Verbal ability and socioeconomic success: A trend analysis
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Historical increases in the quantity of educational attainment during the 20th century are a major factor underlying cognitive cohort differences.
“Our rationale was that historical increases in the quantity of educational attainment during the 20th century are a major factor underlying cognitive cohort differences (Alwin & McCammon, 2001; Hauser & Huang, 1997; Rönnlund et al., 2005).”
From Cohort differences in cognitive aging and terminal decline in the Seattle Longitudinal Study. (2011) · cites this paper as Hauser & Huang, 1997
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Socioeconomic Status and Academic Achievement: A Meta-Analytic Review of Research
Sirin, S. R. (2005) · Review of Educational Research · doi:10.3102/00346543075003417 · Cited by 4,687 · see citing works
Education and cognitive functioning across the life span
Lövdén, M., Fratiglioni, L., Glymour, M. M., Lindenberger, U., & Tucker-Drob, E. M. (2020) · Psychological Science in the Public Interest · doi:10.1177/1529100620920576 · Cited by 1,224 · see citing works
Link, B. G., Phelan, J. C., Miech, R., & Westin, E. L. (2008) · Journal of Health and Social Behavior · doi:10.1177/002214650804900106 · Cited by 234 · see citing works
Cohort differences in cognitive aging and terminal decline in the Seattle Longitudinal Study.
Gerstorf, D., Ram, N., Hoppmann, C., Willis, S. L., & Schaie, K. W. (2011) · Developmental Psychology · doi:10.1037/a0023426 · Cited by 154 · see citing works
- Authors
- Hauser, R. M., & Huang, M.-H.
- Affiliations
- University of Wisconsin–Madison (US)
- ORCID
- Hauser, Robert M.
- Venue
- Social Science Research
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 1997-09
- Volume
- 26
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 331-376
- ISSN
- 0049-089X (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2065145656
- Cited by
- 117
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2024: 1 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 6 · 2012: 2
- FWCI
- 10.86
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Social Science Research (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Intergenerational and Educational Inequality Studies
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Cognitive Abilities and Testing
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Social and Cultural Dynamics
- Keywords
- verbal ability, socioeconomic stratification, The Bell Curve, educational attainment, occupational status, income inequality, social background
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
