Designing Sociable Machines: Lessons Learned
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Technologies have altered HRM organisational communications, introduced social robots to HRM practices, and enabled new means of employer branding.
“altered the HRM organisational communications (Kiesler, Siegel, & McGuire, 1984), introduced social robots to the HRM practices (Breazeal, 2002), and enabled new means of employer branding (Martin & Cerdin, 2014).”
From Conceptualising the future of HRM and technology research (2016) · cites this paper as Breazeal, 2002
Cited by
Sorted by citations
A survey of socially interactive robots
Fong, T., Nourbakhsh, I., & Dautenhahn, K. (2003) · Robotics and Autonomous Systems · doi:10.1016/s0921-8890(02)00372-x · Cited by 3,162 · see citing works
Socially intelligent robots: Dimensions of human-robot interaction
Dautenhahn, K. (2007) · Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences · doi:10.1098/rstb.2006.2004 · Cited by 1,210 · see citing works
Conceptualising the future of HRM and technology research
Bondarouk, T., & Brewster, C. (2016) · The International Journal of Human Resource Management · doi:10.1080/09585192.2016.1232296 · Cited by 438 · see citing works
de Graaf, M. M. A., Allouch, S. B., & Klamer, T. (2015) · Computers in Human Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.chb.2014.10.030 · Cited by 299 · see citing works
Pradhan, A., Findlater, L., & Lazar, A. (2019) · Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction · doi:10.1145/3359316 · Cited by 223 · see citing works
The University of North Carolina at Charlotte, Zhou, L., Rudin, C., Duke University, Gombolay, M., Georgia Institute of Technology, Spohrer, J., International Society of Service Innovation Professionals, Zhou, M., Juji, et al. (2023) · AIS Transactions on Human-Computer Interaction · doi:10.17705/1thci.00085 · Cited by 20 · see citing works
- Authors
- Breazeal, C.
- Corresponding author
- Breazeal, Cynthia
- ORCID
- Breazeal, Cynthia
- Venue
- Multiagent Systems, Artificial Societies, and Simulated Organizations
- Publisher
- Springer US
- Published
- 2002
- Pages
- 149-156
- ISSN
- 1568-2617 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W199033134
- Cited by
- 133
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 12 · 2017: 10 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 10 · 2012: 6
- FWCI
- 11.37
- Type
- book chapter
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Licence
- www.springer.com/tdm (tdm)
- Locations
- Multiagent systems, artificial societies, and simulated organizations (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Social Robot Interaction and HRI
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Speech and dialogue systems
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Human-Computer Interaction › Innovative Human-Technology Interaction
- Keywords
- humanoid robots, human-robot interaction, robot design
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
