Cited by 327Decision-Making and Behavioral EconomicsSocial and Intergroup PsychologyExperimental Behavioral Economics Studies

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Effects of Procedural and Outcome Accountability on Judgment Quality

Siegel-Jacobs, Karen, Yates, J.Frank·1996·Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes

DOI 10.1006/obhd.1996.0001

Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1006/obhd.1996.0001

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Still being checked.

Sorted by citations

Items 101–200 of 327

The Interactive Effects of Goal Orientation and Accountability on Task Performance
Davis, W. D., Mero, N. P., & Goodman, J. M. (2007) · Human Performance · doi:10.1080/08959280709336926 · Cited by 49
Property Rights, Owner-Management, and Value Creation
Schulze, W., & Zellweger, T. (2020) · Academy of Management Review · doi:10.5465/amr.2018.0377 · Cited by 46
Transforming Conservation
Amano, T., Bako, L. A., Best, M., Boenisch, N., Boersch‐Supan, P. H., Browne, D., Buckley, Y. M., Burgman, M., Cadotte, M. W., Canessa, S., et al. (2022) · Open Book Publishers · doi:10.11647/obp.0321 · Cited by 61
Like Goes with Like: The Role of Representativeness in Erroneous and Pseudo-Scientific Beliefs
Gilovich, T. D., & Savitsky, K. (2002) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511808098.036 · Cited by 50
The limits of psychological safety: Nonlinear relationships with performance
Eldor, L., Hodor, M., & Cappelli, P. H. (2023) · Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes · doi:10.1016/j.obhdp.2023.104255 · Cited by 60
Imagining Can Heighten or Lower the Perceived Likelihood of Contracting a Disease: The Mediating Effect of Ease of Imagery
Sherman, S. J., Cialdini, R. B., Schwartzman, D. F., & Reynolds, K. D. (2002) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511808098.006 · Cited by 46
Buying decision approaches of organizational buyers and users
Moon, J., & Tikoo, S. (2002) · Journal of Business Research · doi:10.1016/s0148-2963(00)00155-7 · Cited by 45
A theoretical responsibility and accountability framework for CSR and global responsibility
Bergsteiner, H., & Avery, G. C. (2010) · Journal of Global Responsibility · doi:10.1108/20412561011038529 · Cited by 44
The effect of outcome and process accountability on customer–supplier negotiations
Chang, L. J., Cheng, M. M.-S., & Trotman, K. T. (2013) · Accounting Organizations and Society · doi:10.1016/j.aos.2012.12.002 · Cited by 45
Stickier Priors: The Effects of Nonanalytic versus Analytic Thinking in New Product Forecasting
Bolton, L. E. (2003) · Journal of Marketing Research · doi:10.1509/jmkr.40.1.65.19129 · Cited by 43
Remarks on Support Theory: Recent Advances and Future Directions
Brenner, L. A., Koehler, D. J., & Rottenstreich, Y. (2002) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511808098.029 · Cited by 45
Dissecting multiple accountabilities: A problem of multiple forums or of conflicting demands?
Aleksovska, M., & Schillemans, T. (2021) · Public Administration · doi:10.1111/padm.12763 · Cited by 42
Searching for certainty in an uncertain world: the difficulty of giving up the experiential for the rational mode of thinking
Schul, Y., & Mayo, R. (2003) · Journal of Behavioral Decision Making · doi:10.1002/bdm.434 · Cited by 41
On My Own: The Aversion to Being Observed during the Preference-Construction Stage
Zwebner, Y., & Schrift, R. Y. (2020) · Journal of Consumer Research · doi:10.1093/jcr/ucaa016 · Cited by 41
The anchoring-bias in groups
de Wilde, T. R. W., Velden, F. S. T., & Dreu, C. K. W. D. (2018) · Journal of Experimental Social Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.jesp.2018.02.001 · Cited by 39
Accountability for others, perceived resources, and well being: Convergent restricted non‐linear results in two samples
Zellars, K. L., Hochwarter, W. A., Lanivich, S. E., Perrewé, P. L., & Ferris, G. R. (2010) · Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology · doi:10.1348/2044-8325.002004 · Cited by 39
The more (complex), the better? The influence of epistemic motivation on integrative bargaining in complex negotiation
van der Schalk, J., Beersma, B., Kleef, G. A. V., & Dreu, C. K. W. D. (2009) · European Journal of Social Psychology · doi:10.1002/ejsp.633 · Cited by 39
Accountability and adaptive performance under uncertainty: A long-term view
