Cited by 174Open Source Software InnovationsService and Product InnovationInnovation, Technology, and Society

Welfare Implications of User Innovation

Henkel, Joachim, von Hippel, Eric·2005·Essays in Honor of Edwin Mansfield

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/0-387-25022-0_5

Cites

5 of 5 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Henkel, J., & von Hippel, E.
Affiliations
Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München (DE)
Corresponding author
Henkel, Joachim
Venue
Essays in Honor of Edwin Mansfield
Publisher
Springer US
Published
2005
Pages
45-59
OpenAlex
W3124652655
Cited by
174
References
5
Citations by year
2025: 2 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 13 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 12 · 2016: 9 · 2015: 14 · 2014: 15 · 2013: 15 · 2012: 9
FWCI
18.29
Type
book chapter
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Springer eBooks (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Science Applications › Open Source Software Innovations
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Marketing › Service and Product Innovation
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Innovation, Technology, and Society
Keywords
user innovation, social welfare (welfare economics), welfare analysis, innovation efficiency, innovation policy

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review