The DOI matches its Crossref record.
EFFECTIVENESS AND SENSITIVITY OF VIBRATION PROCESSING TECHNIQUES FOR LOCAL FAULT DETECTION IN GEARS
Open accessAbstract
Abstract This paper deals with gear condition monitoring based on vibration analysis techniques. The detection and diagnostic capability of some of the most effective techniques are discussed and compared on the basis of experimental results, concerning a gear pair affected by a fatigue crack. In particular, the results of new approaches based on time-frequency and cyclostationarity analysis are compared against those obtained by means of the well-accepted cepstrum analysis and time-synchronous average analysis. Moreover, the sensitivity to fault severity is assessed by considering two different depths of the crack. The effect of transducer location and processing options are also shown. In the case of the experimental results considered in this paper, the power cepstrum is practically insensitive to the crack evolution. Conversely, the spectral correlation density function is able to monitor the fault development and does not seem to be significantly influenced by the transducer position. Analysis techniques of the time-synchronous average, such as the ‘residual’ signal and the demodulation technique, are able to localise the damaged tooth; however, the sensitivity of the demodulation technique is strongly dependent on the proper choice of the filtering band and affected by the transducer location. The wavelet transform seems to be a good tool for crack detection; it is particularly effective if the residual part of the time-synchronous averaged signal is processed.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Damage detection of structures by wavelet analysis
Kim, H., & Melhem, H. (2004) · Engineering Structures · doi:10.1016/j.engstruct.2003.10.008 · Cited by 373
Lu, L., He, Y., Wang, T., Shi, T., & Ruan, Y. (2019) · IEEE Access · doi:10.1109/access.2019.2936228 · Cited by 35
Metadata
- Authors
- DALPIAZ, G., RIVOLA, A., & RUBINI, R.
- Venue
- Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2000-05
- Volume
- 14
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 387-412
- ISSN
- 0888-3270 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2042703146
- Cited by
- 338
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 6.76
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: EFFECTIVENESS AND SENSITIVITY OF VIBRATION PROCESSING TECHNIQUES FOR LOCAL FAULT DETECTION IN GEARS. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1006/mssp.1999.1294
- The paper
- DALPIAZ, G., RIVOLA, A., & RUBINI, R. (2000). EFFECTIVENESS AND SENSITIVITY OF VIBRATION PROCESSING TECHNIQUES FOR LOCAL FAULT DETECTION IN GEARS. Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing. https://doi.org/10.1006/mssp.1999.1294
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.