The DOI matches its Crossref record.
A Model For the Lowering of Plant Ethylene Concentrations by Plant Growth-promoting Bacteria
Abstract
It was previously shown that a number of plant growth promoting rhizobacteria contain an enzyme, 1-aminocyclopropane-1-carboxylate deaminase, that catalyses the cleavage of 1-aminocyclopropane-1-carboxylate, the immediate precursor of ethylene in plants. Moreover, experimental evidence indicated that the activity of this enzyme was the key factor in the ability of plant growth promoting rhizobacteria to stimulate the elongation of plant roots. In the model presented in this manuscript we address the question of how the bacterial enzyme 1-aminocyclopropane-1-carboxylate deaminase, with a low affinity for 1-aminocyclopropane-1-carboxylate, can effectively compete with the plant enzyme 1-aminocyclopropane-1-carboxylate oxidase, which has a high affinity for the same substrate, 1-aminocyclopropane-1-carboxylate, with the result that the plant's endogenous ethylene concentration is reduced. It is argued that the simplest explanation for the observed biological activity of plant growth promoting rhizobacteria relates to the relative amounts of 1-aminocyclopropane-1-carboxylate deaminase and 1-aminocyclopropane-1-carboxylate oxidase in the system under consideration. For plant growth promoting rhizobacteria to be able to lower plant ethylene levels, the 1-aminocyclopropane-1-carboxylate deaminase level should be at least 100- to 1000-fold greater then the 1-aminocyclopropane-1-carboxylate oxidase level. This is likely to be the case, provided that the expression of 1-aminocyclopropane-1-carboxylate oxidase has not been induced.Copyright 1998 Academic Press Limited Copyright 1998 Academic Press Limited
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“ACC-deaminase activity lowers the levels of stress ethylene improving plant growth in stress conditions (Glick et al., 1998;Contesto et al., 2008;Tsuchisaka et al., 2009;Bulgarelli et al., 2013).”
From Intensify production, transform biomass to energy and novel goods and protect soils in Europe—A vision how to mobilize marginal lands (2018) · cites this paper as Glick et al., 1998
In the citing paper
“Microbial production of auxins (indole-3-acetic acid (IAA)) stimulates plant cell proliferation and elongation, resulting in higher total root surface and more efficient water and nutrient uptake (Glick et al., 1998;Patten and Glick, 2002;Spaepen et al., 2008).”
From Intensify production, transform biomass to energy and novel goods and protect soils in Europe—A vision how to mobilize marginal lands (2018) · cites this paper as Glick et al., 1998
Citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Plant Growth-Promoting Bacteria: Mechanisms and Applications
Glick, B. R. (2012) · Scientifica · doi:10.6064/2012/963401 · Cited by 3,346
“In addition, a model was formulated wherein the role of this enzyme in the facilitation of plant growth by PGPB was elaborated [98].”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialSelf-citationStructure and functions of the bacterial microbiota of plants
Bulgarelli, D., Schlaeppi, K., Spaepen, S., van Themaat, E. V. L., & Schulze-Lefert, P. (2013) · Annual Review of Plant Biology · doi:10.1146/annurev-arplant-050312-120106 · Cited by 3,308
Plant growth promoting rhizobacteria as biofertilizers
Vessey, J. K. (2003) · Plant and Soil · doi:10.1023/a:1026037216893 · Cited by 3,397
Phosphate solubilizing bacteria and their role in plant growth promotion
Rodrı́guez, H., & Fraga, R. (1999) · Biotechnology Advances · doi:10.1016/s0734-9750(99)00014-2 · Cited by 3,050
“Direct growth promotion can be through the synthesis of phytohormones [20], N 2 fixation [21], reduction of membrane potential of the roots [22], synthesis of some enzymes (such as ACC deaminase) that modulate the level of plant hormones [23], as well as the solubilization of inorganic phosphate and mineralization of…”
BackgroundHardoim, P. R., van Overbeek, L. S., Berg, G., Pirttilä, A. M., Compant, S., Campisano, A., Döring, M., & Sessitsch, A. (2015) · Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews · doi:10.1128/mmbr.00050-14 · Cited by 2,861
“This enzyme is responsible for lowering the levels of ethylene in the plant by cleaving the plant-produced ethylene precursor 1-aminocyclopropane-1-carboxylate (ACC) to ammonia and 2-oxobutanoate, preventing ethylene signaling (207).”
BackgroundCompant, S., Duffy, B., Nowak, J., Clément, C., & Barka, E. A. (2005) · Applied and Environmental Microbiology · doi:10.1128/aem.71.9.4951-4959.2005 · Cited by 2,640
“For example, transforming the 1-aminocyclopropane-1-carboxylic acid deaminase gene, which directly stimulates plant growth by cleaving the immediate precursor of plant ethylene (64) into P.”
BackgroundAgricultural uses of plant biostimulants
Calvo, P., Nelson, L. M., & Kloepper, J. W. (2014) · Plant and Soil · doi:10.1007/s11104-014-2131-8 · Cited by 2,561
“As a result, ACC levels in the plant are lowered and the ET content is reduced (Glick et al. 1998).”
