The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Natural Resources Research
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Analysis of the phenology of global vegetation using meteorological satellite data
JUSTICE, C. O., TOWNSHEND, J. R. G., HOLBEN, B. N., & TUCKER, C. J. (1985) · International Journal of Remote Sensing · doi:10.1080/01431168508948281 · Cited by 1,113
Digital Economy as a Factor in the Technological Development of the Mineral Sector
Litvinenko, V. S. (2020) · Natural Resources Research · doi:10.1007/s11053-019-09568-4 · Cited by 561
Primary production: Terrestrial ecosystems
Lieth, H. (1973) · Human Ecology · doi:10.1007/bf01536729 · Cited by 326
Southern African fire regimes as revealed by remote sensing
Archibald, S., Scholes, R. J., Roy, D. P., Roberts, G., & Boschetti, L. (2010) · International Journal of Wildland Fire · doi:10.1071/wf10008 · Cited by 241
Methods of Assessing Terrestrial Productivty
Whittaker, R. H., & Marks, P. L. (1975) · Ecological Studies · doi:10.1007/978-3-642-80913-2_4 · Cited by 153
Metadata
- Venue
- Natural Resources Research
- Published
- 2013-05-25
- ISSN
- 1520-7439 (ISSN-L)
- 1573-8981
- OpenAlex
- W4239497198
- Cited by
- 185
- References
- 0
- Type
- paratext
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Natural Resources Research. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1007/11053.1573-8981
- The paper
- Natural Resources Research. (2013). Natural Resources Research. https://doi.org/10.1007/11053.1573-8981
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