Chang, W., Atanasov, P. D., Patil, S. V., Mellers, B. A., & Tetlock, P. E. (2017) · Judgment and Decision Making · doi:10.1017/s1930297500006732 · Cited by 38
It Takes One to Tango: The Effects of Dyads’ Epistemic Motivation Composition in Negotiation
Velden, F. S. T., Beersma, B., & Dreu, C. K. W. D. (2010) · Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin · doi:10.1177/0146167210383698 · Cited by 37
The Hot Hand in Basketball: On the Misperception of Random Sequences
Gilovich, T. D., Vallone, R. P., & Tversky, A. (2002) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511808098.035 · Cited by 39
Organizational structure, organizational form, and counterproductive work behavior: A competitive test of the bureaucratic and post-bureaucratic views
Dischner, S. (2015) · Scandinavian Journal of Management · doi:10.1016/j.scaman.2015.10.002 · Cited by 41
Improving information evaluation for intelligence production
Irwin, D., & Mandel, D. R. (2019) · Intelligence & National Security · doi:10.1080/02684527.2019.1569343 · Cited by 35
One Size Does Not Fit All: Questions to Answer Before Intervening to Change Physician Behavior
Poses, R. M. (1999) · The Joint Commission Journal on Quality Improvement · doi:10.1016/s1070-3241(16)30463-1 · Cited by 35
Accountability Systems and Group Norms: Balancing the Risks of Mindless Conformity and Reckless Deviation
Patil, S. V., Tetlock, P. E., & Mellers, B. A. (2016) · Journal of Behavioral Decision Making · doi:10.1002/bdm.1933 · Cited by 37
When Ethical Tones at the Top Conflict: Adapting Priority Rules to Reconcile Conflicting Tones
Warren, D. E., Peytcheva, M., & Gaspar, J. P. (2015) · Business Ethics Quarterly · doi:10.1017/beq.2015.40 · Cited by 33
The role of accountability in reducing the impact of affective reactions on capital budgeting decisions
Fehrenbacher, D. D., Kaplan, S. E., & Moulang, C. (2019) · Management Accounting Research · doi:10.1016/j.mar.2019.100650 · Cited by 35
“Do the Right Thing:” Diverging Effects of Accountability in a Managerial Context
Brown, C. L. (1999) · Marketing Science · doi:10.1287/mksc.18.3.230 · Cited by 33
The Effects of Joint Provision and Disclosure of Non-Audit Services on Audit Committee Members' Decisions and Investors' PreferencesPreprint
Gaynor, L. M., McDaniel, L. S., & Neal, T. L. (2004) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.564946 · Cited by 32
When can felt accountability promote innovative work behavior? The role of transformational leadership
Kuo, C., Ni, Y.-L., Wu, C., Duh, R., Chen, M., & Chang, C.-C. (2021) · Personnel Review · doi:10.1108/pr-03-2021-0174 · Cited by 36
The Effects of Process Accountability on Individuals’ Use of a Familiar Technology
Cornell, R. M., Eining, M. M., & Hu, P. J. (2011) · Journal of Information Systems · doi:10.2308/jis.2011.25.1.109 · Cited by 30
Risky Choice in the Limelight
Baltussen, G., van den Assem, M. J., & van Dolder, D. (2015) · The Review of Economics and Statistics · doi:10.1162/rest_a_00505 · Cited by 32
A Wolf in Sheep’s Clothing: Exploring the Relationship Between Leader Humility and Unethical Behavior
B, D. K., Lowe, K. B., Bahmannia, S., Cui, L., & Chen, Z. X. (2021) · Journal of Management · doi:10.1177/01492063211029708 · Cited by 34
Accountable for What? The Effect of Accountability Standard Specification on Decision-Making Behavior in the Public Sector
Aleksovska, M. (2021) · Public Performance & Management Review · doi:10.1080/15309576.2021.1900880 · Cited by 28
Accountability Increases Resource Sharing: Effects of Accountability on Human and AI System Performance
León, G. A., Chiou, E. K., & Wilkins, A. (2020) · International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction · doi:10.1080/10447318.2020.1824695 · Cited by 29
Bias and Accuracy in the Evaluation of Confession Evidence
Lassiter, G. D., & Geers, A. L. (2004) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-0-387-38598-3_9 · Cited by 27
Accountability and the Camera Perspective Bias in Videotaped Confessions
Lassiter, G. D., Munhall, P. J., Geers, A. L., Weiland, P. E., & Handley, I. M. (2001) · Analyses of Social Issues and Public Policy · doi:10.1111/1530-2415.00003 · Cited by 28
Who’s Watching? Accountability in Different Audit Regimes and the Effects on Auditors’ Professional Skepticism
