Cited by 112Optical Imaging and Spectroscopy TechniquesMigraine and Headache StudiesTraumatic Brain Injury and Neurovascular Disturbances

Potential Sources of Intrinsic Optical Signals Imaged in Live Brain Slices

Andrew, R.David, Jarvis, Cathryn R., Obeidat, Akef S.·1999·Methods

Abstract

Changes in how light is absorbed or scattered in biological tissue are termed intrinsic optical signals (IOSs). Imaging IOSs in the submerged brain slice preparation provides insight into brain activity if it involves significant water movement between intracellular and extracellular compartments. This includes responses to osmotic imbalance, excitotoxic glutamate agonists, and oxygen/glucose deprivation, the latter leading to spreading depression. There are several misconceptions regarding these signals. (1) IOSs are not generated by glial swelling alone. Although neuronal and glia sources cannot yet be directly imaged, several lines of evidence indicate that neurons contribute significantly to the changes in light transmittance. (2) Excitotoxic swelling and osmotic swelling are physiologically different, as are their associated IOSs. Hyposmotic swelling involves no detectable neuronal depolarization of cortical pyramidal neurons, only the passive drawing in of water from a dilute medium across the cell membrane. In contrast excitotoxic swelling involves sustained membrane depolarization associated with inordinate amounts of Na+ and Cl- entry followed by water. IOSs demonstrate substantial damage in the latter case. (3) Osmotic perturbations do not induce volume regulatory mechanisms as measured by IOSs. The osmotic responses measured by IOSs in brain slices are passive, without the compensatory mechanisms that are assumed to be active on a scale suggested by studies of cult…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1006/meth.1999.0771

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Andrew, R. D., Jarvis, C. R., & Obeidat, A. S.
Affiliations
Queen's University (CA)
Venue
Methods
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
1999-06
Volume
18
Issue
2
Pages
185-196
ISSN
1046-2023 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1984571713
Cited by
112
References
3
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 6 · 2017: 2 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 9
FWCI
6.72
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Methods (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Heart and Stroke Foundation of Canada
  • Medical Research Council
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging › Optical Imaging and Spectroscopy Techniques
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Migraine and Headache Studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Neurology › Traumatic Brain Injury and Neurovascular Disturbances
Keywords
intrinsic optical signals, brain slices, optical transmittance, osmotic swelling, cortical spreading depression, oxygen-glucose deprivation, neuronal depolarization, glial swelling, light scattering, glutamate excitotoxicity, migraine aura, neuronal injury
MeSH terms
Animals, Computer Graphics, Electrophysiology, Equipment Design, Hippocampus, Light, Male, Membrane Potentials, Microscopy, Fluorescence, Neuroglia, Neurons, Scattering, Radiation, Software, Spectrometry, Fluorescence, Rats, Sprague-Dawley, Pyramidal Cells, Glutamic Acid, Rats, In Vitro Techniques

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review