BackgroundBacteria with ACC deaminase can promote plant growth and help to feed the world
Glick, B. R. (2013) · Microbiological Research · doi:10.1016/j.micres.2013.09.009 · Cited by 2,222
“…IAA promotes plant rowth per se (Patten and Glick 2002), (ii) ACC deaminase prevents tress ethylene from becoming overly inhibitory of plant growth Glick et al. 1998) and (iii) siderophores help the plants to acquire ufficient iron in the presence of overwhelming amounts of other potentially…”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialSelf-citationSoil beneficial bacteria and their role in plant growth promotion: a review
Hayat, R., Ali, S., Amara, U., Khalid, R., & Ahmed, I. (2010) · Annals of Microbiology · doi:10.1007/s13213-010-0117-1 · Cited by 2,064
“In this way, the bacterium acts as a sink for ACC and thus lowers ethylene level in plants, preventing some of the potentially deleterious consequences of high ethylene concentrations (Glick et al. 1998; Steenhooudt and Vanderleyden 2000; Saleem et al. 2007).”
BackgroundIndole-3-acetic acid in microbial and microorganism-plant signaling
Spaepen, S., Vanderleyden, J., & Remans, R. (2007) · FEMS Microbiology Reviews · doi:10.1111/j.1574-6976.2007.00072.x · Cited by 1,954
“Ethylene is an inhibitor of root growth especially reducing the primary root length (Glick et al., 1998; Glick, 2005 ).”
BackgroundRole of Pseudomonas putida Indoleacetic Acid in Development of the Host Plant Root System
Patten, C. L., & Glick, B. R. (2002) · Applied and Environmental Microbiology · doi:10.1128/aem.68.8.3795-3801.2002 · Cited by 1,871
“putida GR12-2 to enhance plant growth include the capacity to synthesize siderophores and thereby provide iron for the plant (7), the capacity to lower growth-inhibiting levels of ethylene in plant tissues by production of 1-aminocyclopropane-1-carboxylic acid (ACC) deaminase (16, 21), and the capacity to secrete IAA…”
BackgroundSelf-citationPlant growth-promoting bacterial endophytes
Santoyo, G., Moreno‐Hagelsieb, G., Orozco-Mosqueda, M. D. C., & Glick, B. R. (2015) · Microbiological Research · doi:10.1016/j.micres.2015.11.008 · Cited by 1,789
Self-citationProperties of bacterial endophytes and their proposed role in plant growth
Hardoim, P. R., van Overbeek, L. S., & van Elsas, J. D. (2008) · Trends in Microbiology · doi:10.1016/j.tim.2008.07.008 · Cited by 1,711
Penrose, D. M., & Glick, B. R. (2003) · Physiologia Plantarum · doi:10.1034/j.1399-3054.2003.00086.x · Cited by 1,597
“A number of PGPR contain the enzyme 1-aminocyclopropane-1-carboxylate (ACC) deaminase (Jacobson et al. 1994, Shah et al. 1997, Glick et al. 1998, Shah et al. 1998) and this enzyme can cleave the plant ethylene precursor ACC, and thereby lower the level of ethylene in a developing or stressed plant.”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialSelf-citationSarwar, N., Imran, M., Shaheen, M. R., Ishaque, W., Kamran, M., Matloob, A., Rehim, A., & Hussain, S. (2016) · Chemosphere · doi:10.1016/j.chemosphere.2016.12.116 · Cited by 1,442
“These bacteria may increase 398 plant growth by various mechanisms like reduction in ethylene production under stress, nitrogen 399 fixation and specific enzyme activity (Glick et al., 1998).”
BackgroundDixit, R., Wasiullah, Malaviya, D., Pandiyan, K., Singh, U. B., Sahu, A., Shukla, R., Singh, B., Rai, J., Sharma, P. K., et al. (2015) · Sustainability · doi:10.3390/su7022189 · Cited by 1,423
“impair root development and to facilitate the generation of larger roots which enhance seedling survival [108].”
BackgroundPlant phenolics: Recent advances on their biosynthesis, genetics, and ecophysiology
Cheynier, V., Comte, G., Davies, K. M., Lattanzio, V., & Martens, S. (2013) · Plant Physiology and Biochemistry · doi:10.1016/j.plaphy.2013.05.009 · Cited by 1,367
Plant growth-promoting bacteria confer resistance in tomato plants to salt stress
Mayak, S., Tirosh, T., & Glick, B. R. (2004) · Plant Physiology and Biochemistry · doi:10.1016/j.plaphy.2004.05.009 · Cited by 1,257
Self-citationBhardwaj, D., Ansari, M. W., Sahoo, R. K., & Tuteja, N. K. (2014) · Microbial Cell Factories · doi:10.1186/1475-2859-13-66 · Cited by 1,284
“[120] that PGPR could enhance the growth of plant by suppressing the expression of ethylene.”
