cited by
- 279
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 12.07
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Nitric Oxide Regulates Wound Healing. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1006/jsre.1996.0254
- The paper
- Schäffer, M. R., Tantry, U., Gross, S. S., Wasserkrug, H. L., & Barbul, A. (1996). Nitric Oxide Regulates Wound Healing. Journal of Surgical Research. https://doi.org/10.1006/jsre.1996.0254
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.