Hoos, F., Pruijssers, J. L., & Lander, M. W. (2017) · Journal of Business Ethics · doi:10.1007/s10551-017-3603-6 · Cited by 25
Emotion effects on choice deferral
Garg, N., Inman, J. J., & Mittal, V. (2017) · European Journal of Marketing · doi:10.1108/ejm-12-2015-0861 · Cited by 24
Accountability and Public Interest in Government Institutions
Kwemarira, G., Ntayi, J. M., & Munene, J. C. K. (2019) · International Journal of Public Administration · doi:10.1080/01900692.2019.1672187 · Cited by 24
Executive work design: New perspectives and future directions
Munyon, T. P., Summers, J. K., Buckley, M. R., Ranft, A. L., & Ferris, G. R. (2010) · Journal of Organizational Behavior · doi:10.1002/job.620 · Cited by 25
Punctuated incongruity: A new approach to managing trade-offs between conformity and deviation
Patil, S. V., & Tetlock, P. E. (2014) · Research in Organizational Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.riob.2014.08.002 · Cited by 23
Accountability and Role Effects in Balanced Scorecard Performance Evaluations When Strategy Timeline Is Specified
Bartlett, G. D., Johnson, E. N., & Reckers, P. M. J. (2013) · European Accounting Review · doi:10.1080/09638180.2013.809977 · Cited by 23
You Are in Charge: Experimentally Testing the Motivating Power of Holding a Judicial Office
Engel, C., & Zhurakhovska, L. (2017) · The Journal of Legal Studies · doi:10.1086/691630 · Cited by 26
How Good Are Fast and Frugal Heuristics?
Gigerenzer, G., Czerlinski, J., & Martignon, L. F. (2002) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511808098.033 · Cited by 24
Answerable for what? The role of accountability focus in line manager HR implementation
Hewett, R., Sikora, D. M., Brees, J. R., & Moelijker, R. (2023) · Human Resource Management · doi:10.1002/hrm.22189 · Cited by 24
Team Collective Intelligence in Dynamically Complex Projects—A Shipbuilding Case
Hansen, M. J., Vaagen, H., & van Oorschot, K. E. (2020) · Project Management Journal · doi:10.1177/8756972820928695 · Cited by 28
Modeling Extreme Risks in Ecology
Burgman, M., Franklin, J., Hayes, K. R., Hosack, G. R., Peters, G. W., & Sisson, S. A. (2012) · Risk Analysis · doi:10.1111/j.1539-6924.2012.01871.x · Cited by 23
Evaluating extreme risks in invasion ecology: learning from banking compliance
Franklin, J., Sisson, S. A., Burgman, M. A., & Martin, J. K. (2008) · Diversity and Distributions · doi:10.1111/j.1472-4642.2008.00478.x · Cited by 21
Individual Civil Servants' Conceptions Of Accountability
Lupson, J., & Partington, D. (2011) · Public Management Review · doi:10.1080/14719037.2011.589609 · Cited by 23
Resistance of Personal Risk Perceptions to Debiasing Interventions
Weinstein, N. D., & Klein, W. M. P. (2002) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511808098.019 · Cited by 24
The Weighing of Evidence and the Determinants of Confidence
Griffin, D., & Tversky, A. (2002) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511808098.015 · Cited by 20
Do Key Audit Matters Impact Financial Reporting Behavior?Preprint
Klueber, J., Nöteberg, A., & Pott, C. (2018) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.3210475 · Cited by 21
Balancing Fairness and Efficiency: The Impact of Identity-Blind and Identity-Conscious Accountability on Applicant Screening
Self, W. T., Mitchell, G., Mellers, B. A., Tetlock, P. E., & Hildreth, J. A. D. (2015) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0145208 · Cited by 25
Reaffirming the importance of managerial discretion in corporate governance: a comment on Andersen (2017)
Youssef, M. H., & Teng, D. (2018) · Corporate Governance · doi:10.1108/cg-05-2018-0172 · Cited by 19
The Effects of Joint Provision and Disclosure of Nonaudit Services on Audit Committee Members' Decisions and Investors' Preferences
Gaynor, L. M., McDaniel, L. S., & Neal, T. L. (2006) · The Accounting Review · doi:10.1521/accr.2006.81.4.873 · Cited by 19
Videotaped Confessions: Panacea or Pandora's Box?
Lassiter, G. D., Ratcliff, J. J., Ware, L. J., & Irvin, C. R. (2006) · Law & Policy · doi:10.1111/j.1467-9930.2006.00223.x · Cited by 19
The Impact of Representation Norms on the Quality of Judicial DecisionsPreprint
Engel, C. (2004) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.617821 · Cited by 16
Accountability, Framing Effects, and Risk-Seeking by Elected Representatives: An Experimental Study with American Local Politicians
