The DOI matches its Crossref record.
A Model For the Lowering of Plant Ethylene Concentrations by Plant Growth-promoting Bacteria
Abstract
It was previously shown that a number of plant growth promoting rhizobacteria contain an enzyme, 1-aminocyclopropane-1-carboxylate deaminase, that catalyses the cleavage of 1-aminocyclopropane-1-carboxylate, the immediate precursor of ethylene in plants. Moreover, experimental evidence indicated that the activity of this enzyme was the key factor in the ability of plant growth promoting rhizobacteria to stimulate the elongation of plant roots. In the model presented in this manuscript we address the question of how the bacterial enzyme 1-aminocyclopropane-1-carboxylate deaminase, with a low affinity for 1-aminocyclopropane-1-carboxylate, can effectively compete with the plant enzyme 1-aminocyclopropane-1-carboxylate oxidase, which has a high affinity for the same substrate, 1-aminocyclopropane-1-carboxylate, with the result that the plant's endogenous ethylene concentration is reduced. It is argued that the simplest explanation for the observed biological activity of plant growth promoting rhizobacteria relates to the relative amounts of 1-aminocyclopropane-1-carboxylate deaminase and 1-aminocyclopropane-1-carboxylate oxidase in the system under consideration. For plant growth promoting rhizobacteria to be able to lower plant ethylene levels, the 1-aminocyclopropane-1-carboxylate deaminase level should be at least 100- to 1000-fold greater then the 1-aminocyclopropane-1-carboxylate oxidase level. This is likely to be the case, provided that the expression of 1-aminocyclopropane-1-carboxylate oxidase has not been induced.Copyright 1998 Academic Press Limited Copyright 1998 Academic Press Limited
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“ACC-deaminase activity lowers the levels of stress ethylene improving plant growth in stress conditions (Glick et al., 1998;Contesto et al., 2008;Tsuchisaka et al., 2009;Bulgarelli et al., 2013).”
From Intensify production, transform biomass to energy and novel goods and protect soils in Europe—A vision how to mobilize marginal lands (2018) · cites this paper as Glick et al., 1998
In the citing paper
“Microbial production of auxins (indole-3-acetic acid (IAA)) stimulates plant cell proliferation and elongation, resulting in higher total root surface and more efficient water and nutrient uptake (Glick et al., 1998;Patten and Glick, 2002;Spaepen et al., 2008).”
From Intensify production, transform biomass to energy and novel goods and protect soils in Europe—A vision how to mobilize marginal lands (2018) · cites this paper as Glick et al., 1998
Citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Plant Growth-Promoting Bacteria: Mechanisms and Applications
Glick, B. R. (2012) · Scientifica · doi:10.6064/2012/963401 · Cited by 3,346
“In addition, a model was formulated wherein the role of this enzyme in the facilitation of plant growth by PGPB was elaborated [98].”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialSelf-citationStructure and functions of the bacterial microbiota of plants
Bulgarelli, D., Schlaeppi, K., Spaepen, S., van Themaat, E. V. L., & Schulze-Lefert, P. (2013) · Annual Review of Plant Biology · doi:10.1146/annurev-arplant-050312-120106 · Cited by 3,308
Plant growth promoting rhizobacteria as biofertilizers
Vessey, J. K. (2003) · Plant and Soil · doi:10.1023/a:1026037216893 · Cited by 3,397
Phosphate solubilizing bacteria and their role in plant growth promotion
Rodrı́guez, H., & Fraga, R. (1999) · Biotechnology Advances · doi:10.1016/s0734-9750(99)00014-2 · Cited by 3,050
“Direct growth promotion can be through the synthesis of phytohormones [20], N 2 fixation [21], reduction of membrane potential of the roots [22], synthesis of some enzymes (such as ACC deaminase) that modulate the level of plant hormones [23], as well as the solubilization of inorganic phosphate and mineralization of…”
BackgroundHardoim, P. R., van Overbeek, L. S., Berg, G., Pirttilä, A. M., Compant, S., Campisano, A., Döring, M., & Sessitsch, A. (2015) · Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews · doi:10.1128/mmbr.00050-14 · Cited by 2,861
“This enzyme is responsible for lowering the levels of ethylene in the plant by cleaving the plant-produced ethylene precursor 1-aminocyclopropane-1-carboxylate (ACC) to ammonia and 2-oxobutanoate, preventing ethylene signaling (207).”
Background
Metadata
- Authors
- Glick, B. R., Penrose, D. M., & Li, J.
- Affiliations
- University of Waterloo (CA)
- Corresponding author
- Glick, Bernard R.
- Venue
- Journal of Theoretical Biology
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 1998-01
- Volume
- 190
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 63-68
- ISSN
- 0022-5193 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1999970316
- Cited by
- 1,466
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 17 · 2025: 33 · 2024: 58 · 2023: 72 · 2022: 78 · 2021: 99 · 2020: 90 · 2019: 97 · 2018: 69 · 2017: 69 · 2016: 71 · 2015: 62 · 2014: 70 · 2013: 91 · 2012: 66
- FWCI
- 11.12
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of Theoretical Biology (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Plant-Microbe Interactions and Immunity
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Polyamine Metabolism and Applications
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Postharvest Quality and Shelf Life Management
- Keywords
- plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria, ethylene production, ACC deaminase, ACC oxidase, enzyme kinetics, enzyme competition, root elongation, enzyme expression
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review