Designing Usable Interfaces with Cultural Dimensions
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Colour and images should be used in interface design to prevent end-users from getting lost in collectivistic cultures, while they should be used to provide additional information in individualistic cultures.
“According to Ford and Kotz (2005) colour and images should be used in interface design to prevent end-user from getting lost in collectivistic cultures, while it should be used to provide additional information in Individualistic cultures.”
From Individual level culture influence on online consumer iTrust aspects towards purchase intention across cultures: A S-O-R model (2015) · cites this paper as Ford and Kotz (2005)
Cites
Crosscurrents: cultural dimensions and global Web user-interface design
Marcus, A., & Gould, E. W. (2000) · Interactions · doi:10.1145/345190.345238 · Cited by 654 · cited 1× · see citing works
“The character traits expected of users displaying each side of each dimension is presented below [2, 10, 12, 13 ]: 716 G. Ford and P. Kotze”
Background
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Sohaib, O., & Kang, K. (2015) · International Journal of Electronic Business · doi:10.1504/ijeb.2015.069104 · Cited by 60 · see citing works
Culturally sensitive user interface design: a case study with German and Vietnamese users
Lachner, F., Nguyen, M.-A., & Butz, A. (2018) · Proceedings of the Second African Conference for Human Computer Interaction: Thriving Communities · doi:10.1145/3283458.3283459 · Cited by 19 · see citing works
Cultural Preferences of Pakistan for the University Website Design
Nizamani, S., Nizamani, S., Khoumbati, K.-U.-R., Nizamani, S., Memon, S., & Basir, N. (2018) · 2018 International Conference on Information and Communication Technology for the Muslim World (ICT4M) · doi:10.1109/ict4m.2018.00066 · Cited by 5 · see citing works
- Authors
- Ford, G., & Kotzé, P.
- Affiliations
- University of KwaZulu-Natal (ZA)
- University of South Africa (ZA)
- ORCID
- Kotzé, Paula
- Venue
- Lecture Notes in Computer Science
- Publisher
- Springer Berlin Heidelberg
- Published
- 2005
- Pages
- 713-726
- ISSN
- 0302-9743 (ISSN-L)
- 1611-3349
- OpenAlex
- W1578992040
- Cited by
- 89
- References
- 1
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 8 · 2015: 9 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 10 · 2012: 2
- FWCI
- 2.23
- Type
- conference paper
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Lecture notes in computer science (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Human-Computer Interaction › Usability and User Interface Design
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Cultural Differences and Values
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Human-Computer Interaction › Innovative Human-Technology Interaction
- Keywords
- cultural dimensions, Hofstede, user interface design, usability, cross-cultural design, cultural profile
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review