Sheffer, L., & Loewen, P. J. (2019) · Political Research Quarterly · doi:10.1177/1065912918775252 · Cited by 33
Exploring project managers’ accountability
Rezania, D., Baker, R., & Nixon, A. (2019) · International Journal of Managing Projects in Business · doi:10.1108/ijmpb-03-2018-0037 · Cited by 18
Learning to manage and managing to learn
Gates, G. R., & Cooksey, R. (1998) · Journal of Workplace Learning · doi:10.1108/13665629810370003 · Cited by 18
Theory-Driven Reasoning about Plausible Pasts and Probable Futures in World Politics
Tetlock, P. E. (2002) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511808098.044 · Cited by 18
The next best thing: Social presence and accountability's impact on auditor professional skepticism
Sorensen, K. B., & Ortegren, M. (2021) · Journal of Corporate Accounting & Finance · doi:10.1002/jcaf.22484 · Cited by 17
Public eyewitness confidence can be influenced by the presence of other witnesses.
Shaw, J. S., Appio, L. M., Zerr, T. K., & Pontoski, K. E. (2007) · Law and Human Behavior · doi:10.1007/s10979-006-9080-6 · Cited by 17
The application of AI in digital HRM – an experiment on human decision-making in personnel selection
Malin, C. D., Fleiß, J., Seeber, I., Kubicek, B., Kupfer, C., & Thalmann, S. (2024) · Business Process Management Journal · doi:10.1108/bpmj-11-2023-0884 · Cited by 21
Work-report formats and overbilling: How unit-reporting vs. cost-reporting increases accountability and decreases overbilling
Desai, S. D., & Kouchaki, M. (2015) · Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes · doi:10.1016/j.obhdp.2015.06.007 · Cited by 16
Improving the Quality of Financial-Statement Audits by Updating External Auditors’ Accountabilities
Peecher, M. E., Solomon, I., & Trotman, K. T. (2012) · Cited by 16
The role of accountability in the performance of Jazia prime vendor system in Tanzania
Kuwawenaruwa, A., Tediosi, F., Obrist, B., Metta, E. O., Chiluda, F., Wiedenmayer, K., & Wyss, K. (2020) · Journal of Pharmaceutical Policy and Practice · doi:10.1186/s40545-020-00220-8 · Cited by 16
Quantification and Persuasion in Managerial JudgmentPreprint
Kadous, K., Koonce, L. L., & Towry, K. L. (2003) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.313039 · Cited by 16
Justification and conformity
Xiao, E. (2017) · Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization · doi:10.1016/j.jebo.2017.01.015 · Cited by 14
The accountability paradox: How holding marketers accountable hinders alignment with short-term marketing goals
Casenave, É., & Klarmann, M. (2020) · Journal of Business Research · doi:10.1016/j.jbusres.2020.02.047 · Cited by 13
Unaccounted for no more: Explicating managers' role in accountability enactment
Brees, J., & Ellen, B. (2021) · Journal of Organizational Behavior · doi:10.1002/job.2573 · Cited by 9
The effect of accountability on management accountants’ selection of information
Rausch, A., & Brauneis, A. (2014) · Review of Managerial Science · doi:10.1007/s11846-014-0126-8 · Cited by 13
Implementing Planned Change: An Empirical Comparison of Theoretical Perspectives
Ford, M. W., & Greer, B. M. (2005) · Mid-American Journal of Business · doi:10.1108/19355181200500012 · Cited by 13
RETRACTED: Continuous monitoring and the status quo effect
Hunton, J. E., Mauldin, E. G., & Wheeler, P. R. (2010) · International Journal of Accounting Information Systems · doi:10.1016/j.accinf.2010.07.016 · Cited by 12
Retracted
Elevating Developers’ Accountability Awareness in AI Systems Development
Schmidt, J.-H., Bartsch, S. C., Adam, M., & Benlian, A. (2025) · Business & Information Systems Engineering · doi:10.1007/s12599-024-00914-2 · Cited by 15
Reimagining Accountability in K-12 Education: A Behavioral Science Perspective
Gill, B., Lerner, J. S., & Meosky, P. (2016) · Behavioral Science & Policy · doi:10.1353/bsp.2016.0007 · Cited by 17
Accountability in Organizations: An Examination of Antecedents and Consequences
Hall, A. T. (2005) · Cited by 12
Effects of Process and Outcome Accountability on Idea Generation
Häusser, J. A., Frisch, J. U., Wanzel, S. K., & Schulz‐Hardt, S. (2017) · Experimental Psychology (formerly Zeitschrift für Experimentelle Psychologie) · doi:10.1027/1618-3169/a000368 · Cited by 11
High-stakes innovation: When collaboration in teams enhances (or undermines) innovation in professional service firms
Cromwell, J. R., & Gardner, H. K. (2019) · Journal of Professions and Organization · doi:10.1093/jpo/joz017 · Cited by 12
