The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Constructing Test Items
Abstract
1. What Is Constructing Test Items? 2. Definition, Purpose, and Characteristics of Items. 3. Determining the Content for Items: Validity. 4. Starting to Write Items: Practical Considerations. 5. Style, Editorial, and Publication Guidelines for Items in the Multiple-Choice Format. 6. Style, Editorial, and Publication Guidelines for Items in Constructed-Response and Performance Formats. 7. Style, Editorial, and Publication Guidelines for Items in Other Common Formats. 8. Judging the Quality of Test Items: Item Analysis. 9. Ethical, Legal Considerations, and Final Remarks for Item Writers. References. Author Index. Subject Index.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Covid-19 pandemic and online learning: the challenges and opportunities
Adedoyin, O. B., & Soykan, E. (2023) · Interactive Learning Environments · doi:10.1080/10494820.2020.1813180 · Cited by 2,729
Climate‐Science Communication and the Measurement Problem
Kahan, D. M. (2015) · Political Psychology · doi:10.1111/pops.12244 · Cited by 559
Measuring progressions: Assessment structures underlying a learning progression
Wilson, M. (2009) · Journal of Research in Science Teaching · doi:10.1002/tea.20318 · Cited by 329
Gender and socioeconomic related differences in performance based ICT competences
Aesaert, K., & van Braak, J. (2015) · Computers & Education · doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2014.12.017 · Cited by 188
(2006) · The Journal of Technology, Learning and Assessment (Boston College) · Cited by 175
Metadata
- Venue
- Evaluation in Education and Human Services
- Publisher
- Kluwer Academic Publishers
- Published
- 2002
- OpenAlex
- W652308888
- Cited by
- 213
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 39.30
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Constructing Test Items. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1007/0-306-47535-9
- The paper
- Constructing Test Items. (2002). Evaluation in Education and Human Services. https://doi.org/10.1007/0-306-47535-9
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
