Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 260

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

ROC Analysis of Statistical Methods Used in Functional MRI: Individual Subjects

Open access
Skudlarski, Pawel, Constable, R.Todd, Gore, John C.·1999·NeuroImage

Abstract

The complicated structure of fMRI signals and associated noise sources make it difficult to assess the validity of various steps involved in the statistical analysis of brain activation. Most methods used for fMRI analysis assume that observations are independent and that the noise can be treated as white gaussian noise. These assumptions are usually not true but it is difficult to assess how severely these assumptions are violated and what are their practical consequences. In this study a direct comparison is made between the power of various analytical methods used to detect activations, without reference to estimates of statistical significance. The statistics used in fMRI are treated as metrics designed to detect activations and are not interpreted probabilistically. The receiver operator characteristic (ROC) method is used to compare the efficacy of various steps in calculating an activation map in the study of a single subject based on optimizing the ratio of the number of detected activations to the number of false-positive findings. The main findings are as follows: Preprocessing. The removal of intensity drifts and high-pass filtering applied on the voxel time-course level is beneficial to the efficacy of analysis. Temporal normalization of the global image intensity, smoothing in the temporal domain, and low-pass filtering do not improve power of analysis. Choices of statistics. the cross-correlation coefficient and t-statistic, as well as nonparametric Mann-Whitney statistics, prove to be the most effective and are similar in performance, by our criterion. Task design. the proper design of task protocols is shown to be crucial. In an alternating block design the optimal block length is be approximately 18 s. Spatial clustering. an initial spatial smoothing of images is more efficient than cluster filtering of the statistical parametric activation maps.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1006/nimg.1999.0402

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 3 references

Cited by

See all 260

Metadata

Authors
Skudlarski, P., Constable, R. T., & Gore, J. C.
Venue
NeuroImage
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
1999-03
Volume
9
Issue
3
Pages
311-329
ISSN
1053-8119 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2165715451
Cited by
260
References
3
FWCI
8.55
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
hybrid

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: ROC Analysis of Statistical Methods Used in Functional MRI: Individual Subjects. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1006/nimg.1999.0402
The paper
Skudlarski, P., Constable, R. T., & Gore, J. C. (1999). ROC Analysis of Statistical Methods Used in Functional MRI: Individual Subjects. NeuroImage. https://doi.org/10.1006/nimg.1999.0402

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.