Cited by 153Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics StudiesPlant Water Relations and Carbon DynamicsForest ecology and management

Methods of Assessing Terrestrial Productivty

Whittaker, Robert H., Marks, Peter L.·1975·Ecological Studies

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/978-3-642-80913-2_4

Cites

164 of 164 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • For different species in short-rotation woody crop systems, 25-35% of total tree biomass was found in the roots, with 10% specified as fine roots, confirmed for a 10-year-old poplar plantation.

    “For different species in SRWC systems, 25–35 % of total tree biomass was found in the roots [87], with 10 % specified as fine roots, confirmed for a 10-year-old poplar plantation [5].”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Whittaker, R. H., & Marks, P. L.
Affiliations
Cornell University (US)
Venue
Ecological Studies
Published
1975
Pages
55-118
ISSN
0070-8356 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1498265525
Cited by
153
References
164
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 7 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 4
FWCI
1.14
Type
book chapter
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Ecological studies (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Nature and Landscape Conservation › Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Plant Water Relations and Carbon Dynamics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Nature and Landscape Conservation › Forest ecology and management
Keywords
terrestrial productivity, net primary productivity, standing crop, organic matter turnover, woody plants, productivity measurement methods

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review