BackgroundAuxin and Plant-Microbe InteractionsPreprint
Spaepen, S., & Vanderleyden, J. (2010) · Cold Spring Harbor Perspectives in Biology · doi:10.1101/cshperspect.a001438 · Cited by 1,225
“This enzyme converts ACC (the precursor of the stress hormone ethylene) in a-ketobutyrate and ammonia, lowering the ethylene level (inhibitor of root growth) inside the plant because of lack of precursor (Glick et al. 1998; Glick 2005).”
BackgroundHeavy Metal Polluted Soils: Effect on Plants and Bioremediation Methods
Chibuike, G. U., & Obiora, S. C. (2014) · Applied and Environmental Soil Science · doi:10.1155/2014/752708 · Cited by 1,164
“production of phytohormones and supply of nutrients [138], production of siderophores and other chelating agents [139], specific enzyme activity and N fixation [140], and reduction in ethylene production which encourages root growth [141].”
BackgroundMa, Y., Prasad, M. N. V., Rajkumar, M., & Freitas, H. M. D. O. (2010) · Biotechnology Advances · doi:10.1016/j.biotechadv.2010.12.001 · Cited by 1,155
“The bacteria utilize the ammonia evolved from ACC as a sole nitrogen source and thereby decrease ACC within the plant (Penrose and Glick, 2001) with the concomitant reduction of plant ethylene (Glick et al., 1998; Belimov et al., 2002).”
BackgroundNadeem, S. M., Ahmad, M., Zahir, Z. A., Javaid, A., & Ashraf, M. (2014) · Biotechnology Advances · doi:10.1016/j.biotechadv.2013.12.005 · Cited by 1,088
Root exudates mediated interactions belowground
Haichar, F. E. Z., Santaella, C., Heulin, T., & Achouak, W. (2014) · Soil Biology and Biochemistry · doi:10.1016/j.soilbio.2014.06.017 · Cited by 1,023
Gray, E. J., & Smith, D. L. (2004) · Soil Biology and Biochemistry · doi:10.1016/j.soilbio.2004.08.030 · Cited by 1,043
Phytoremediation and rhizoremediation of organic soil contaminants: Potential and challenges
Gerhardt, K. E., Huang, X.-D., Glick, B. R., & Greenberg, B. M. (2008) · Plant Science · doi:10.1016/j.plantsci.2008.09.014 · Cited by 961
Self-citationPlant-rhizobacteria interactions alleviate abiotic stress conditions
DIMKPA, C., WEINAND, T., & ASCH, F. (2009) · Plant, Cell & Environment · doi:10.1111/j.1365-3040.2009.02028.x · Cited by 963
Plant growth-promoting bacteria that confer resistance to water stress in tomatoes and peppers
Mayak, S., Tirosh, T., & Glick, B. R. (2003) · Plant Science · doi:10.1016/j.plantsci.2003.10.025 · Cited by 954
“Plant growth-promoting bacteria are free-living soil bacteria that can either directly or indirectly facilitate the growth of plants[2,3].”
BackgroundInfluentialSelf-citationPromotion of plant growth by ACC deaminase-producing soil bacteria
Glick, B. R., Cheng, Z., Czarny, J., et al. (2007) · European Journal of Plant Pathology · doi:10.1007/s10658-007-9162-4 · Cited by 909
Self-citationPromotion of Plant Growth by Bacterial ACC Deaminase
Glick, B. R., Todorovic, B., Czarny, J., Cheng, Z., Duan, J., & McConkey, B. J. (2007) · Critical Reviews in Plant Sciences · doi:10.1080/07352680701572966 · Cited by 894
“…it has been found that a number of plant growth-promoting bacteria contain the enzyme ACC deaminase (Klee and Kishore, 1992; Jacobson et al., 1994; Glick et al., 1995, 1998; Burd et al., 1998; Kaneko et al., 2000; Belimov et al., 2001, 2005; Kaneko et al., 2002; Babalola et al., 2003; Ma et al.,…”
BackgroundMethodSelf-citationSingh, J. S., Pandey, V. C., & Singh, D. P. (2011) · Agriculture Ecosystems & Environment · doi:10.1016/j.agee.2011.01.017 · Cited by 890
Plant growth-promoting bacteria that decrease heavy metal toxicity in plants
Burd, G. I., Dixon, D. G., & Glick, B. R. (2000) · Canadian Journal of Microbiology · doi:10.1139/w99-143 · Cited by 903
Self-citationModulation of plant ethylene levels by the bacterial enzyme ACC deaminase
Glick, B. R. (2005) · FEMS Microbiology Letters · doi:10.1016/j.femsle.2005.07.030 · Cited by 895
“This data is consistent with the model [13] of how deaminase-containing plant growth-promoting bacteria lower plant ethylene levels and limit stress-caused damage to plants.”
BackgroundResultSelf-citationBelimov, A. A., Hontzeas, N., Сафронова, В. И., Demchinskaya, S. V., Piluzza, G., Bullitta, S., & Glick, B. R. (2004) · Soil Biology and Biochemistry · doi:10.1016/j.soilbio.2004.07.033 · Cited by 850
“The results obtained here confirm previous conclusions about the importance of bacterial ACC deaminase in plant growth promotion (Glick et al., 1998), and expanded our knowledge of bacterial metabolism of ACC, since this is the first report showing utilization of ACC by bacteria as an energy source.”