Auditors' Evaluation of Subsequent Events: The Effects of Prior Commitment and Type of Accountability
Phang, S., & FARGHER, N. L. (2018) · Auditing A Journal of Practice & Theory · doi:10.2308/ajpt-52334 · Cited by 11
Real options or net present value?
Tubetov, D., Maart-Noelck, S. C., & Mußhoff, O. (2013) · Agricultural Finance Review · doi:10.1108/afr-06-2012-0031 · Cited by 10
When Will Interviewers Be Willing to Use High‐structured Job Interviews? The role of personality
Tsai, W., Chen, F. H., Chen, H., & Tseng, K. (2016) · International Journal of Selection and Assessment · doi:10.1111/ijsa.12133 · Cited by 10
Moderators of the Liking Bias in Judgments of Moral Character
Bocian, K., Baryła, W., & Wojciszke, B. (2021) · Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin · doi:10.1177/01461672211013272 · Cited by 10
Assessing Uncertainty in Physical Constants
Henrion, M., & Fischhoff, B. (2002) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511808098.039 · Cited by 10
What Have We Learned from Our Mistakes?
Mellers, B. A., & Locke, C. C. (2007) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511611308.019 · Cited by 9
Trusting information systems in everyday work events – effects on cognitive resources, performance, and well-being
Müller, L. S., & Hertel, G. (2023) · Ergonomics · doi:10.1080/00140139.2023.2286910 · Cited by 9
The Effect of Outcome vs. Process Accountability-Focus on Performance: A Meta-Analysis
Sharon, I., Drach‐Zahavy, A., & Srulovici, E. (2022) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2022.795117 · Cited by 11
What I do or how I do it - the effect of accountability focus on individual exploration
Verwaeren, B., & Nijstad, B. A. (2021) · European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology · doi:10.1080/1359432x.2021.1967322 · Cited by 10
The Use of Statistical Heuristics in Everyday Inductive Reasoning
Nisbett, R. E., Krantz, D. H., Jepson, C., & Kunda, Z. (2002) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511808098.030 · Cited by 9
Teacher Responsibility: Its Meaning, Measure, and Educational Implications.
Lauermann, F. (2013) · Deep Blue (University of Michigan) · Cited by 9
Examining the judgments of pedophiles in relation to a non-sexual offense
Maroño, A., & Bartels, R. M. (2020) · Psychology Crime and Law · doi:10.1080/1068316x.2020.1742339 · Cited by 7
The Millennial Generation and Personal Accountability: Spiritual and Classroom Implications
Black, J. A., Smith, Y. S., & Keels, J. K. (1969) · Christian Business Academy Review · doi:10.69492/cbar.v9i0.30 · Cited by 8
Support Theory: A Nonextensional Representation of Subjective Probability
Tversky, A., & Koehler, D. J. (2002) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511808098.027 · Cited by 8
Controls and Cooperation in Dynamic Environments: The Role of Involvement in Control Design
Grasser, R., Majerczyk, M., Staehle, M., & Di, Y. (2017) · Contemporary Accounting Research · doi:10.1111/1911-3846.12675 · Cited by 8
Accountability at its Finest: Law Enforcement Agencies and Body-Worn Cameras
Wright, J. E., & Houston, B. D. (2021) · Public Performance & Management Review · doi:10.1080/15309576.2021.1916545 · Cited by 7
Social Context Effects in the Display of Emotion: Accountability in a Simulated Organization1
Tunguz, S., & Carnevale, P. (2011) · Journal of Applied Social Psychology · doi:10.1111/j.1559-1816.2011.00768.x · Cited by 7
Intuitive Politicians, Theologians, and Prosecutors: Exploring the Empirical Implications of Deviant Functionalist Metaphors
Tetlock, P. E. (2002) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511808098.034 · Cited by 7
Justifying the judgment process affects neither judgment accuracy, nor strategy use
Hoffmȧnn, J., Gaissmaier, W., & von Helversen, B. (2017) · Judgment and Decision Making · doi:10.1017/s1930297500006744 · Cited by 8
Two-sided Effect of Empowering Leadership on Follower’s Job Stress
Sohn, Y. W., & Kang, Y. J. (2020) · Korean Journal of Industrial and Organizational Psychology · doi:10.24230/kjiop.v33i4.373-407 · Cited by 9
Purchasing for someone else in a b-to-b context: Joint effects of choice overload and accountability
Schaffrath, K., Wentzel, D., & Erkin, A. (2018) · Journal of Business-to-Business Marketing · doi:10.1080/1051712x.2018.1424749 · Cited by 7

