Cited by 95Formal Methods in VerificationLogic, programming, and type systemsSoftware Testing and Debugging Techniques

Model Checking Multithreaded Programs with Asynchronous Atomic Methods

Open access
Sen, Koushik, Viswanathan, Mahesh·2006·Lecture Notes in Computer Science

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/11817963_29

Cites

30 of 30 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Gamma et al.'s 1994 book Design Patterns outlined patterns useful for object-oriented programming.

    “An example is Gamma et al.'s 1994 book Design Patterns, which outlined patterns useful for object-oriented programming.12”

    From A view of the parallel computing landscape (2009) · cites this paper as [12]

    The Introduction discusses an asynchronous-method design idiom and cites Holub’s Taming Java Threads, while the References do not list Gamma et al.’s Design Patterns. Searches for Gamma, Design Patterns, and patterns for object-oriented programming found no passage addressing what that book outlined. (LLM, conf=0.78)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 4

  1. [16]16. T. A. Henzinger, R. Jhala, R. Majumdar, and S. Qadeer. Thread-modular abstraction refine- ment. In Proc. of the 15th International Conference on Computer-Aided Verification (CAV), volume 2725 of LNCS, pages 262-274. Springer, 2003.
  2. [21]21. R. Mayr. Decidability and Complexity of Model Checking Problems for Infinite-State Sys- tems. PhD thesis, Technical University Munich, 1998.
  3. [25]25. S. Qadeer, S. Rajamani, , and J. Rehof. Procedure summaries for model checking multi- threaded software. In Principles of Programming Languages (POPL'04), 2004.
  4. [27]27. S. Qadeer and D. Wu. KISS: keep it simple and sequential. In ACM SIGPLAN 2004 confer- ence on Programming language design and implementation, pages 14-24, 2004.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Sen, K., & Viswanathan, M.
Affiliations
University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign (US)
Venue
Lecture Notes in Computer Science
Published
2006
Pages
300-314
ISSN
  • 0302-9743 (ISSN-L)
  • 1611-3349
OpenAlex
W1563374799
Cited by
95
References
30
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 1 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 9 · 2014: 9 · 2013: 9 · 2012: 13
FWCI
4.83
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Lecture notes in computer science (publishedVersion)
  • Illinois Digital Environment for Access to Learning and Scholarship (University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • National Science Foundation (CAREER)
  • Office of Naval Research (N00014-02-1-0715, N00014)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computational Theory and Mathematics › Formal Methods in Verification
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Logic, programming, and type systems
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Software › Software Testing and Debugging Techniques
Keywords
model checking, multithreaded programs, decidability, counterexample-guided abstraction refinement

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review