The DOI matches its Crossref record; 52 of the 52 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Simulation-Sound NIZK Proofs for a Practical Language and Constant Size Group Signatures
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Random oracles are practical: a paradigm for designing efficient protocols
Bellare, M., & Rogaway, P. (1993) · Proceedings of the 1st ACM conference on Computer and communications security - CCS '93 · doi:10.1145/168588.168596 · Cited by 4,712
Universally composable security: a new paradigm for cryptographic protocols
Canetti, R. (2001) · Proceedings 42nd IEEE Symposium on Foundations of Computer Science · doi:10.1109/sfcs.2001.959888 · Cited by 3,309
Boneh, D., Boyen, X., & Shacham, H. (2004) · Lecture Notes in Computer Science · doi:10.1007/978-3-540-28628-8_3 · Cited by 2,089
Efficient Identity-Based Encryption Without Random Oracles
Waters, B. (2005) · Lecture Notes in Computer Science · doi:10.1007/11426639_7 · Cited by 2,014
Evaluating 2-DNF Formulas on Ciphertexts
Boneh, D., Goh, E.-J., & Nissim, K. (2005) · Lecture Notes in Computer Science · doi:10.1007/978-3-540-30576-7_18 · Cited by 1,692
Chaum, D., & van Heyst, E. (1991) · Theory and Application of Cryptographic Techniques · Cited by 1,492
Short Signatures Without Random Oracles
Boneh, D., & Boyen, X. (2004) · Lecture Notes in Computer Science · doi:10.1007/978-3-540-24676-3_4 · Cited by 1,447
Kiayias, A., Tsiounis, Y., & Yung, M. M. (2004) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-540-24676-3_34 · Cited by 1,267
(2005) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/b136415 · Cited by 1,234
Chaum, D., & van Heyst, E. (1991) · Lecture Notes in Computer Science · doi:10.1007/3-540-46416-6_22 · Cited by 1,196
Cited by
On the Size of Pairing-Based Non-interactive Arguments
Groth, J. (2016) · Lecture Notes in Computer Science · doi:10.1007/978-3-662-49896-5_11 · Cited by 1,271
Self-citationSNARKs for C: Verifying Program Executions Succinctly and in Zero Knowledge
Ben-Sasson, E., Chiesa, A., Genkin, D., Tromer, E., & Virza, M. (2013) · Lecture Notes in Computer Science · doi:10.1007/978-3-642-40084-1_6 · Cited by 598
Short Pairing-Based Non-interactive Zero-Knowledge Arguments
Groth, J. (2010) · Lecture Notes in Computer Science · doi:10.1007/978-3-642-17373-8_19 · Cited by 440
Self-citationMaji, H. K., Prabhakaran, M., & Rosulek, M. (2011) · Lecture Notes in Computer Science · doi:10.1007/978-3-642-19074-2_24 · Cited by 437
Structure-Preserving Signatures and Commitments to Group Elements
Abe, M., Fuchsbauer, G., Groth, J., Haralambiev, K., & Ohkubo, M. (2010) · Lecture Notes in Computer Science · doi:10.1007/978-3-642-14623-7_12 · Cited by 354
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Groth, J.
- Venue
- Lecture Notes in Computer Science
- Publisher
- Springer Berlin Heidelberg
- Published
- 2006
- Pages
- 444-459
- ISSN
- 0302-9743 (ISSN-L)
- 1611-3349
- OpenAlex
- W1548963432
- Cited by
- 390
- References
- 52
- FWCI
- 6.96
- Type
- conference paper
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Simulation-Sound NIZK Proofs for a Practical Language and Constant Size Group Signatures. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1007/11935230_29
- The paper
- Groth, J. (2006). Simulation-Sound NIZK Proofs for a Practical Language and Constant Size Group Signatures. Lecture Notes in Computer Science. https://doi.org/10.1007/11935230_29
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