ResultSelf-citationPhytoremediation: synergistic use of plants and bacteria to clean up the environment
Glick, B. R. (2003) · Biotechnology Advances · doi:10.1016/s0734-9750(03)00055-7 · Cited by 793
“…detected in the fungus, Penicillium citrinum (Honma, 1993), and in a number of bacterial strains (Klee and Kishore, 1992; Jacobson et al., 1994; Glick et al., 1995; Campbell and Thomson, 1996; Burd et al., 1998; Belimov et al., 2001; Ghosh et al., 2003; Ma et al., 2003) and in the yeast,…”
BackgroundSelf-citationDey, R., Pal, K. K., Bhatt, D. M., & Chauhan, S. (2004) · Microbiological Research · doi:10.1016/j.micres.2004.08.004 · Cited by 791
Salt stress in maize: effects, resistance mechanisms, and management. A review
Farooq, M., Hussain, M., Wakeel, A., & Siddique, K. H. M. (2015) · Agronomy for Sustainable Development · doi:10.1007/s13593-015-0287-0 · Cited by 787
“By reducing ethylene and facilitating the formation of longer roots, these bacteria may enhance seedling survival during the first few days after sowing (Glick et al. 1998).”
BackgroundEndophytic Bacteria and Their Potential Applications
Lodewyckx, C., Vangronsveld, J., Porteous, F., Moore, E. R. B., Taghavi, S., Mezgeay, M., & van der Lelie, D. (2002) · Critical Reviews in Plant Sciences · doi:10.1080/0735-260291044377 · Cited by 785
“It was hypothesized that this enzyme, which has no known function in bacteria, might be part of a mechanism used by certain bacteria to stimulate plant growth (Glick et al., 1998).”
BackgroundUnderstanding and exploiting plant beneficial microbes
Finkel, O. M., Castrillo, G., Paredes, S. H., Salas-González, I., & Dangl, J. L. (2017) · Current Opinion in Plant Biology · doi:10.1016/j.pbi.2017.04.018 · Cited by 749
“Pre-screening strategies include in vitro screening for known PGP-related activities such as 1-aminocyclopropane-1-carboxylate (ACC) deaminase [31], phosphate solubilization [32], nitrogen fixation [33], or enhancement of plant immune system function [34,35 ,36].”
The rhizosphere as a reservoir for opportunistic human pathogenic bacteria
Berg, G., Eberl, L., & Hartmann, A. (2005) · Environmental Microbiology · doi:10.1111/j.1462-2920.2005.00891.x · Cited by 716
“An interesting phenomenon is the enhancement of stress tolerance by lowering the ethylene level (Glick, 1998).”
BackgroundDoornbos, R. F., van Loon, L. C., & Bakker, P. A. H. M. (2011) · Agronomy for Sustainable Development · doi:10.1007/s13593-011-0028-y · Cited by 723
“Glick et al. (1998) postulate that plants release ACC into the rhizosphere, and that this ACC is hydrolyzed by the bacterial ACC deaminase, thereby reducing ET-mediated suppression of root growth.”
BackgroundMECHANISMS AND PRACTICAL CONSIDERATIONS INVOLVED IN PLANT GROWTH PROMOTION BY RHIZOBACTERIA
Martínez-Viveros, Ó., Jorquera, M. A., Crowley, D. E., Gajardo, G., & Mora, M. D. L. L. (2010) · Journal of soil science and plant nutrition · doi:10.4067/s0718-95162010000100006 · Cited by 691
“The ACC deaminase acts on ACC, an immediate ethylene precursor in higher plants, degrading this chemical to alphaketobutyrate and ammonium, (Glick et al., 1998; Grichko and Glick, 2001; Mayak et al., 2004).”
BackgroundInfluentialSaleem, M., Arshad, M., Hussain, S., & Bhatti, A. S. (2007) · Journal of Industrial Microbiology & Biotechnology · doi:10.1007/s10295-007-0240-6 · Cited by 653
Gravel, V., Antoun, H., & Tweddell, R. (2007) · Soil Biology and Biochemistry · doi:10.1016/j.soilbio.2007.02.015 · Cited by 665
“This reduction in the level of ACC in the rhizosphere increases the exudation of ACC by the plant to maintain equilibrium, reducing the potential synthesis of ethylene since ACC is the immediate precursor of this compound in the plant (Glick et al., 1998).”
BackgroundFahad, S., Hussain, S., Bano, A., Saud, S., Hassan, S., Shan, D., Khan, F. A., Khan, F. S. A., Chen, Y., Wu, C., et al. (2014) · Environmental Science and Pollution Research · doi:10.1007/s11356-014-3754-2 · Cited by 652
“Therefore, PGPR in developing or stressed plants could decrease the levels of ethylene, enhance the life of seedlings, and help the plant in the formation of longer roots (Glick et al. 1998).”