Authors: Siegel-Jacobs, K., & Yates, J. F.
Affiliations: University of Colorado Boulder (US)
University of Michigan (US)
Venue: Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes
Publisher: Elsevier BV
Published: 1996-01
Volume: 65
Issue: 1
Pages: 1-17
ISSN: 0749-5978 (ISSN-L)
DOI: 10.1006/obhd.1996.0001
OpenAlex: W1970614775
Cited by: 327
References: 0
Citations by year: 2026: 6 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 22 · 2021: 16 · 2020: 17 · 2019: 13 · 2018: 10 · 2017: 12 · 2016: 9 · 2015: 15 · 2014: 10 · 2013: 11 · 2012: 12
FWCI: 3.46
Type: journal article
Language: en
Open access: closed
Licence: www.elsevier.com/tdm/userlicense/1.0/ (tdm)
Locations: Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes (publishedVersion)
RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
Topics: Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › General Decision Sciences › Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics
Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Social and Intergroup Psychology
Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies
Keywords: procedural accountability, outcome accountability, judgment quality, attitude judgment, information use, judgment accuracy, outcome feedback

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Effects of Procedural and Outcome Accountability on Judgment Quality

Overview

Integrity signals

Verification

Claims the paper makes

Claims other papers make about this one

Citations

Cites

Cited by

Related

Metadata

Record

About these checks