Intrinsic Plagiarism Detection
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Stylometric methods have become so reliable that the legislations of the USA, UK and Australia acknowledge the analyses carried out.
“Stylometric methods (Zu Eissen & Stein, 2006) have become so reliable that the legislations of the USA, UK and Australia acknowledge the analyses carried out (Brennan & Greenstadt, 2009).”
From Taxonomy of academic plagiarism methods (2021) · cites this paper as Zu Eissen & Stein, 2006
Many research works have been conducted to tackle the task of intrinsic plagiarism detection.
“Many research works have been conducted to tackle the task of intrinsic plagiarism detection [23], [33], [34], [66], [103]-[107].”
From Understanding Plagiarism Linguistic Patterns, Textual Features, and Detection Methods (2012) · cites this paper as [34]
Cites
Near Similarity Search and Plagiarism Analysis
Stein, B., & zu Eissen, S. M. (2006) · Studies in Classification, Data Analysis, and Knowledge Organization · doi:10.1007/3-540-31314-1_52 · Cited by 62 · see citing works
Self-citation
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Understanding Plagiarism Linguistic Patterns, Textual Features, and Detection Methods
Alzahrani, S. M., Salim, N., & Abraham, A. (2012) · IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, Part C (Applications and Reviews) · doi:10.1109/tsmcc.2011.2134847 · Cited by 299 · see citing works
Academic Plagiarism Detection: A Systematic Literature Review
Foltýnek, T., Meuschke, N., & Gipp, B. (2020) · ACM Computing Surveys · doi:10.1145/3345317 · Cited by 238 · see citing works
State-of-the-art in detecting academic plagiarism
Meuschke, N., & Gipp, B. (2013) · International Journal for Educational Integrity · doi:10.21913/ijei.v9i1.847 · Cited by 112 · see citing works
Biomedical text mining for research rigor and integrity: tasks, challenges, directions
Kilicoglu, H. (2017) · Briefings in Bioinformatics · doi:10.1093/bib/bbx057 · Cited by 61 · see citing works
Pertile, S. D. L., Moreira, V. P., & Rosso, P. (2016) · Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology · doi:10.1002/asi.23593 · Cited by 36 · see citing works
Taxonomy of academic plagiarism methods
Vrbanec, T., & Meštrović, A. (2021) · Zbornik Veleučilišta u Rijeci · doi:10.31784/zvr.9.1.17 · Cited by 4 · see citing works
- Authors
- Eissen, S. M. Z., & Stein, B.
- Affiliations
- Bauhaus-Universität Weimar (DE)
- ORCID
- Stein, Benno
- Venue
- Lecture Notes in Computer Science
- Publisher
- Springer Berlin Heidelberg
- Published
- 2006
- Pages
- 565-569
- ISSN
- 0302-9743 (ISSN-L)
- 1611-3349
- OpenAlex
- W1509629370
- Cited by
- 184
- References
- 1
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 12 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 14 · 2015: 15 · 2014: 23 · 2013: 14 · 2012: 12
- FWCI
- 47.80
- Type
- conference paper
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Lecture notes in computer science (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Safety Research › Academic integrity and plagiarism
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Authorship Attribution and Profiling
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Spam and Phishing Detection
- Keywords
- writing style variation, stylistic features
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
