Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 273

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Use of Intrinsic Optical Signals to Monitor Physiological Changes in Brain Tissue Slices

Aitken, P.G., Fayuk, D., Somjen, G.G., Turner, D.A.·1999·Methods

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1006/meth.1999.0762

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 273

Metadata

Authors
Aitken, P. G., Fayuk, D., Somjen, G. G., & Turner, D. A.
Venue
Methods
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
1999-06
Volume
18
Issue
2
Pages
91-103
ISSN
1046-2023 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2030424501
Cited by
273
References
2
FWCI
10.94
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Use of Intrinsic Optical Signals to Monitor Physiological Changes in Brain Tissue Slices. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1006/meth.1999.0762
The paper
Aitken, P. G., Fayuk, D., Somjen, G. G., & Turner, D. A. (1999). Use of Intrinsic Optical Signals to Monitor Physiological Changes in Brain Tissue Slices. Methods. https://doi.org/10.1006/meth.1999.0762

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.