BackgroundTaghavi, S., Garafola, C., Monchy, S., Newman, L., Hoffman, A., Weyens, N., Barac, T., Vangronsveld, J., & van der Lelie, D. (2008) · Applied and Environmental Microbiology · doi:10.1128/aem.02239-08 · Cited by 625
“The 2,3-butanediol dehydrogenase ButB (15) involved in the conversion of acetoin into 2,3-butanediol was not found encoded on the genomes of the endophytic bacteria but is present on the poplar genome.”
BackgroundMarques, A. P. G. C., Rangel, A. O. S. S., & Castro, P. M. L. (2009) · Critical Reviews in Environmental Science and Technology · doi:10.1080/10643380701798272 · Cited by 614
“…such as reduction of ethylene production (thus allowing plants to develop longer roots and better establish during early stages of growth; see Glick et al., 1998), nitrogen fixation, specific enzymatic activity (Khan, 2005), supply of bioavailable phosphorous and other trace elements for…”
BackgroundRole of plant growth promoting rhizobacteria in the remediation of metal contaminated soils
Khan, M. S., Zaidi, A., Wani, P. A., & Oves, M. (2008) · Environmental Chemistry Letters · doi:10.1007/s10311-008-0155-0 · Cited by 587
“123 on plants ( Glick et al. 2002 ). The ACC of roots is metabolized by ACC deaminase to ketobutyrate and ammonia (Penrose and Glick 2001).”
BackgroundScreening for Plant Growth–Promoting Rhizobacteria to Promote Early Soybean Growth
Cattelan, A. M., Hartel, P. G., & Fuhrmann, J. J. (1999) · Soil Science Society of America Journal · doi:10.2136/sssaj1999.6361670x · Cited by 585
Ali, S., Charles, T. C., & Glick, B. R. (2014) · Plant Physiology and Biochemistry · doi:10.1016/j.plaphy.2014.04.003 · Cited by 578
Self-citationPlant Growth Promoting Rhizobacteria: Applications and Perspectives In Agriculture
Zahir, Z. A., Arshad, M., & Frankenberger, W. T. (2003) · Advances in agronomy · doi:10.1016/s0065-2113(03)81003-9 · Cited by 566
In Posidonia oceanica cadmium induces changes in DNA methylation and chromatin patterning
Greco, M., Chiappetta, A. A. C., Bruno, L., & Bitonti, M. B. (2011) · Journal of Experimental Botany · doi:10.1093/jxb/err313 · Cited by 555
Idris, R., Trifonova, R., Puschenreiter, M., Wenzel, W. W., & Sessitsch, A. (2004) · Applied and Environmental Microbiology · doi:10.1128/aem.70.5.2667-2677.2004 · Cited by 514
“ing plants (21), may further contribute to the heavy metal”
BackgroundAmelioration of flooding stress by ACC deaminase-containingplant growth-promoting bacteria
Grichko, V. P., & Glick, B. R. (2001) · Plant Physiology and Biochemistry · doi:10.1016/s0981-9428(00)01212-2 · Cited by 514
Self-citationA Plant Growth-Promoting Bacterium That Decreases Nickel Toxicity in Seedlings
Burd, G. I., Dixon, D. G., & Glick, B. R. (1998) · Applied and Environmental Microbiology · doi:10.1128/aem.64.10.3663-3668.1998 · Cited by 502
“It was hypothesized that this enzyme, which has no known function in bacteria, might be part of a hitherto undescribed mechanism used by certain bacteria to stimulate plant growth (21).”
BackgroundSelf-citationSaravanakumar, D., & Samiyappan, R. (2006) · Journal of Applied Microbiology · doi:10.1111/j.1365-2672.2006.03179.x · Cited by 500
“From the previous findings, it has been established that bacteria containing ACC deaminase activity would act to reduce the level of stress ethylene and thus confer resistance to various stresses (Glick et al. 1998).”
BackgroundBacterial-mediated drought tolerance: Current and future prospects
Ngumbi, E., & Kloepper, J. W. (2016) · Applied Soil Ecology · doi:10.1016/j.apsoil.2016.04.009 · Cited by 509
“Reduced ACC levels lead to a reduction in the levels of endogenous ET, thus eliminating the inhibitory effect of higher ET concentrations (Glick et al., 1998).”
BackgroundRole of soil rhizobacteria in phytoremediation of heavy metal contaminated soils
Jing, Y.-D., He, Z. L., & Yang, X. (2007) · Journal of Zhejiang University SCIENCE B · doi:10.1631/jzus.2007.b0192 · Cited by 490
“The model which represents how a PGPR bound to either a seed or plant root lowers the ethylene concentration and thereby prevents ethylene inhibition of root elongation was previously proposed by Glick et al.(1998).”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialMantelin, S. (2003) · Journal of Experimental Botany · doi:10.1093/jxb/erh010 · Cited by 484
Gururani, M. A., Upadhyaya, C. P., Venkidasamy, B., Venkatesh, J., Nookaraju, A., & Park, S. W. (2012) · Journal of Plant Growth Regulation · doi:10.1007/s00344-012-9292-6 · Cited by 487
Tales from the underground: molecular plant–rhizobacteria interactions
Cartieaux, F., Nussaume, L., & Robaglia, C. (2003) · Plant Cell & Environment · doi:10.1046/j.1365-3040.2003.00956.x · Cited by 481
Plant-growth-promoting rhizobacteria to improve crop growth in saline soils: a review
PAUL, D. Z., & Lade, H. S. (2014) · Agronomy for Sustainable Development · doi:10.1007/s13593-014-0233-6 · Cited by 475
“Also in maize and canola, the rhizobacterial treatment increased the total chlorophyll contents (a, b and carotenoids) (Glick et al. 1998; Nadeem et al. 2007).”
