Cited by 103Indigenous Health, Education, and RightsDecolonial Thought and EpistemologiesAcademic and Historical Perspectives in Psychology

From Decolonizing Psychology to the Development of a Cross-Indigenous Perspective in Methodology

Pe-Pua, Rogelia·2006·International and Cultural Psychology

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/0-387-28662-4_5

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 18 · Cited by 103

Authors
Pe-Pua, R.
Venue
International and Cultural Psychology
Publisher
Springer US
Published
2006-09-02
Pages
109-137
OpenAlex
W169108494
Cited by
103
References
18
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 31 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 9 · 2012: 5
FWCI
4.55
Type
book chapter
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Springer eBooks (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Health › Indigenous Health, Education, and Rights
  • Social Sciences › Anthropology › Decolonial Thought and Epistemologies
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › General Psychology › Academic and Historical Perspectives in Psychology
Keywords
decolonizing psychology, Indigenous research methodologies, indigenous knowledge, research methodology, decolonization

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review