Cited by 140Optical Imaging and Spectroscopy TechniquesPhotonic Crystals and ApplicationsComparative Animal Anatomy Studies

The Physical Basis of Transparency in Biological Tissue: Ultrastructure and the Minimization of Light Scattering

Johnsen, Sönke, Widder, Edith A.·1999·Journal of Theoretical Biology

Abstract

In the open ocean, many animals are highly transparent, some achieving near invisibility. However, little is known about how this transparency is attained. The effects of cellular ultrastructure on tissue transparency were mathematically modeled. Given a specific constant volume or surface area of a higher refractive index material (e.g. protein, lipid, etc.), within a lower refractive index cytoplasm or other matrix, the model calculates the total amount of light scattered as a function of how the volume or surface area is subdivided. Given a constant volume, the scattering peaks strongly when the volume is divided into spheres of critical radii. The critical radii depend upon the refractive index of the material relative to its surroundings. Similarly, given a constant surface area, the scattering increases rapidly with sphere size until critical radii (approximating the critical radii for constant volume) are reached, after which the scattering is relatively constant. Under both constraints, refractive index is critical when the particles are small, but becomes progressively less important as particle size increases. When only forward scattering is considered, the results are essentially similar to those found for total scattering. When scattering at only larger angles is considered, the critical radii are independent of refractive index, and the scattered radiance depends critically on refractive index at all particle sizes. The effects of particle shape on scattering dep…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1006/jtbi.1999.0948

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Transparency in animals is a complex form of camouflage involving mechanisms that reduce light scattering and absorption throughout the organism.

    “Transparency in animals is a complex form of camouflage involving mechanisms that reduce light scattering and absorption throughout the organism.”

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Johnsen, S., & Widder, E. A.
Affiliations
Harbor Branch Oceanographic Institute (US)
Corresponding author
Johnsen, Sönke
Venue
Journal of Theoretical Biology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
1999-07
Volume
199
Issue
2
Pages
181-198
ISSN
0022-5193 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2051574864
Cited by
140
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 11 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 7 · 2012: 6
FWCI
3.08
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Theoretical Biology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging › Optical Imaging and Spectroscopy Techniques
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics › Photonic Crystals and Applications
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Urology › Comparative Animal Anatomy Studies
Keywords
tissue transparency, light scattering, cell ultrastructure, refractive index, critical particle size, particle shape, forward scattering, cytoplasm, animal camouflage

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review