BackgroundBelimov, A. A., Игоревна, С. В., Sergeyeva, T. A., Egorova, T. N., Matveyeva, V. A., Tsyganov, V. E., Borisov, A. Y., Tikhonovich, I. A., Kluge, C., Preisfeld, A., et al. (2001) · Canadian Journal of Microbiology · doi:10.1139/w01-062 · Cited by 483
Rhizobacterial mediation of plant hormone status
Dodd, I., Zinovkina, N., Safronova, V., & Belimov, A. (2010) · Annals of Applied Biology · doi:10.1111/j.1744-7348.2010.00439.x · Cited by 446
“Since a dynamic equilibrium of ACC concentration exists between root, rhizosphere and bacterium, bacterial uptake of rhizospheric ACC (for use as a carbon and nitrogen source) decreases root ACC concentration and root ethylene evolution and can increase root growth in vitro (Glick et al., 1998; Penrose et al., 2001).”
BackgroundOrozco-Mosqueda, M. D. C., Glick, B. R., & Santoyo, G. (2020) · Microbiological Research · doi:10.1016/j.micres.2020.126439 · Cited by 454
Self-citationHabib, S. H., Kausar, H., & Saud, H. M. (2016) · BioMed Research International · doi:10.1155/2016/6284547 · Cited by 451
Mechanisms of plant response to salt and drought stress and their alteration by rhizobacteria
Forni, C., Duca, D. R., & Glick, B. R. (2016) · Plant and Soil · doi:10.1007/s11104-016-3007-x · Cited by 453
“The enzyme 1aminocyclopropane-1-carboxylate (ACC) deaminase can cleave plant-derived ACC (the immediate biosynthetic precursor of ethylene) and thereby lower ethylene levels in plants (Glick et al. 1998).”
BackgroundSelf-citationEndophytic bacteria and their potential to enhance heavy metal phytoextraction
Rajkumar, M., Ae, N., & Freitas, H. M. D. O. (2009) · Chemosphere · doi:10.1016/j.chemosphere.2009.06.047 · Cited by 429
Belimov, A. A., Dodd, I. C., Hontzeas, N., et al. (2008) · New Phytologist · doi:10.1111/j.1469-8137.2008.02657.x · Cited by 427
“A model (Glick et al., 1998) suggests that plants exude some ACC from roots or seeds, which is taken up by ACCd-containing bacteria, thus decreasing plant ACC levels and ethylene evolution and thus attenuating ethylene-mediated plant growth inhibition (Burd et al., 1998; Belimov et al., 2001;…”
BackgroundInfluentialBarnawal, D., Bharti, N., Pandey, S. S., Pandey, A., Chanotiya, C. S., & Kalra, A. (2017) · Physiologia Plantarum · doi:10.1111/ppl.12614 · Cited by 438
“…and Vanderleyden 1995, Dodd et al. 2010) or by reducing plant ethylene levels through the bacterial enzyme 1-aminocyclopropane-1-carboxylate (ACC) deaminase, which hydrolyses the ACC (immediate ethylene precursor) into 𝛼-ketobutyrate and ammonia (Honma and Shimomura 1978, Glick et al. 1998).”
BackgroundKang, S., Radhakrishnan, R., Khan, A. L., et al. (2014) · Plant Physiology and Biochemistry · doi:10.1016/j.plaphy.2014.09.001 · Cited by 420
“Root colonization by rhizobacteria are expressing an ACC (1- aminocyclopropane-1-carboxylate) -deaminase, which lowers ethylene level under unfavorable conditions and confers resistance to stress, by catalyzing the conversion of ACC into ammonia and aketobutyrate (Glick et al., 1998).”
BackgroundImprovement of Brassica napus growth under cadmium stress by cadmium-resistant rhizobacteria
Dell’Amico, E., Cavalca, L., & Andreoni, V. (2007) · Soil Biology and Biochemistry · doi:10.1016/j.soilbio.2007.06.024 · Cited by 414
“On the one hand, the bacteria lower the levels of stress ethylene in the plant, thereby allowing the plant to develop longer roots and thus better establish itself during the early stages of growth (Glick et al., 1998).”
BackgroundSiddikee, M. A., Chauhan, P. S., Anandham, R., Han, G.-H., & Sa, T. (2010) · Journal of Microbiology and Biotechnology · doi:10.4014/jmb.1007.07011 · Cited by 412
“PGPR are able to promote plant growth via direct or indirect mechanisms, or a combination of both [15, 16].”
