Cited by 149Forest Insect Ecology and ManagementTree-ring climate responsesGeology and Paleoclimatology Research

Mid-Holocene Hemlock Decline in Eastern North America Linked with Phytophagous Insect Activity

Bhiry, Najat, Filion, Louise·1996·Quaternary Research

Abstract

Macrofossil evidence indicates that the mid-Holocene hemlock [Tsuga canadensisL. (Carr.)] decline that occurred over a wide area in eastern North America was associated with phytophagous insect activity.In situhemlock macrofossils and insect remains found in a paludified dunefield at the northern limit of hemlock testify that two defoliation events occurred at 4910 ± 90 and 4200 ± 100 yr B.P., respectively. The sharp coincidence of remains from hemlock needles with chewing damage typical of hemlock looper feeding, head capsules from the hemlock looper (Lambdina fiscellaria) and the spruce budworm (Choristoneura fumiferana), absence of hemlock fruiting remains, and tree-ring anomalies in fossil hemlocks that died prematurely (<165 yr) suggest that defoliation affected hemlock reproductive capacity and pollen productivity, or more likely caused mass mortality. Our findings indicate that defoliation can affect ecosystems for centuries, especially when long-lived tree species are involved.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1006/qres.1996.0032

Cites

23 of 23 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. Anderson, 1985, Late-Quaternary pollen records from eastern Ontario, Québec, and Atlantic Canada., “Pollen Records of Late-Quaternary North American Sediments”, 281
  2. Gaudreau, 1985, Late Quaternary pollen stratigraphy and isochrones maps for Northeastern United States., “Pollen Records of Late-Quaternary North American Sediments”, 245

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Bhiry, N., & Filion, L.
Affiliations
Center for Northern Studies (CA)
Venue
Quaternary Research
Published
1996-05
Volume
45
Issue
3
Pages
312-320
ISSN
  • 0033-5894 (ISSN-L)
  • 1096-0287
OpenAlex
W2052134149
Cited by
149
References
23
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 12 · 2012: 7
FWCI
5.23
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Quaternary Research (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Forest Insect Ecology and Management
  • Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Atmospheric Science › Tree-ring climate responses
  • Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Atmospheric Science › Geology and Paleoclimatology Research
Keywords
hemlock decline, Tsuga canadensis, mid-Holocene, phytophagous insects, defoliation, hemlock looper, Lambdina fiscellaria, spruce budworm, mass mortality, eastern North America

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review