PreprintCited by 1,531Open Source Software InnovationsSoftware Engineering Techniques and PracticesCopyright and Intellectual Property

Why Hackers Do What They Do: Understanding Motivation and Effort in Free/Open Source Software Projects

Open access
Lakhani, Karim R., Wolf, Robert G.·2003·The MIT Press eBooks

Abstract

In this paper we report on the results of a study of the effort and motivations of individuals to contributing to the creation of Free/Open Source software. We used a Web-based survey, administered to 684 software developers in 287 F/OSS projects, to learn what lies behind the effort put into such projects. Academic theorizing on individual motivations for participating in F/OSS projects has posited that external motivational factors in the form of extrinsic benefits (e.g.: better jobs, career advancement) are the main drivers of effort. We find in contrast, that enjoyment-based intrinsic motivation, namely how creative a person feels when working on the project, is the strongest and most pervasive driver. We also find that user need, intellectual stimulation derived from writing code, and improving programming skills are top motivators for project participation. A majority of our respondents are skilled and experienced professionals working in IT-related jobs, with approximately 40 percent being paid to participate in the F/OSS project.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2139/ssrn.443040

Cites

19 of 19 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Expected benefits of OSS contribution include signaling skills to the labor market, building reputation within the community, and deriving intrinsic satisfaction and a sense of achievement.

    “Expected benefits include signaling skills to the labor market, building reputation within the community, and deriving intrinsic satisfaction and a sense of achievement (Lakhani and Wolf 2003, Roberts et al. 2006, Hann et al. 2013).”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Lakhani, K. R., & Wolf, R. G.
Affiliations
  • Harvard University (US)
  • Boston Consulting Group (United States) (US)
Corresponding author
Lakhani, Karim R.
Venue
The MIT Press eBooks
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2003
Pages
3-22
OpenAlex
W4255589644
Cited by
1,531
References
18
Citations by year
2026: 15 · 2025: 24 · 2024: 29 · 2023: 37 · 2022: 39 · 2021: 59 · 2020: 58 · 2019: 91 · 2018: 75 · 2017: 90 · 2016: 82 · 2015: 83 · 2014: 107 · 2013: 87 · 2012: 103
FWCI
163.48
Type
book chapter
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • The MIT Press eBooks (publishedVersion)
  • SSRN Electronic Journal (acceptedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Science Applications › Open Source Software Innovations
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Software Engineering Techniques and Practices
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Marketing › Copyright and Intellectual Property
Keywords
hackers, motivation, effort, free and open source software, open source communities, developer behavior

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review