BackgroundResultInfluentialManaging Soil Microorganisms to Improve Productivity of Agro-Ecosystems
Welbaum, G. E., Sturz, A. V., Dong, Z., & Nowak, J. (2004) · Critical Reviews in Plant Sciences · doi:10.1080/07352680490433295 · Cited by 411
Sgroy, V., Cassán, F., Masciarelli, O., Papa, M. F. D., Lagares, A., & Luna, V. (2009) · Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology · doi:10.1007/s00253-009-2116-3 · Cited by 407
“In regard to the homeostasis regulation mechanisms, the ABA production or ACC deaminase activity were confirmed in many isolates, and the current literature has identified a strong relationship between that rhizobacterial capabilities and colonized plant tolerance to salt stress (Cohen et al. 2008; Glick et al. 1998).”
BackgroundInfluentialThe role of plant growth promoting rhizobacteria in plant drought stress responses
Chieb, M., & Gachomo, E. W. (2023) · BMC Plant Biology · doi:10.1186/s12870-023-04403-8 · Cited by 449
“This cleavage decreases ACC and ET levels in the rhizosphere, which lead to a reduction in endogenous ET levels in plants and subsequently, minimize the inhibitory effect of higher ET concentrations [104].”
BackgroundDrought stress amelioration in wheat through inoculation with Burkholderia phytofirmans strain PsJN
Naveed, M., Hussain, M. B., Zahir, Z. A., Mitter, B., & Sessitsch, A. (2013) · Plant Growth Regulation · doi:10.1007/s10725-013-9874-8 · Cited by 402
“2011), inhibition of plant ethylene synthesis (Glick et al. 1998), as well as increasing availability of nutrients like phosphorus, iron and other micro-elements (Costa and Loper 1994; Rodriguez and Fraga 1999), and growth enhancement by volatile compounds (Kai et al.”
BackgroundIsolation and characterization of new plant growth-promoting bacterial endophytes
Rashid, S., Charles, T. C., & Glick, B. R. (2011) · Applied Soil Ecology · doi:10.1016/j.apsoil.2011.09.011 · Cited by 399
Self-citationHuang, X.-D., El-Alawi, Y. S., Penrose, D. M., et al. (2004) · Environmental Pollution · doi:10.1016/j.envpol.2003.09.031 · Cited by 399
Self-citationMultifaceted beneficial effects of rhizosphere microorganisms on plant health and productivity
Avis, T., Gravel, V., Antoun, H., & Tweddell, R. (2008) · Soil Biology and Biochemistry · doi:10.1016/j.soilbio.2008.02.013 · Cited by 384
Bacterial Modulation of Plant Ethylene Levels
Gamalero, E., & Glick, B. R. (2015) · PLANT PHYSIOLOGY · doi:10.1104/pp.15.00284 · Cited by 387
“The (largely bacterial) enzyme ACC deaminase (3.5.99.7) cleaves ACC, the immediate precursor of ethylene in plants, producing ammonia and a-ketobutyrate (Honma and Shimomura, 1978), reducing the amount of ethylene that the plant can synthesize (Glick et al., 1998).”
BackgroundInfluentialSelf-citationLebeau, T., Braud, A., & Jézéquel, K. (2008) · Environmental Pollution · doi:10.1016/j.envpol.2007.09.015 · Cited by 383
“(ACC) deaminase which modulates the level of ethylene by hydrolyzing ACC, a precursor of ethylene, in ammoniac and a-ketobutyrate (Glick et al., 1998).”
BackgroundHyperaccumulators, arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi and stress of heavy metals
Miransari, M. (2011) · Biotechnology Advances · doi:10.1016/j.biotechadv.2011.04.006 · Cited by 378
Arshad, M., Shaharoona, B., & Mahmood, T. (2008) · Pedosphere · doi:10.1016/s1002-0160(08)60055-7 · Cited by 383
Bal, H. B., Nayak, L., Das, S., & Adhya, T. K. (2012) · Plant and Soil · doi:10.1007/s11104-012-1402-5 · Cited by 375
“991 at P>0.01, n015) (Glick et al. 1998; Belimov et al. 2002).”
BackgroundInfluentialAlvin, A., Miller, K. I., & Neilan, B. A. (2014) · Microbiological Research · doi:10.1016/j.micres.2013.12.009 · Cited by 391
Nadeem, S. M., Zahir, Z. A., Naveed, M., & Arshad, M. (2007) · Canadian Journal of Microbiology · doi:10.1139/w07-081 · Cited by 369
Dimkpa, C. O., Merten, D., Svatoš, A., Büchel, G., & Kothe, E. (2009) · Journal of Applied Microbiology · doi:10.1111/j.1365-2672.2009.04355.x · Cited by 382
“…tendae F4 under different metal interplay a-Aminocyclopropane-1-carboxylic acid deaminase (ACCD) assay is used to determine the ability of bacteria to degrade plant ACC, the precursor of ethylene, thereby lowering stress ethylene levels which otherwise affect plant growth (Glick et al. 1998).”
