The DOI matches its Crossref record.
From Gene to Organismal Phylogeny: Reconciled Trees and the Gene Tree/Species Tree Problem
Open accessAbstract
The processes of gene duplication, loss, and lineage sorting can result in incongruence between the phylogenies of genes and those of species. This incongruence complicates the task of inferring the latter from the former. We describe the use of reconciled trees to reconstruct the history of a gene tree with respect to a species tree. Reconciled trees allow the history of the gene tree to be visualized and also quantify the relationship between the two trees. The cost of a reconciled tree is the total number of duplications and gene losses required to reconcile a gene tree with its species tree. We describe the use of heuristic searches to find the species tree which yields the reconciled tree with the lowest cost. This method can be used to infer species trees from one or more gene trees.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Orthologs, Paralogs, and Evolutionary Genomics
Koonin, E. V. (2005) · Annual Review of Genetics · doi:10.1146/annurev.genet.39.073003.114725 · Cited by 1,323
Is a new and general theory of molecular systematics emerging?
Edwards, S. V. (2009) · Evolution · doi:10.1111/j.1558-5646.2008.00549.x · Cited by 1,040
A maximum pseudo-likelihood approach for estimating species trees under the coalescent model
Liu, L., Yu, L., & Edwards, S. V. (2010) · BMC Evolutionary Biology · doi:10.1186/1471-2148-10-302 · Cited by 607
LIVEZEY, B. C., & ZUSI, R. L. (2007) · Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society · doi:10.1111/j.1096-3642.2006.00293.x · Cited by 574
The evolution of cell types in animals: emerging principles from molecular studies
Arendt, D. (2008) · Nature Reviews Genetics · doi:10.1038/nrg2416 · Cited by 525
Ancient Phylogenetic Relationships
Gribaldo, S., & Philippe, H. (2002) · Theoretical Population Biology · doi:10.1006/tpbi.2002.1593 · Cited by 314
How stands the Tree of Life a century and a half after The Origin?
O'Malley, M. A., & Koonin, E. V. (2011) · Biology Direct · doi:10.1186/1745-6150-6-32 · Cited by 106
Metadata
- Authors
- Page, R. D. M., & Charleston, M. A.
- Venue
- Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 1997-04
- Volume
- 7
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 231-240
- ISSN
- 1055-7903 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2107537542
- Cited by
- 427
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 3.60
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
