CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 164Morphological variations and asymmetryForensic Anthropology and Bioarchaeology StudiesTopological and Geometric Data Analysis

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 43 of the 43 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Fourier Descriptors, Procrustes Superimposition, and Data Dimensionality: An Example of Cranial Shape Analysis in Modern Human Populations

Baylac, Michel, Frieß, Martin·2006·Developments in Primatology: Progress and Prospects
DOI 10.1007/0-387-27614-9_6
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/0-387-27614-9_6

Cites

43 of 43 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • As a result of ACD practice, the cranial base decreases its normal angle and increases the anterior-inferior projection of the viscerocranium.

    “as a result of ACD practice cranial base decreases its normal angle and increases the anterior-inferior projection of the viscerocranium.”

    From Morphological consequences of artificial cranial deformation: Modularity and integration (2020) · cites this paper as [84]

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 5

  1. Baylac, M. and Penin, X., 1998, Wing static allometry in Drosophila simulans males (Diptera, Drosophilidae) and its relationships with developmental compartments, Acta Zool. 44:97–112.
  2. Frieß, M., (dy1999), Some aspects of cranial size and shape, and their variation among later pleistocene hominids, Anthropologie (Brno) 37(3):231–238.
  3. Penin, X. and Baylac, M., 1995, Analysis of the skull shape changes in Apes, using 3D procrustes superimposition, Proceedings in Current Issues in Statistical Analysis of Shape, pp. 208–210.
  4. Rohlf, F. J., 1990, Fitting curves to outlines, in: Proceedings of the Michigan Morphometric Workshop, F. J. Rohlf, and F. L. Bookstein, eds., The University of Michigan Museum of Zoology, Ann Harbor, MI, pp. 167–178.
  5. Rohlf, F. J. and Marcus, L. F., 1993, A revolution in morphometrics, TREE 8(4):129–132.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Related

Metadata

Authors
Baylac, M., & Frieß, M.
Affiliations
  • Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (FR)
  • American Museum of Natural History (US)
ORCID
Frieß, Martin
Venue
Developments in Primatology: Progress and Prospects
Publisher
Kluwer Academic Publishers-Plenum Publishers
Published
2006-05-31
Pages
145-165
DOI
10.1007/0-387-27614-9_6
OpenAlex
W109091988
Cited by
164
References
43
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 14 · 2022: 15 · 2021: 16 · 2020: 16 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 9 · 2015: 10 · 2014: 8 · 2013: 16 · 2012: 8
FWCI
10.76
Type
book chapter
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Kluwer Academic Publishers-Plenum Publishers eBooks (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics › Morphological variations and asymmetry
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Archeology (arts and humanities) › Forensic Anthropology and Bioarchaeology Studies
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computational Theory and Mathematics › Topological and Geometric Data Analysis
Keywords
Fourier descriptors, Procrustes superimposition, head shape, modern human populations, shape analysis, dimensionality reduction, skull morphology

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review