BackgroundMethodPlant growth-promoting rhizobacteria
Podile, A. R., & Kishore, G. K. (2006) · Kluwer Academic Publishers eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-1-4020-4538-7_6 · Cited by 455
Inoculation of endophytic bacteria on host and non-host plants—Effects on plant growth and Ni uptake
Ma, Y., Rajkumar, M., Luo, Y., et al. (2011) · Journal of Hazardous Materials · doi:10.1016/j.jhazmat.2011.08.034 · Cited by 362
PGPR Mediated Alterations in Root Traits: Way Toward Sustainable Crop Production
Grover, M., Bodhankar, S., Sharma, A., Sharma, P., Singh, J. P., & Nain, L. (2021) · Frontiers in Sustainable Food Systems · doi:10.3389/fsufs.2020.618230 · Cited by 367
Rajkumar, M., & Freitas, H. M. D. O. (2008) · Chemosphere · doi:10.1016/j.chemosphere.2007.11.038 · Cited by 360
Taghavi, S., Barac, T., Greenberg, B., Borremans, B., Vangronsveld, J., & van der Lelie, D. (2005) · Applied and Environmental Microbiology · doi:10.1128/aem.71.12.8500-8505.2005 · Cited by 358
Transgenic plants for enhanced biodegradation and phytoremediation of organic xenobiotics
Abhilash, P. C., Jamil, S., & Singh, N. (2009) · Biotechnology Advances · doi:10.1016/j.biotechadv.2009.04.002 · Cited by 354
“Interestingly, this ACC deaminase has been detected in some plant growth-promoting bacteria (PGPR), and thus regulates the biosynthesis of ethylene in inoculated plant roots (Glick et al., 1998; Glick, 2005).”
BackgroundShaharoona, B., Arshad, M., & Zahir, Z. A. (2006) · Letters in Applied Microbiology · doi:10.1111/j.1472-765x.2005.01827.x · Cited by 353
“Recently, inoculation with specific bacteria has been shown to alter the endogenous levels of ethylene, which subsequently led to changes in the growth and development of inoculated plants (Glick et al. 1998).”
BackgroundResultMarques, A. P. G. C., Pires, C., Moreira, H., Rangel, A. O. S. S., & Castro, P. M. L. (2010) · Soil Biology and Biochemistry · doi:10.1016/j.soilbio.2010.04.014 · Cited by 352
“…the amount of ACC, and consequently that of ethylene, therefore reducing the potentially inhibitory effects of higher ethylene concentrations (Glick et al., 1998), feature of extreme importance when plants are exposed to stressful conditions such as heavymetals contamination of the soil…”
InfluentialForchetti, G., Masciarelli, O., Alemano, S. G., Alvarez, D., & Abdala, G. I. (2007) · Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology · doi:10.1007/s00253-007-1077-7 · Cited by 351
“…e-mail: gabdala@exa.unrc.edu.ar D. Alvarez Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria, INTA-EEA Manfredi, Buenos Aires, Argentina 1-carboxylate (ACC) deaminase acts to reduce ethylene level, which is increased by various stresses, and thus confers resistance to stress (Glick et al. 1998).”
BackgroundWang, C., Knill, E., Glick, B. R., et al. (2000) · Canadian Journal of Microbiology · doi:10.1139/w00-071 · Cited by 349
Self-citationBolan, N. S., Park, J. H., Robinson, B. H., Naidu, R., & Huh, K. Y. (2011) · Advances in agronomy · doi:10.1016/b978-0-12-385538-1.00004-4 · Cited by 356
“PGPRs contain an enzyme, 1-aminocyclopropane-1-carboxylate (ACC) deaminase, that catalyzes the cleavage of ACC, which is the precursor of ethylene, and as a result, the endogenous ethylene concentration in plants is reduced (Glick et al., 1998).”
BackgroundSaikia, J., Sarma, R. K., Dhandia, R., Yadav, A., Bharali, R., Gupta, V. K., & Saikia, R. (2018) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-018-21921-w · Cited by 348
Metadata
- Authors
- Glick, B. R., Penrose, D. M., & Li, J.
- Affiliations
- University of Waterloo (CA)
- Corresponding author
- Glick, Bernard R.
- Venue
- Journal of Theoretical Biology
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 1998-01
- Volume
- 190
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 63-68
- ISSN
- 0022-5193 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1999970316
- Cited by
- 1,466
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 17 · 2025: 33 · 2024: 58 · 2023: 72 · 2022: 78 · 2021: 99 · 2020: 90 · 2019: 97 · 2018: 69 · 2017: 69 · 2016: 71 · 2015: 62 · 2014: 70 · 2013: 91 · 2012: 66
- FWCI
- 11.12
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of Theoretical Biology (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Plant-Microbe Interactions and Immunity
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Polyamine Metabolism and Applications
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Postharvest Quality and Shelf Life Management
- Keywords
- plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria, ethylene production, ACC deaminase, ACC oxidase, enzyme kinetics, enzyme competition, root elongation, enzyme expression
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review