Cited by 202Social and Intergroup PsychologySocial Capital and NetworksCultural Differences and Values

Factors Relating to Misanthropy in Contemporary American Society

Smith, Tom W.·1997·Social Science Research

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1006/ssre.1997.0592

Cites

49 of 49 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Smith, T. W.
Affiliations
University of Chicago (US)
Corresponding author
Smith, Tom W.
Venue
Social Science Research
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
1997-06
Volume
26
Issue
2
Pages
170-196
ISSN
0049-089X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1989403579
Cited by
202
References
49
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 9 · 2017: 18 · 2016: 10 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 10 · 2012: 10
FWCI
47.33
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Social Science Research (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Social and Intergroup Psychology
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Social Capital and Networks
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Cultural Differences and Values
Keywords
misanthropy, socioeconomic status, racial and ethnic minorities, Southerners, negative life events, church attendance, religious fundamentalism, cohort effects, intergroup contact, American society

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review